Jump to content

MrHavok

Banned
  • Posts

    148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MrHavok

  1. [quote name='Lamuella' timestamp='1296140540' post='2605556'] you kind of need a comma here, unless you're suggesting that MK is GOONS. [/quote] I wouldnt say MK is GOONs. I would say MK is the puppet master that controls GOONs
  2. [quote name='Choson' timestamp='1296011278' post='2601661'] I'm pretty sure I know the name to my own alliance better than you do, but keep on truckin', slugger! One day, you'll figure out punctuation! Almost as inept as you are talented at constructing good sentences? We must not be that inept, since you're not very talented at sentence structure and rules. [/quote] Aww is that all you got puppets is to criticize grammar well don't worry im sure you great GOONs will get an original thought in your heads one of these days.
  3. [quote name='Choson' timestamp='1296009751' post='2601632'] Unlike you, we can actually punctuate and capitalize our sentences. It was so hard slogging through your word salad. Maybe if you get your head out of your @#!&, you'd be able to type better. P.S. - It's GOONS, not GOONs. And no, we didn't cry for help. Way to whitewash history. They begged us to join in the fun. [/quote] I'm sure it was hard slogging through it but you got the point And I'm sure MK told you to say they asked for help but we all know the truth you guys are inept And trust me I know it's GOONs
  4. [quote name='Choson' timestamp='1296008564' post='2601598'] Yes, actually it does make his point less valid. And I'm pretty sure I quoted a statement, not a question. [/quote] You know what you have a good point why bother talking with any member of GOONs you guys are horrendous aren't you the same alliance that cried for help from MK to fight FnKA and the ninjas because of your ineptitude then tried have those alliances sanctioned as rogues If I want GOONs opinion I'll ask the MK guy with his hand up your @$$#%
  5. [quote name='Choson' timestamp='1296008238' post='2601585'] Like anyone should really be listening to you when it entails rogues. [/quote] Being a rogue at one point doesn't make his point less valid - stop deflecting and answer his questions The lengths you all go to too simply avoid answering questions is shameful at best
  6. [quote name='Crowdog' timestamp='1296006406' post='2601527'] How about a really good hunch. It seemed to us that NPO was being protected in this war, thus the chained alliances were not coming in to help Polar for what we presumed to be fear that Pacifica would be brought in. We cannot imagine another reason that Polar and co.'s allies would not come in to support them when at the time it was an uphill battle. Any support would help them greatly. So that's our reason for our assumption. Based on that rational assumption, we find that the NPO seems to be held in high regard by the opposing side of this war. The last time they were held in any regard similar to that was pre-karma, when NPO DID rule the world with their iron fist. During that time NPO valiantly fought and gave MK plenty of reasons to hate it. We do hate NPO. We do not want even the slightest chance to see them in power again. If our assumptions are true, and reasonably they may be, we can't allow any small chance of NPO ruling Bob again. We hate NPO, and we will not give them the chance. That's why we fight. [/quote] As I said earlier to some other clown You and your alliance are a fraud
  7. [quote name='King Srqt' timestamp='1296006311' post='2601526'] I'll try. Why exactly are you declaring war on NPO? How is your declaration on NPO any different from the very things you have condemned them for? Do you truly believe this war is justified, if so why? [/quote] I think he meant questions that he would actually answer honestly Your questions are ones that require maximum spin and wordsmithing
  8. [quote name='Yevgeni Luchenkov' timestamp='1296005363' post='2601487'] Simply unable to let go of petty grudges or wanting to avoid problems down the road? We consider the New Pacific Order a threat to the world at large and our interests in particular: we act on it. Or perhaps we are nihilist villains and we simply want to see the world burn? Who knows. Certainly not you. As a side note: if there's a high horse, we're sharing the saddle it seems. [/quote] Who in this world did you talk to before you spoke for the rest of us? The lackeys/hangerons who want to worship at archons mule is probably the world you consulted is my guess
  9. [quote name='Crowdog' timestamp='1296005308' post='2601486'] Alas, then maybe we should stop posting in this thread. Maybe you should stop reading if you don't seek answers to legitimate questions. But if you come to accuse us of wrongdoing then I will attempt alleviate your confusion. That is all. [/quote] Provide legitimate answers - stop backpedaling, stop trying to justify the rights of the same actions you complained about a year ago, stop twisting words, stop trying to divert attention Be honest and maybe just maybe people will respect you And I haven't seen such a poor job of alleviating confusion since the gramlins/IRON fiasco Did you perhaps learn from Matthew pk? Maybe that's why you aren't good at alleviating things
  10. [quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1296005123' post='2601474'] Archon must really feel guilty with that wall of text trying to justify his no cb war. The only thing they are saying more than [i]"here is our justification"[/i] is [i]"we dont need or require anyones justification"[/i] [/quote] Give this man a cigar
  11. [quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1296004548' post='2601449'] Yet you and dozens like you are all over the place trying to justify this and spin it as for the good of all of Bob. [/quote] That's because only the guilty feel the need to justify themselves
  12. [quote name='Janosik' timestamp='1296004572' post='2601452'] Rephrase your question please, or at least make it a polite one. [/quote] Please rephrase your statement it doesn't make sense
  13. [quote name='Penkala' timestamp='1296003706' post='2601424'] This IS respectable. Enjoy EZI, MrHavok. [/quote] Wow the truth really does hurt I guess
  14. [quote name='Janosik' timestamp='1296003418' post='2601405'] In your opinion, has NPO been capable of all I listed as their typical NPOish behavior in these past two years? Or did someone put a stop to that... Also, your opinion on whether left alone NPO will continue to strengthen. MK is riding a temperous bull for the sake of CN. Or if you dislike that moralist approach; MK is becoming just as evil as NPO was and is therefore the lifeblood of a resurging Planet Bob. Rephrase your question please, or at least make it a reasonable one. [/quote] Well you seem slow and clueless so I will explain further You have no concept of the reality of this situation and are clearly not very intelligent and have no handling of what is going on So since you are clearly delusional I ask again, what color is the sky in your world?
  15. [quote name='Penkala' timestamp='1296003270' post='2601399'] NPO: Instigates what, over a dozen such wars, has no problem with it. Doomhouse: Instigates one such war (that makes much more sense, actually, giving the poking and prodding NPO's done). Doomhouse is literally worse than NPO. Edit: Everyone who argued against our side in this thread is getting EZI. Any alliance that ever aids you or accepts you as a member gets rolled. [/quote] You are a fraud
  16. [quote name='Yevgeni Luchenkov' timestamp='1296003080' post='2601386'] It's so nice to be young and think the world was born with us, isn't it? Those of us who were there back then have a moral responsibility to act. [/quote] All that ego must be the reason you have no sense to see your own hypocrisy
  17. [quote name='Janosik' timestamp='1296002032' post='2601333'] Old CN remembers getting rolled by NPO no matter which alliance they fled to. New CN thinks they're the martyrs. Good thing history backs up old CN, and naivete supports new CN. *was in ONOS when they were attacked, viceroyed, and ultimately disbanded by NPO* But keep on saying that MK is just as bad for preventing NPO from the same old same old, I enjoy reading fiction. [/quote] What color is the sky in your world of make believe
  18. [quote name='Yevgeni Luchenkov' timestamp='1296001164' post='2601304'] I'd just like to point out, for some, that you can be against TOP's offensive in BiPolar's war and still be in favour of preemptive strikes. What failed TOP was politics and the fact that they trusted Polaris to begin with. Not the preemptive strike in itself. Striking preemptively is a mean, not an end in itself. To be against preemptive strikes is frivolous and a thing of the past; much like refusing to use nuclear weapons. [/quote] Be careful not to pull a muscle reaching for that logic
  19. [quote name='Felix von Agnu' timestamp='1295916198' post='2597424'] The public outrage was after the declaration... Really, no matter what we do, we end up losing. !@#$%* position, yes, but one we've forced on others. [/quote] So then the answer is no you won't be defending an ally who was attacked without cause Seems to be the PB way I guess First NEW now NV
  20. [quote name='Enrage' timestamp='1295915910' post='2597412'] You do understand if VE declares on Sparta, they would be fighting against their own cause right? [/quote] I thought ve's cause was to fabricate cb's then backpedal when the truth comes out
  21. [quote name='Felix von Agnu' timestamp='1295915584' post='2597401'] They declared, and were subsequently criticized for it. By which exact parties, I'm not enthusiastic enough to say. [/quote] It's not the criticism that we are talking about stop shifting the argument to that Fact Polaris declared on someone because of a treaty - right or wrong who cares? Public opinion on the move irrelevant because they followed their treaty So Polaris honored their treaty despite public opinion and did what had to be done Are you all going to man up and defend your treaty partner who was attacked without cause or are you simply going to politic away around it like cowards?
  22. [quote name='The Big Bad' timestamp='1295915449' post='2597396'] I agree I do not know why people assume your tossing you allies under they bus. Not just because your treaty does not give and kind out clause for "coalition warfare" and makes it clear you must defend them. You will defend them because it is the right thing to do. As for the Polar hitting TOP thing I think you are talking about TOP attacking MK out of blue like Sparta has attacked NV. As I recall it was and contiues to be considered one of the stupidest things done in some time. And here we have it again. I mean you have be pissed Sparta has attacked your ally without even a treaty back it up. Thats a slap in VEs face. [/quote] No he's talking in the last war when polar was "forced by treaty" to attack a member of "their" side but as I said polar did declare so again ve what's your excuse
  23. [quote name='Felix von Agnu' timestamp='1295914449' post='2597365'] It's actually kind funny watching people try to take any excuse they can to take a shot at us. A fun exercise would be to find all the people who are telling us to declare on Sparta, and see what they said about Polar hitting TOP or whoever it was. [/quote] But they did declare on whoever it was so there goes that argument So you will be defending nv then?
  24. Congrats on the win and Europa is indeed in fine hands
×
×
  • Create New...