Lackistan

This is a smart man, and this is a fantastic idea. CN really could use a cleansing of grudges, and now more then ever is the best time to do it.

Four days till the flag gets in game, iirc.

What are you talking about? If you mean a place to "mark" people who surrender (though I dispute that they would be traitors) then there is a surrender topic, as well as a POW AA.

And considering the track record of rumours involving Citadel and how often they are accurate, I suspect OG doesn't have a thing to worry about

Scum of the Earth? Quite the hyperbole.

Well, I am not in Farkistan, so this is only my opinion, but yeah, I am OK with that, if they indeed decide this. Because, CN courtesy states that even if an alliance dies, it keeps its reputation. If you want to bring it back, you better make sure the people who had problems with it are ok with it. VE, for example, did this.

Of course not. But Fark has every right to stop him doing so as well. But just creating TF! and just expecting a blank slate from Fark is kind of absurd.

As a character, I agree 100%. But alliances do not tend to get the same courtesy.

It really has nothing to do wth "sins of your fathers". If I made an alliance called "Better Order of the Paradox" or "Ragnarockandroll" or whatever, I would expect a less then kind reaction, probably even ZI if I refused to change it. Likewise, if I named my alliance "LUE" or "/b/", I would expect the same treatment.

Errr, no. Fark has every right imaginable to object to this, it is a valid CB.

Yep, TDO is now 0.03 score over FoK.

Wow, Citadel is pretty much the least lucky Bloc in history. Every friend, ally, and member, has conspired against the Citadel as a whole, and the individual alliances inside it. It's pretty shocking they are still alive.

ODN routinely gets beat. NATO, on the other hand...

This is humorous.

Wow. Well said. You should have posted this 15 pages ago

DoW webs suck, don't try it. To be worth while you have to show declaration directions (who declared on who) and, ideally, treaty connections.

Well, if IRON agreed to waive the NAP (which seems utterly bizarre to me), then have a good fight, and I am glad I was wrong.

Not sure that legitimizes "waiving" the 48 hour NAP.

I know. But unless a member of the Conclave can explain an ulterior justification, I will have to assume this is it.

Glad to see Gremlins has fallen into the good old CN habit of e-lawyering treaties for convienence.

I was unaware that RoK and Gremlins were allied. I was also under the impression that Gremlins enforced non-chaining clauses in all treaties.

Wow, this is not something I would have expected of you.

75% of treaties have always been worth less then toilet paper in CN. What has changed is how blatant this fact is.

Sounds like you destroyed a massive conspiracy. Not some schmuck at ALL.

Wow, this one was a loooong time coming. Grats, glad to see it finally occur!