Jump to content

fallin

Members
  • Content Count

    291
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About fallin

  • Rank
    Mostly Harmless!

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    United Confederacy
  • Alliance Name
    Mostly Harmless Alliance
  • Resource 1
    Gems
  • Resource 2
    Uranium
  1. Congrats April! You've always been one of the more pleasant people I've met in CN. Glad to hear that you're doing so well.
  2. I'm glad that we've been dealing with the competition from Pacifica fairly well. My props to our economic team.
  3. I'm just a passerby but this dude really reminds me of emily. [color="#FF8C00"]fallin waves at MK. [/color] Now you know how we felt. >.>
  4. How would you divide your senate votes between the candidates of the numerous spheres? Would you vote Aqua above Orange?
  5. [quote name='shilo' date='06 April 2010 - 09:35 PM' timestamp='1270589720' post='2250730'] Well then, as you are the treaty partner of gRAMlins left, I will assume you and your government support gRAMlins until I see an announcement saying otherwise, fair deal? [/quote] I'm more inclined to hold a neutral stance but I can see where you're coming from. You'll keep your assumptions, I'll keep mine. My triumvirate, in their time and grace when they do say something, will prove either one of us wrong. Deal.
  6. [quote name='shilo' date='06 April 2010 - 09:21 PM' timestamp='1270588843' post='2250714'] There isn't much to argue about here actually. There haven't been a lot of things in the history of CN that have been equally much despised as the actions of your best friends and allies gRAMlins. Now if you want to set a sign, make a public one that says you will no longer enable them to do what they are doing as they are no longer protected by you regardless of their actions. Cause that is what you are still doing right now, you are protecting them against any kind of interference while they are tr
  7. [quote name='AirMe' date='06 April 2010 - 05:35 PM' timestamp='1270575309' post='2250487'] Point me to a statement that I made that said I would attack anyone who gets in the Gremlins way. I will pay you 250 tech if you can find such a post from me here in this thread. Let me lay it out for you: I WANT GREMLINS TO BE ATTACKED! Ram has ruined that alliance and he held peace up for 5 days before they were left on the battlefield. In no way do I support or condone his actions. And I fully think that any of IRON and DAWN's allies who come to help them should not be countered. Go ahead Alter
  8. [quote name='Vladimir Stukov II' date='05 April 2010 - 04:02 PM' timestamp='1270483341' post='2249188'] Yes, because IRON is certainly in shape to take on an alliance with the best top tier in the game currently. I guess it won't hurt IRON to have all their nations held below a certain NS level. [/quote] That may be so, but its far from "destroying" IRON as has been claimed. This IRON vs Gramlins war isn't stacked up against IRON the way the old curbstomps were. Most definitely not a scenario where the winning side had upwards of 3-4 times the total NS of the losing side. I don't personall
  9. [quote name='Alterego' date='05 April 2010 - 03:48 PM' timestamp='1270482483' post='2249168'] Your side is denying IRON any assistance with the threat of force and enabling Gramlins keep this going for as long as they like. [/quote] Firstly, Gramlins fought with us. They lost infra for us. It would be an absolute form of disrespect to the nations of the said alliance for us to attack them. We might not agree with them politically, but Admin help us if we ever attack the people that came to our defense in our time of need. Alterego, I can understand that you have your opinion and I have
  10. [quote name='Alterego' date='05 April 2010 - 03:42 PM' timestamp='1270482121' post='2249160'] They can still try and with everyone on their side ready to defend them it just means no peace for an already devastated IRON for as long as Gramlins have the backing of their friends in this. [/quote] I hope you realize Gramlins only has one military treaty left. We've already left the war.
  11. [quote name='Alterego' date='05 April 2010 - 03:17 PM' timestamp='1270480622' post='2249125'] You cant appease mad men and tyrannical monsters. [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neville_Chamberlain#Aftermath_and_reception"]"OOC"[/url] [/quote] Would you like to highlight the line of logic between MHA speaking to our allies in private and appeasement?
  12. This peace stuff. Terrible thing to have. I hear its turning into an epidemic. On a more serious note though, all the best for the future both of you.
  13. [quote name='Alterego' date='05 April 2010 - 03:00 PM' timestamp='1270479603' post='2249104'] Congratulations, Im sure it did the trick [img]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_8adFNycaanI/SwQnjM7UTII/AAAAAAAABOw/CXwKuAt7wTY/s1600/chamberlain.jpeg[/img] [/quote] Pardon my ignorance, but could you clarify what you're trying to imply with the picture above?
  14. [quote name='Alterego' date='05 April 2010 - 02:54 PM' timestamp='1270479245' post='2249097'] Just becsude they are cliches doesnt mean they do not reflect the truth of this situation. Dismissing them as nothing but cliches is the arguement of an "enabler of evil"(c) [/quote] You still haven't responded to my point about MHA taking our concerns with our Gramlin brothers in private.
×
×
  • Create New...