Jump to content

Hymenbreach

Members
  • Posts

    1,706
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hymenbreach

  1. Whatever happened to the 'Statement of Respect' I wrote for you guys, to help avoid this kind of thing? I see it isn't pinned anymore (though it could be in the private part, I suppose).

    LMC, take deep breaths and move on. If you have any feelings for the Legion, stop now. You've punched the walls on your way out, which is fine, but don't knock one of the walls down. Arbiter has confessed to having a terrible attitude and, lightning conversions aside, is not going to change his attitude overnight. If you have anything to say to him, go have a pm fight or an Irc fight.

    As for the haters, The Legion will thank you. Your hate is their cement, always has been, always will be. Without you, Legion would have died years ago.

  2. [quote name='Lamuella' date='07 July 2010 - 11:00 PM' timestamp='1278539992' post='2362773']
    why would you mention postcount rather than date joined?
    [/quote]

    Because for most fora, post count does equate to length of membership. Not in this case and I should have been clearer on that point.

  3. [quote name='Banksy' date='07 July 2010 - 10:34 PM' timestamp='1278538443' post='2362744']
    After all, large post counts do validate your opinion! Legion members posting in here seem to have low post counts too. Does that mean their points do not matter?

    There is also nothing wrong with forming an opinion based on secondary information. You are removed from the situation and not so emotionally attached as someone who was may be. You have a less polarising world view.
    [/quote]

    Yes, that's exactly what I meant. You could in no way be expected to infer that low post count may mean newish accounts by my mention of a three year time period. I will endeavour to assume you are incapable of any level of extended cognition.

    Also, nothing wrong with having a viewpoint based on secondary information. Just expect me to have less respect for it.


    edit: readability, late on.

  4. [quote name='Chief Savage Man' date='07 July 2010 - 08:10 PM' timestamp='1278529824' post='2362605']
    I probably speak for most of the detractors in this thread when I say I am making judgment based on four years of Legion's actions.
    [/quote]


    Four years of other people judgements. Most of the detractors seem incapable of independent thought. I've seen people with two figure post counts commenting on things that happened 3 years ago.

  5. I'm getting fairly tired of thinking 'Oh, Legion" when I come into one of these threads.

    @Lincon. May I extend your analogy? Sure, punish LMC for his bashing of other 'corporations', but what about the cancer in your mist that has never managed to be respectful to his fellow 'Employees'? As far as I know, he has never been punished, in fact he becomes more central to the Legion every month. He also had the temerity to quote the code of ethics in this thread.

    Alliances can deal with unusual characters in their midst in several ways. Several people who appear to be pains can have their energies channelled into useful areas. Others continue to be destructive, no matter how much you try.

    The Legion is better than this. Cut out that cancer and things will settle down.

    LMC, my postbox is always open.

    I have spoken to Legion privately about my concerns.

  6. [quote name='Sandwich Controversy' date='30 June 2010 - 12:43 AM' timestamp='1277854989' post='2354517']
    > my almae matres :smug:

    edit2:
    holy god how did I miss this, ahahahahahah
    [/quote]


    I imagine it was because you were being a bit distracted and self-satisfied with how clever your remarks were.

  7. [quote name='Sandwich Controversy' date='29 June 2010 - 06:22 AM' timestamp='1277788958' post='2353636']
    Congratulations on having a terrible, inactive alliance merge into your already terrible alliance so that you can have enough members to obtain a sanction!

    (which will be taken away from you the next time you go to war [because you are terrible at it])

    As you can see, the word "terrible" can be applied a lot to the Legion.
    [/quote]

    How are thee an idiot? Let me count the ways, the breadth, the length, the depth. Legion have survived and thrived through more than your alliance could imagine, let alone cope with. This makes it not a terrible alliance.
    The hate of its enemies have kept the fires burning in Legion's heart, ensuring its survival and your unhappiness.
    If MASH was that inactive nobody would have moved over to Legion. Movement equals activity, though not wisdom as your mouth proves. Legion hasn't been terrible at war for 2 and a half years, as anyone with any knowledge will tell you.
    The word terrible can be applied a lot if your vocabulary isn't very big.

    Apart from that, you come across as a very smart fellow.

    ----

    Onto happier meadows...

    Congratulations, my Alma Mater. This is what I wanted for you when we saved our souls after Purple gate. I am so proud of you and glad that MASH has the wisdom not to listen to the chattering monkeys of the peanut gallery.

    There is no Alliance on Bob that deserves to be sanctioned as much as you. No group has kept the fires of faith burning as ferociously as you. No group has weathered the storms as much as the ship of the Legion. You are a truly remarkable crowd of stars in a black sky.

    Onwards Legion, onwards, to a future in which you shine fiercely, brightly and forever. May your lights never go out.

    I salute you.

    Ave legio!

×
×
  • Create New...