Jump to content

FreedomvilleAT

Banned
  • Posts

    357
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by FreedomvilleAT

  1. Thats not what I meant by attacking. I meant they wouldn't accept peace when we offered therefore they were planning on attacking us. We attacked PS because well...it's really stupid not to accept peace when it's given especially when NAAW never attacked MI. Thanks for your infra/tech.
  2. It's so easy to beat you guys down that I made it an OPTION for my nations in my alliance to attack you. I didn't even send out targets or real orders. I can't even find 1 nation with open slots.
  3. Um NAAW wanted peace...NAAW is not at war with MI...pornstars is just attacking us because we are in judgment.
  4. National Alliance of Arctic countrie's Warlordz [NAAW/NAACW] We are a blue/black team that has just merged. We stand for the FFBH. We have 115 solid nations ready for anything at anytime. We're ready for new members to join in on our fun so feel free to sign up. Our forums: http://z13.invisionfree.com/NAACW/index.php? Our IRC: #NAACW We are the National Alliance of Arctic Warlordz and we're here to play. /s/ For NAAW FreedomvilleAT, council of the NAAW
  5. Anyone has the right to say/do whatever they want. You can go ahead and try to avoid the filters on the forums, you can punch your teacher in the face, you can strip naked and run outside etc. But the reason people don't do it is because of consequences. You can do it even though you know you'll get in trouble or you can keep your mouth shut. Either way, you can do what you want.
  6. EDIT: It's not worth it. But I'm sure someone will quote it.
  7. I hope you know that there is no NAAC anymore. Also, no. I'm sticking up for my allies. I have good relations with Fark, GDA and UW. I joined this war as "NAAW" and the decisions we all made were new/fresh. It had nothing to do with the round before this, thanks for pulling that out when you have no idea. I fight with my allies, MI was never my ally. You do the math. Also, don't flatter yourself. Your alliance is not even good enough to hold a grudge against. Thats says a lot.
  8. Thanks for picking out a little statement to try and question me because you have nothing better to comment on. But, no thats not true. I just thought he was in MI by the way he was defending them.
  9. You're acting like you are one of them therefore since I don't really know [nor care] who you are, I'll post like your a part of them.
  10. Attacking people for fun makes people whine even more. Right now you can say "oh just attack for fun" but if judgment came right out and said we were fighting for no reason, you'd all cry your heads off and demand we surrender or you'll attack us with your anarchied nations.
  11. What you FAIL to understand is that judgment is NOT HERE TO CURBSTOMP FOR NO REASON. We all have VALID reasons as to why we're beating the !@#$ out of you. It's your policies and your arrogance that made this happen. It's your own mistakes within your alliance that made this happen. We didn't decide to just attack you, we decided that fighting with you is the only way to get these things through your thick arrogant skulls. We don't want #1 but if we do get #1, we will handle ourselves better than you did to prevent a coalition against us. Your strategy has failed and your nations are outnumbered. You're just down right stupid to keep fighting with us, making us look like the bad guys when you are the problem here. Not us. Stop acting like #1 is so hard. Aw poor MI boo-hoo. The only reason it was so hard for you is because you made it that way for yourself. Congrats. That's because you were at #1. You didn't have to dismantle anyone. You were pretty cozy in your little position but now that your being challenged you have to face something harder. You have to face the fact that not everyone wants MI at #1 anymore...running the show. It's a game after all, stop whining. For that last time, it's an *in character* forum. We're SUPPOSE to sound serious.
  12. I posted it, really? I'm Arcane? Because this thread isn't for you. It's for the people that want to surrender so by saying your not going to, its a matter of "no one cares."
  13. Really guys? This topic is for people who WANT to surrender. We don't honestly care if you don't, keep it to yourself and don't send the message to us. We could have terms a lot worse than this for the members that have been asking for peace but clearly judgment has chosen to keep them light. Also, I'm sure we're going to get some anti-terms people in here like always. You don't like terms? Don't surrender but the whole point of this war is to take down MI [for reasons from each alliance] and the only way to do that is get the people who want to surrender away from the rest of the alliance so they have less members. If we didn't have terms, everyone would re-roll and this whole mess would happen all over again.
  14. Or a 50 nation alliance of 4k+ NS and a 150 nation alliance with NS below 2k.
  15. If we wanted to just pile people on, we would've went to 20 nation alliances and gotten them to join. Most of the nations in the coalition have had some bad experience with MI this round [or it's allies have ] or don't believe in the alliance's policies. Judgment is not to fight for no reason but to fight for something we believe is wrong. I could not let my alliance in this coalition if it was just a random curbstomp for fun. That would violate the code in which I made for my new alliance to grow on. One quote always sticks in my head from the most famous war speech in CN: "To seek out evil and corruption and destroy it. To never give in to the oppression and never give up" - Arctic, NAAC.
  16. It was our own council member's IDEA for the coalition. Our signing was "he who shall not yet be named" get it right people. We didn't bandwagon, we set the entire war up. We wanted it to be a surprise to murder inc and everyone because when NAAC and Warlordz merged, everyone expected Warlordz to back up MI [even though we created an entirely new alliance]. It wasn't because we bandwagoned or were scared, we just wanted to make an entrance. Also pornstar, your very $@y for an alliance with only 42 members. I hope you know what you are getting yourselves into. Like elborrador said, some alliances will not make it out of this war. You can't say I didn't warn you. You can be as arrogant as you want when you reply to this but go look at the odds. You'd need nothing short of a miracle to win and I doubt you'll get one. NAAW: 231,960 strength > 115 members > 2,017 avg strength > 2 nukes > 11.11 > 4 anarchy PornStar: 45,790 strength > 42 members > 1,090 avg strength > 0 nukes > 3.93 score > 17 anarchy
  17. No, you did not make TUF surrender. That was NAAW's doing. We had to come to the rescue for you guys.
  18. Yes, on purpose. Thanks for commenting on the obvious.
  19. Are you the leader of pornstar? NAAW needs an answer on whether to attack in the next day or we're going to go through with the DoW.
  20. The National Alliance of Arctic Warlordz is declaring on PornStar due to their treaty with MI and relations in the war, however, as a leader of NAAW I do not want to see this happen. Lets face it, NAAW will ONLY do massive damage to the 41 nation alliance. We're triple your strength and it would be more of a curbstomp then a real war. We'd be seen as the bullies of CN just because we're #2 in strength. Judgment is not all about thrashing the weak. As half of our FFBH in NAAW says [and I quote] We are not going to disobey our own rules that we've taught our alliance. This is not fun nor fair play. We're offering you this. Stay completely out of the war and NAAW will not harm any of your nations. You just have to peace out of the war with any alliance you are fighting against and you won't have to deal with our 111 nations. You'd be smart to just accept this and peace out. If you want us to have your $@! then you can decline. So as I was saying, this is a semi-DoW. It's more like a warning. Make your decision wisely. We DO in face have to back up our judgment allies so if you do decide to say no, I will honor my word and attack. /s/ For NAAW FreedomvilleAT, council of NAAW Bob, council of NAAW KDL, council of NAAW
  21. Terms are always an option for anyone.
  22. What terms? I said no surrender terms will be given.
  23. [This is the official decision from the council of NAAW] Kaiser we accept peace. As long as you stay OUT of the war and peace completely with UW, your $@! will no longer be ours. No surrender terms will have to be used. Thanks.
×
×
  • Create New...