Il Principe

Another solution could be to make war more profitable. All alliances seem to want to sign as much treaties as possible with as large alliances as possible just to be safe. There is no benefit in taking risks or reason to oppose other(larger) alliances other as'making the game 'more interesting, there are only benefits(protection) in trying to ally with them. I dont now how this could be corrected. An possible option would be in-game peace terms. For instance surrender in a war by giving away infra, tech, land or 5 even happines. It would give alliances an (economic) incentive to try to win wars and would give nations/alliances a reason to try to overtrow dominant alliances. (but I realise, if done wrong it would just have the opposite consequence by giving dominant alliances more instruments to dominate other alliances )

We are over 42 again. Go get some sample at the MHA forum.

I think I will get me some and watch the nucleair stats made by Unspeakable Evil.

sad but necesarry. Whe have discussed this CB in our membership channels for over half a year. We gave RL a lot of opportunities to change its ways and to maintain peace but unfortunately it was in vain. MHAil!

@ Jerdge, I like the hello's. I does remind me of some other log dumps i saw recently @ CN all this and the Schattenman-topic tells me is that MHA should have stricter membership criteria

That tech terms were hash for you indeed. On the other hand, the military terms only saved you a lot of bills. Having to maintain as much tanks as possible is much worse. It should be a surrender term to max out your military, (including navy ) instead.

Thanks. It looks great (even in spite of it missing some MHAwsome numbers )

New Pacific Order: 49.02 --> 79.49 (+30.47) (+162%) FOK: 12.81 --> 27.11 (+14.3) (+212%) NPO did have the largest growth, but some alliances (FOK for instance) had a larger growth in percentages. So thats quite an achievement too, maybe even better.

Can you do a year "growth"-update today or tomorrow?

And we like it.

Our former AA was just MHA. Why don't you use the numbers from that AA? Do you throw away the numbers of old AA's? That being said, i'm quite impressed by the fast growth of the Aqua team.

Yes we did. We like updates.

just out of curiousity, what is the second way?

I do not think Floatsom is saying that all our members are active. But they are not ghosts either. Whe have a lot of members who were active once and became inactive later. However, in wartime they tend to visit our forums again and help us out.

That and they shut down CN for new nations for a few weeks to get rid of inactives. It was june or july, right after I started my first nation.

You can state your request in the proper Sparta embassy on our forum

I just hope for CSN that there is no Gandalf guarding the Add-line THOU SHALL NOT PASS!!!

Yes, you understood me. They went from 640 or so to 595 members in a few days. How come?

Now it is MHA 35.83 Sparta 35.80 Why did you guys stop recruitment?

I think thats one of the worst problems of being on top. There are few alliances te pass up there

Again we are closing the distance between us and Sparta. But a few days ago we where only 0,60 points away from them. So we have some catching up to do.

Maybe nations in a sanctioned alliances should get +5 happiness points because of the benefit of stable politics? That could be a way to give sanctioning some extra meaning.

Maybe there would be more alliances with 500+ members if they had an incentive to reach te 500 members point. It could help to clean up the mdp-web. Could it be that before the Unjust War there were more large alliances that used to tech raid or attack small alliances for fun like FAN and Goons. Maybe thats why there are so many small alliances now? Large alliances are to nice to them by signing a lot of protectorate treaties?

I agree with you completely. Actualy I think the requirement should be at 500. That really is an achievement to be proud of. 300 is a little bit of an odd number.

same here. Other statistics are great but with graphs it is possible to really see progress over the days.