Jump to content

MisterShadow

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    340

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by MisterShadow

  1. Announcement from the Legion concerning Tetris

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    I dont mean to be rude but maybe they should have done some spying on war guides...

    8 nations in Tetris top 10 are in war mode.
    2 are probably inactive (defcon 5 with little troops)
    2 are defcon 1 and buying troops
    1 is defcon 2 and buying troops
    2 are decon 1 and not buying troops
    1 is defcon 5... and buying troops (their #1 nation)

    I am the man who arranges the blocks!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWTFG3J1CP8


    Oh yah dont go complaining about me in peace been done there done that

  2. We Have a Grievance...

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Beefspari' timestamp='1296971996' post='2621598']
    As we're fighting 12 alliances we'll allow you to take credit for 1/12th of that 2m damage.

    2,000,000 / 12 = 166,666.67

    Man, we're kicking your butt. :awesome:
    [/quote]
    I could give you the actual war percentages if you wanted (if your stats department lacks them), we had more wars then the rest of the "12" with the exception of NPO

  3. We Have a Grievance...

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Rush Sykes' timestamp='1296971641' post='2621569']
    Id also like to point out, that this operation was planned months ago when MK was still in CnG and SirWilliam was still prince. The commencement of this operation today is a direct testament to the planning, cunning and carefully laid plot hatched by SirWilliam months ago.
    [/quote]
    Good to see that you all at one point waited for a proper CB before starting a war :D

  5. We Have a Grievance...

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Rush Sykes' timestamp='1296970525' post='2621477']
    Now THIS, is how a bloc should operate. It is announcements like this, that are the reasons blocs exist within the world.
    [/quote]
    Yup clearly,
    GOON attacks someone we have a MDP with (notice how if NPO had gone in then we would have had no treaty obligation to come in), then we declare on one of their attackers, then one of their treaty partners comes with a MDoAP. Which then triggers a MADP with a whole bunch of people at the same time. Yes a bloc needs that many lines to get invovled.

    Attack
    MDP->MDoAP->MADP (only 1 party invovled).

  22. NPO Terms

    in Open World RP

    Posted

    They have a "policy" that any damage you do to them unintentionally (or intentionally, I guess) has to be repaid at 3 times the cost.

    If you destroy 5 tech, you have to reimburse them 15.

    If you accidentally send their enemy 3 million, you have to send them 9. etc.

    GOONs was 5x and you had to post a plea for it to get accepted

  23. NPO Terms

    in Open World RP

    Posted · Edited by Mr.AdmiralX

    This is has been thrown around a few times I'm going to address it.

    Yes, it covers all of the reparations you have received. If there's any wars not listed there I don't remember them. However NPO has a history of being creative with harsh terms that aren't necessarily reparations, that you can't really put a monetary value on.

    It is important to note that at this time the -only- harsh term we've heard about is the war followed up by reparations. Here's some alternative terms I know offhand the NPO has handed out in the past that Karma won't touch because they go against their beliefs (and are in fact the Draconian terms that Archon initially said Karma would not incorporate. Any argument that large reps are draconian is a silly PR ploy)

    -Viceroys

    -Destruction of Wonders

    -Destruction of factories for the duration of terms (under the argument that they're a military improvement of course)

    -No first strike nuking in a war indefinitely

    -Reduction to 13 nukes spread among the entire alliance indefinitely.

    I'm sure there's more that I haven't thought of. I seem to remember moving another alliance to a different color sphere, but I'm not sure offhand if that was the NPO so I won't list it there. I'm sure others can add to this list. I'm pretty sure also that there was removal and/or perma-ZI of leadership/vocal members of losing alliances, but I can't remember for sure which war so I'm leaving that off the list until citing a source as well.

    So basically you don't like the reps and restrictions, consider them compensation for not having the above occuring to your alliance. I am fairly sure Karma would be willing to negotiate to include those terms and lower your reps in turn if you -really- think that the terms you've handed out in the past are better. (In fact I'm pretty sure at least one Karma leader has said he'd support letting you off with the exact terms you gave GPA). I've also made my set of suggestions for alternative punishments, but I've had people tell me they're way worse and seem to think that forced voluntary bill lock is a bad thing.

    As for color sphere, I dont believe NPO has forced an alliance to change colors. GOONs forced Loss to move, and were going to make Legion move but that term was removed. Also the factory thing I think was only done once.

×
×
  • Create New...