Maelstrom Vortex Posted July 31, 2009 Report Share Posted July 31, 2009 (edited) 1. Signatories agree not to start war with each other.2. Signatories of this treaty agree to free trade. 3. Signatories of this treaty grant freedom of military movement through their sovereign domains so long as the intent is solely transit. 4. Signatories of this treaty agree to allow the free flow of capital financing between their respective nations in terms of private investment and ownership. 5. Signatories of this treaty agree to share intelligence of any geo strategic threats to their partners as soon as they become aware. 6. The signatories agree that if one is attacked the other has the option of moving to defend the sovereignty of its treaty partner and would have all authorizations to land, air, and naval space needed to do so. 7. This treaty may be canceled anytime with a 24 hours Notice. Maelstrom Vortex, Triumvirate Adviser Signed for the Republic of Tasmania Kevin Stone, Head of State Edited August 3, 2009 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted July 31, 2009 Report Share Posted July 31, 2009 When Tasmania signs, we will issue our congratulations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 OOC: Basicaly, see the other economic treaty--same thing as that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 3. Signatories of this treaty grant freedom of military movement through their sovereign domains so long as the intent is solely transit. This is particularly worrying. If either of your nations becomes hostile towards New Zealand, this treaty allows for one to be non-neutral in the matter even without having a clause for aggression. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Kevz Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 Signed for the Republic of Tasmania Kevin Stone, Head of State Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted August 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 This is particularly worrying. If either of your nations becomes hostile towards New Zealand, this treaty allows for one to be non-neutral in the matter even without having a clause for aggression. We would propose that the easiest solution then is to avoid seeking military solutions to conflicts and determine them at the negotiations table. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDCJT Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 When Tasmania signs, we will issue our congratulations. Signed for the Republic of TasmaniaKevin Stone, Head of State We congratulates both Tasmania and the Dragon Empire on this! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun II Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 We would propose that the easiest solution then is to avoid seeking military solutions to conflicts and determine them at the negotiations table. Such threatening words worry us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted August 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 "Proposing discussion over military action is threatening? Sorry, it wasn't intended to be perceived as such." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted August 4, 2009 Report Share Posted August 4, 2009 Such threatening words worry us. "Proposing discussion over military action is threatening? Sorry, it wasn't intended to be perceived as such." While we disagree with some of the Empire's recent actions, we are confused by the obvious paranoia of New Zealand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.