Strykewolf Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 War slot filling....Blah Thought I'd comment on that. Any ways. The odd idea is this... Alliances carry over from round-to-round. Many times folks will ally with the same peeps. How about this. If you have allied with an alliance this round; you cannot ally with them in the next round. For example: Lets say that RD is allied with UW this round (which we are)....but, on reset, this next round...we cannot be. We work through this next round....and it ends. Since RD did not ally with UW this next round; we now can (if we and they wish to do so). It'd be an honor system thing and such... Thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOONS Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 Nope just wouldn't work,people would stay loyal to there old alliance and plus is fairly pointless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Benji Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 I don't mind the idea, but whats the point? I'm not trying to be rude, I literally mean it. What does this achieve? I'm not sure I understand the concept. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Adams Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 I don't think so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluRaider Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 People will still hold friendship and grudges over....It's a tendency of people Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Rune Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 And if someone does ally themselves with an ally from the previous round? Its not as of there's a lot can be done about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NuclearShawn Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 I think that Tournament Edition won't see the stagnation that Classic has. For one, every alliance wants to be on top, and has the potential to do so with every new round. Additionally, even if one alliance ends up having far more people then the others, the collective can still drop them to their knees because everyone starts out relatively equal (Trades excepted). As long as everyone keeps a competitive mindset, and tries to keep their own alliance on top, I think it'll stay interesting, particularly as rivalries develop and the like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owned-You Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 (edited) Violating Alliance Sovereignty...Isn't A Good Idea. (Edited For Clarity- My Post Was About The OP) Edited March 2, 2009 by Owned-You Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.