Varianz Posted February 15, 2009 Report Share Posted February 15, 2009 (edited) I'm sure everyone has noticed that the large numbers of treaties are making it hard to keep track of who's allied to who, and what kind of alliance it is, or if it's a NAP. I'd like to make it much simpler to keep track of this stuff. All alliances are invited to reply with a list of their treaties, as well as their official flag (if they have one) and I'll put them together into a TE treaty web, and post it for everyone to view. Caesar43 Edit- I know I could go back and research all the treaties, but that would take a forever and my work ethic only lasts so long . Edited February 15, 2009 by ceasar43 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daddyAGW Posted February 15, 2009 Report Share Posted February 15, 2009 I'm sure everyone has noticed that the large numbers of treaties are making it hard to keep track of who's allied to who, and what kind of alliance it is, or if it's a NAP. I'd like to make it much simpler to keep track of this stuff. All alliances are invited to reply with a list of their treaties, as well as their official flag (if they have one) and I'll put them together into a TE treaty web, and post it for everyone to view.Caesar43 Hail Ceasar Good idea and thanks for setting this up. 1 treaty-NAP with MHA. Can you use my avatar graphic for our alliance logo? cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varianz Posted February 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2009 Hail CeasarGood idea and thanks for setting this up. 1 treaty-NAP with MHA. Can you use my avatar graphic for our alliance logo? cheers No problem, thanks for the info! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borimir Resurrected Posted February 15, 2009 Report Share Posted February 15, 2009 This would be a nice idea for next round, but is it really necessary this late in the round, especially with so many treaties being cancelled? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varianz Posted February 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 15, 2009 This would be a nice idea for next round, but is it really necessary this late in the round, especially with so many treaties being cancelled? I figure a lot of treaties will stick around or be renewed for next round anyways, and it'll be easier to do this now when I have time and edit it next round when there won't be as much time. Either way, it's just easier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liluant Islands Posted February 15, 2009 Report Share Posted February 15, 2009 GREAT has 2 treaties MDoAP with RE MDoAP with GDA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Benji Posted February 15, 2009 Report Share Posted February 15, 2009 Shows how much you all fail when you need a treaty web for tournament edition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popsumpot Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 Shows how much you all fail when you need a treaty web for tournament edition. Says the guy with >9000 treaties.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Benji Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 Says the guy with >9000 treaties.. *I* have no treaties. The Wolverines has one treaty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burning Glory Posted February 18, 2009 Report Share Posted February 18, 2009 *I* have no treaties.The Wolverines has one treaty. Really? Then why did you jump in on the war with TPF? You had a NAP with us. and and MAoDP with GDA...Thats 2. Also didn't you join JR? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Muscarella Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 i'll have a flag made and post it sometime soon... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Benji Posted February 19, 2009 Report Share Posted February 19, 2009 Really? Then why did you jump in on the war with TPF? You had a NAP with us. and and MAoDP with GDA...Thats 2.Also didn't you join JR? Just a note, I am *NOT* Wolverines goverment. Nothing I say is official. We attacked TPF 'cos we wanted too. We attacked the same alliances JR were attacking because we wanted too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burning Glory Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Just a note, I am *NOT* Wolverines goverment. Nothing I say is official.We attacked TPF 'cos we wanted too. We attacked the same alliances JR were attacking because we wanted too. So then you can neither confirm nor deny, LOL!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Benji Posted February 21, 2009 Report Share Posted February 21, 2009 So then you can neither confirm nor deny, LOL!! Lol, good point. I should have tried harder to make people assume I was Wolverines goverment. MAI BAD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluRaider Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 Will you do the web for round 4?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth Muscarella Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 new flag image for the treaty web Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varianz Posted February 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 Will you do the web for round 4?? Yeah, I'll do a new web for round four. There are no treaties right now, but once people start signing them I'll set one up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts