KCToker Posted January 5, 2008 Report Share Posted January 5, 2008 Would it be possible for some way to denote who is currently sanctioned? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floatsam Posted January 5, 2008 Report Share Posted January 5, 2008 Echelon requested that short form a while back. I don't get it either. Ah, thanks, that makes sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted January 6, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 6, 2008 Updated 2008-01-06. We liked it more than Ech, but if you can fit Echelon in there go ahead then again it is your thread and you can do whatever you want with it Ah, thanks, that makes sense. It's probably just me, then. Would it be possible for some way to denote who is currently sanctioned? That's not really a problem I've ever thought to address. They're the 12 alliances on the alliance stats page. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KCToker Posted January 6, 2008 Report Share Posted January 6, 2008 (edited) That's not really a problem I've ever thought to address. They're the 12 alliances on the alliance stats page. But then I have to do something XD EDIT: lol @ R&R's growth Edited January 6, 2008 by KCToker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Great Khan Posted January 7, 2008 Report Share Posted January 7, 2008 QUOTE (The Great Khan @ Jan 1 2008, 06:34 AM) Illuminati + 69 % score technically you cant call us TWNO on the graph now, has to be Illuminati great graphs Any particular reason? technically TWNO is a subdivision of the Illuminati as a collective (thanks to the big biz merge) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted January 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 8, 2008 Updated 2008-01-07. technically TWNO is a subdivision of the Illuminati as a collective (thanks to the big biz merge) So I hear. It's been changed for several days now. I was just curious, because some time ago I was asked to change it from Illuminati to TNWO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted January 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 8, 2008 (edited) Edit: Double posts do it twice. Edited January 8, 2008 by Unspeakable Evil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted January 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 Updated 2008-01-08. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scalare Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 (edited) Updated 2008-01-08. Merci beaucoup! This is a message to indicate that the above sentence means 'Thanks a lot' in French. Edited January 9, 2008 by Scalare Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scalare Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 (edited) Edit: something went VERY wrong while posting this. Sorry people, feel free to delete this message Edited January 9, 2008 by Scalare Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scalare Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 (edited) Edit: something went VERY wrong while posting this. Sorry people, feel free to delete this message Edited January 9, 2008 by Scalare Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scalare Posted January 9, 2008 Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 (edited) Edit: something went VERY wrong while posting this. Sorry people, feel free to delete this message Edited January 9, 2008 by Scalare Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted January 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 9, 2008 (edited) Edit: something went VERY wrong while posting this. Sorry people, feel free to delete this message I'm seeing double -- an octuple post! Edited January 9, 2008 by Unspeakable Evil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted January 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2008 Updated 2008-01-09. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted January 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2008 Updated 2008-01-10. Note the PANS graphs -- they are back. They look a bit odd, but that's because 10 weeks ago tomorrow Admin tweaked the NS calculations. Tomorrow they'll look less weird. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julius-Kaiser Posted January 11, 2008 Report Share Posted January 11, 2008 Updated 2008-01-10. Note the PANS graphs -- they are back. They look a bit odd, but that's because 10 weeks ago tomorrow Admin tweaked the NS calculations. Tomorrow they'll look less weird. I think they would look better when you have the alliances in the PANS graphs in order of their NS, because comparing works better when your comparing smaller alliances to smaller alliances, instead of it all being kind of jumbly like it is now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted January 11, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 11, 2008 (edited) I think they would look better when you have the alliances in the PANS graphs in order of their NS, because comparing works better when your comparing smaller alliances to smaller alliances, instead of it all being kind of jumbly like it is now. They're actually sorted now by percent growth versus 10 weeks ago or whenever I started tracking them. Smaller alliances (by NS) just tend to grow more quickly than larger ones (by NS). I expect it'll unjumble itself a bit tomorrow once that average loss of 30% NS drops off. I also plan to do some paring down of the Y axis, and possibly reducing the date range from 10 weeks. I'm gonna see how it does for now, but I could now relatively easily make a new set of PANS graphs that for (say) the 4 week window ending today. I might play around with it some this weekend. Edited January 11, 2008 by Unspeakable Evil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFinalHero Posted January 11, 2008 Report Share Posted January 11, 2008 I'm just pumped that VE is so close to being graphed with all this growth Just a few more spots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted January 11, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 11, 2008 Updated 2008-01-11. I'm just pumped that VE is so close to being graphed with all this growth Just a few more spots. From 10 weeks ago, the 3rd fastest growing alliance, behind Illuminati and TOOL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted January 12, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2008 Updated 2008-01-12. And someone new has rejoined the 30k average NS club again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scalare Posted January 12, 2008 Report Share Posted January 12, 2008 (edited) Grr, we'll get you next time, Grämlins. Next time! Edited January 12, 2008 by Scalare Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HordeOfDoom Posted January 13, 2008 Report Share Posted January 13, 2008 Stats are boring without enemies. Someone start a rival bloc so I can classify what these stats mean to CN in general Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted January 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 13, 2008 Updated 2008-01-13. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpreb Posted January 13, 2008 Report Share Posted January 13, 2008 Updated 2008-01-12. And someone new has rejoined the 30k average NS club again. We might not be the best in growing but we do it steady upwards. Still a good job from you UE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unspeakable Evil Posted January 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2008 (edited) Updated 2008-01-16. Not dead, just facing an unlikely cascade of irritating connectivity conundrums culminating concordantly in crashes that could cause crud. They all seem fixed for the time being, after I made a sacrifice to the dark and arcane gods of networking. I need sleeeep. Edited January 16, 2008 by Unspeakable Evil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.