Jump to content

HordeOfDoom

Banned
  • Posts

    3,708
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by HordeOfDoom

  1. I believe he means membership-wise. http://www.cybernations.net/allAlliances_d...d=Total_Nations
  2. This seemed like an appropriate place to raise the point that, whereas in previous wars (ex. GW III Legion) large losses were generated mostly by swathes of members leaving, and somewhat by actual material losses. We see now that, with all the new additions and greater destruction of warfare, losses have reached the point where simple defeats on the battlefield can equal the losses suffered during a run by the alliance's membership (As can be seen by Polars large losses while membership remains stable, as no individual surrender terms have been offered).
  3. Uh... those numbers simply go further toward proving exactly what I'm saying. What's your point?
  4. All it means is that far more of your nations are bill-locked than ours (hence their strength is not updating as they are not doing transactions, as opposed to ours who are still making transactions, even if they are losing strength). The full losses are impossible to properly analyze while a war is ongoing, but the normal trend is that the losses of those being stomped are underrepresented, while those of the 'stompers' are shown in full. I expect this is the case here. Do I really have to repeat this every war?
  5. I assume you're referring to the red 'Actions Today'. This limit has been in the game for quite some time. If you conduct 1000 actions within a single day, your account is locked until the next update. Not sure when the red warning text appears, probably at 700 or 750.
  6. As someone else who is currently sanctioned, I can confirm you are unable to initiate secret trades after being sanctioned.
  7. I love nukes long time And if that many hit, imagine how many were killed by SDIs/destroyed by spies. That's a lot of nukes.
  8. Well, there's nothing stopping you from bringing it back now
  9. They show who's gearing up for war, who's at war, and who's losing a war?
  10. Yeah, I don't think the add/drop lines are relevant anymore. Just keep the field fixed for a while.
  11. hmmm now why could that be :jihad:
  12. I don't think most of you understand how CN:TE plays out. If an alliance wants to come back, they do, there's hardly anything threatening to stop them from doing so. Oh no, I'm going to be ZIed in a game that resets every month? THE HORROR!!!! CN:TE = stuff blowing up. constantly. \m/ >_< \m/
  13. \m/ >_< \m/ I'm in ur game, ruinin ur natiunz.
  14. aka OG and CSN should not have been added.
  15. I go away for a month, and upon my return that Anu character has infiltrated my alliance? I should have stayed in Vegas, things were less crazy there.
  16. I assume you will be adding a naval graph? (They're now tracked in-game on the alliance page)
  17. Actually I'm pretty sure the NpO lost more than that only a couple days ago. And Gramlins certainly lost more than that when the FnF Multies were deleted (somewhere in the range of 1 point + iirc) Anyways, big, but not biggest
  18. Looks fine for me too. And how I love the Tank graph: Looks like FOK went off high alert yesterday
×
×
  • Create New...