Cesar Julian

Sad to read this. Wish you the best.

o/GUN o/ADI Together for a better future.

I mirror the sentiment of my fellow GUNners. This is a great time for us. The reason we had that crash diet the last 2 weeks was to be able to fit in our tuxedos for this party o/GUN o/NATO

o/GUN o/NATO o/ those who fought with us during this conflict o/peace Feel obligated to give a shout out to the WAPA nations I fought. You guys were great, maybe we'll meet again. I'm proud of my alliance and on what we were able to accomplish. We did what we came here to do and that's all that matters.

[quote name='arani' date='18 February 2010 - 11:44 PM' timestamp='1266536688' post='2190544'] Most, and I would venture all current POW's from WAPA, (Andover excepted of course), are loyal members, who surrendered because they were unprepared for this war,and wanted to be more capable of rebuilding WAPA and our allies after the war. So you'll excuse me if I tell you to bug off. [/quote] I didn't imply anything. Just gave advice based on a hypothetical situation in which I also stated I lacked knowledge of some of the specifics. I also specifically said "those nations that, like Andover, had left the alliance" meaning that they are not loyal to WAPA anymore. I'm not going to counter anything you say as you should know far more than me on the matter considering that is your alliance. I do not question the loyalty of any of your members, and as a matter of fact I myself have been witness to the amount of loyalty some of your members have. They are good people, that just happen to be on the opposing side of the war from me. Forgive me for just giving an idea, and you'll excuse me if I tell you to chill. Edit: Crappy grammar mistake.

Not a government member and speak only for myself. As long as all the surrender terms are met I don't see why the new alliance should be disbanded. However I suggest some caution. You created this alliance while being under surrender terms. This new alliance of yours I think should also comply with the terms establishing neutrality and no aid to nations currently in the war, at least until you are released. I think that is fair. Once you are free then go have a happy alliance, do what you will and you have my best wishes for success. ------ This is just me answering to the topic of the thread, just an idea for you to consider. You could consider recruiting from WAPA members that left the alliance after/during the war, like yourself. I don't know how WAPA handles surrender cases, but if some good people you know are now without an alliance you could try to get a few to join.

[quote name='Axel Kaiserfaust' date='14 February 2010 - 06:55 PM' timestamp='1266173729' post='2181006'] I surrender to TPE Alliance, specifically Cesar Julian. I resign from the war, stop bombing the hell outta me already. [/quote] To fix this. He surrenders to the Global United Nations, not TPE. As matter of fact TPE is on their side also fighting against GUN. I'll take it as an honest mistake and accept his surrender.

I'm also in for the meat Nice poem.

Good luck to our WAPA opponents, let this be a clean and honorable fight. Renewal underway o/ GUN

1 more slot open 3m/50T Slot now full

The 3 million/50 Tech deal is more than just doubling the seller's profit. Aside from that, he only needs to use the slot for 20 days instead pf 30, which in turn means more deals which means even more profit. If sellers could send 100 in 20 days you would see more 3/m100T deals. I'm not saying the cap should be raised though. I've sold 700 Tech, 200 were on 3m/100t and to my alliance, the other 500 were 3m/50t.

RL Cold War had Korean War, Afghanistan War, Vietnam War, along with some other small conflicts. Lack of fighting =/= Cold War. ...just saying

1 slot open Selling 50 Tech for 3 Million Slot Full

1 slot open 3M/50T

Accepted Edit: Slots now Full

2 Slots open 3million/50 Tech Money first

That is probably true. However, given how we can't say that with all certainty the example still works for what I was trying to say.

The thing is that unless the strike is extremely well planned and/or researched, You might end up declaring on someone who wasn't going to enter the war in the first place. So now you have to deal with not only the ones that end up entering the war, but the one you attacked. Biggest example being Pearl Harbor in RL. Preemptive strikes can give you an edge because of the surprise factor plus first blitz, but they come with high risk that most times it's not necessary to take.

Sorry, someone already sent me the offer. Slots now full. For future reference, money first. Happy Holidays.

Have 1 slot open for a 3M/50T deal, if anyone is interested.

Team: Aqua Nation name: Aguadilla Ruler: Cesar Juian Resources: Oil & Marble Want: Gold & Silver Don't care which team you have, I need them fast. Nation Link is in my sig.

Accepted and slots are now full. Thank You.

Selling 50 Tech for 3 million 1 slot open Will deliver on time.

In my case I prefer 1x1, because it's simpler and I only have to worry about myself. Also allows me to be perfectly on time which is something I'm proud of and have never failed to do. Plus it gives me 10 days of enjoying 50 Tech I wouldn't have otherwise. When it comes to price I try to find a middle ground between standard price and 3/50 'charity' price. In my last mass sell I asked for 3/50 all the way because I'm preparing for my first Infra jump. In a normal situation I would be fine with 2.75-2.5/50. In reality though the market is very good for sellers and one can pretty much get a 3/50 easily if you look for it; and if you can, then why not do it?

You can always pass by the Bettor's Lounge and bet on the fights. You could leave with shiny brand new Tech.