Jump to content

Denial

Banned
  • Posts

    2,860
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Denial

  1. [quote name='EpsilonPhoenix' timestamp='1313271229' post='2779938']
    God help us if MK and NPO settle their differences and merge.
    [/quote]
    Well, they [i]are[/i] our most highly regarded ODP partner.

    Who knows what the future holds!

  2. [quote name='Bob Janova' timestamp='1313268545' post='2779877']
    All I'm confused about is why you bothered signing that ODP. If your objective was to create a binding tie, then why not just go straight for this in the first place? I can't believe that anything significant has changed between the two treaties.[/quote]
    A great deal has indeed changed within the last few weeks. Just because you aren't privy to something doesn't mean it hasn't happened.

  3. [quote name='Haflinger' timestamp='1313199495' post='2779002']
    TOP and Polar are the two obvious choices, when going down the list of alliances that put you in power in Karma.
    [/quote]
    Everyone, Haflinger is right. The game is up - it's time to admit it. You see, to hunt down and kill TOP and Polar, we orchestrated a brilliant plan whereby we mind-manipulated Polar into a moral crusade that we simultaneously warned them against, and then jedi mind-tricked TOP into 'pre-emptively' attacking our entire bloc. But only after persuading Polar to give TOP their word that such an attack would be feasible and face little to no backlash. You think that's the extent of our underhanded plotting? Oh no, think again! We didn't stop there. Part way through the war, we managed to once again take hold of Polar's puppet strings and have them throw themselves against our enemies.

    Our treachery knows no bounds!

    [quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1313199705' post='2779006']
    You guys pretty much used Polar and then threw them away like a dirty tampon.[/quote]
    While I don't object to the comparison between Polar and a dirty tampon, to suggest that we somehow 'used' Polar is hilarious. I would love to hear you elaborate on this.

    [quote]
    I'm so un-informed I know about secret posts in FOK private areas. You got me there. :rolleyes:
    [/quote]
    So, you're on par with every other pleb that scours CNTel for insight. Good job.

  4. [quote name='Merrie Melodies' timestamp='1313193000' post='2778946']
    And so, now, MK has truly attained NPO's former roll, shall their fate be the same?
    [/quote]
    Hey, we've acquired none of NPO's baked goods. I am quite shocked you'd make such an accusation.

  5. [quote name='ShadowDragon' timestamp='1312437202' post='2771572']
    As information gets passed around, it gets twisted and spun by small degrees. Each person conveys it with their own emphasis, their own interpretations and colored by their own set of personal beliefs.
    [/quote]
    That's probably the best summation of Super Friends' foreign policy I've seen in a while.

  6. [quote name='Dajobo' timestamp='1309243455' post='2743299']
    I don't see anyone upset by it except maybe some people who trusted MK.
    For their allies or former allies though it's an ugly precedent. They now know that anything they say, or have ever said to MK is not private if they ever find themselves in a different political position. The curious part of me now wishes I was a member of MK in one regard, because it would be fascinating to see if it has an effect on what people say to them in their embassies. The option for private diplomacy for MK has probably gone out the window now as well, as this isn't a forum leak but a decision by their Government.

    All in all a job well done :D
    [/quote]
    If it stops alliances sending over morons who post emoticon-riddled !@#$%^&* within self-initiated Q&As we have no desire to participate in, this will all have been worth it.

  7. [quote name='Ruler with Plan X' timestamp='1308810450' post='2739162']
    I'm sorry that we do not roll alliances for OOC reasons, but the topic of discussion here is our shuttering of consulates. If you want to have a discussion about the use of OOC CBs as being legitimate I'd do that elsewhere.
    [/quote]
    Yes, you just stick to piss-poor jokes and pressuring other alliances to drop their ties with Nordreich for 'OOC reasons'.

×
×
  • Create New...