Thrash

Our intention is merely to allow NWO to grow, sell tech to us should they have it available, be safe from attacks, and consult us regarding their FA issues. If this reads different to everyone, then I suppose a revision is in order. Nowhere does it say they have to abide by our FA decisions, only to consult us. I suppose the military section could be a bit revised, because we wouldn't require them to assist us should we be under attack.

It's not a matter of that, it's a matter of claims of us trying to take an upper-hand.

This treaty was pushed through quickly as a result of repeat attacks upon NWO, and is completely open to revisions. Should everyone desire the need to nitpick, how about we just look at the tl;dr and pay attention to that. GDA is not out to screw anyone over, nor do we have some master plan in mind. Perhaps if we just came out with "we will do tech deals with NWO, and protect them from attacks" that would have satisfied everyone. That's essentially the plan here, and people who are reading more into it truly have too much time. This is the draft we received and it looked reasonable to us. We are not looking to gain an upper-hand by some unreasonable means. Contrary to popular belief, there's not a hidden plan behind every alliance's actions.

:lol: Now there's a name I haven't heard in a long time!

Yea, I caught the missing sigs right after posting..

tl;dr: An attack on NWO is an attack on GDA o/ GDA o/ NWO Looking forward to a long lasting friendship!

Oh yea, how could I forget?

Congrats, guys!

Posting for this NADC guy who doesn't have an account on CN forums but posted on BLEU forums