Jump to content

metal

Banned
  • Posts

    184
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by metal

  1. Your honestly telling me that removing sanctions in a war your supposedly neutral in wouldn't compromise that neutrality??
  2. Out of curiosity.. removing sanctions on NAAW nations would be pretty un-neutral as well right?
  3. I'm well aware of that. I'll be curious to see what happens in 3 days. I was just assuming by his anger-filled message he was still enraged. Enraged folks usually don't want to let up.
  4. The point is: He's currently a DCS member with outstanding sanctions against BW members. All while claiming he's neutral. You cant place sanctions, hop AA's , DONT remove them, then say ... oh I'm neutral you guys should leave me alone.
  5. Like I told DCS prior to their formation. Remove all sanctions from us or our allies, sign a NAP with us so it doesn't happen again, and I'll lift ours from them and we can all go about our merry way. They chose to sanction however.
  6. <Sethly|NAAW> well i think avenger was still in naaw <metal> I dont remember, but hes in DCS now <Sethly|NAAW> heh <metal> so if a DCS senator has outstanding sanctions on a BW member <metal> hes not very neutral, is he? <Sethly|NAAW> isnt there like a 3 day wait before you can remove them? <metal> yeah <metal> I got a feeling by his angry messages... he wasnt going to be doing that. <metal> but we'll see I guess. Might as well just copy/paste rather than re-write it for all onlookers metal = titanium
  7. I sanctioned the top 5 nations of NAAW. No one was DCS at the time. You can't say I sanctioned DCS, when DCS didn't even exist.
  8. Absolutely not. However, people are human. I'd still expect grudges to be held. I'd hope them not to be acted on.
  9. Striker, I'm confused, if your neutral in this, why did a DCS nation sanction Blackwater nations?
  10. So since not all 150 nations are on our 30 or so you should be commended for your merciful actions??? This just keeps getting better and better. Bill, Get this guy a gag order, he's killin' whatever hard work you've put into this. It's gettin ugly.
  11. "NAAW Sethly" speaks again. "Fair is fair, until it happens to us, then fair play has clearly been twisted" "We may have killed thousands of your men, but what your doing is clearly war-mongering!" "It is clearly our conservative actions that have kept Blackwater alive. Praise the merciful NAAW"
  12. LOL. That might be the most hilarious post ever posted during the duration of this event. Yeah.... terribly conservative by 1) Initiating an attack on a established alliance 2) First-strike nuking that same alliance 3) Being the first to attempt to destroy nukes via spy attacks on that same alliance. If that's NAAW's definition of "conservative" I can tell why others have taken so much exception to this incident and have stepped in from preventing further NAAW "conservative actions". If the above actions constitutes "sacrificing to keep us around" - I'd rather you have not.
  13. Sounds like a no to me. Lock it up black-hearted Shade. I'm going to see if I can get an all-inclusive vacation to PSYIENCE included in the next set of terms. I need it after this.
  14. Are you suggesting we're just pawns in "their" great master plan? Because I'm not sure "they" could have counted on an alliance our size sticking up to an alliance your size. Maybe it just worked out right. I feel used. Hey - you also got a Archnemesis. Don't forget that.
  15. The 28th WAS the declaration date. The 28th was ALSO the date that Shade received and granted your requests for peace. BW soldiers follow orders. Peace was either in the box or on its way I'm sure. We do see all those wars did peace. The bigger problem (and irrefutable portion) is the 29th and 30th - those six aggressive wars look mighty bad on NAAW.
  16. Oh and.. from what I hear via underground correspondence with the black-hearted Shade no "dragging" was necessary. I was even like "nah, we got this". But apparently your "side" isn't coming across in the best of light through all this. *shrugs*
  17. Archnemesis Bill, Your losing your touch. If only you guys would have had this mindset PRIOR to it getting dangerous for you. Like the 28th when BW nations were peacing, and 6 aggressive wars followed. Right about somewhere in there would have been a great place to have this mindset. You know.. before launching the nukes, and before the spy attacks.
  18. It's "NAAW Sethly" ! WE HAVE NO NATIONS IN ANARCHY THE CAPITAL IS SECURE
  19. For what it's worth, I never refused peace. The black-hearted grinch-like figure of Shade and Coalition had a pow-wow, came up with some top secret plans I guess. I wasn't in on any of that. Believe it or not. o/ NAAW and the most profitable raid in history! ... oh wait... Hey look at it this way, earlier you said you had 40 nations as personal tech farms, that number increased exponentially, you should be thrilled!
  20. While I appreciate your unrelenting nature Archnemesis, we've covered this before. Try not raiding aligned nations, it will work out better for you. -Titanium , the 'escalador' of wars.
  21. Looks like the proverbial "line in the sand" had been crossed way back somewhere in between getting raided, nuked, and spied upon.
  22. Wow... impressive. I now understand why NAAW's tone changed towards me in the last 24 hours. No wonder you guys wanted peace so bad. Here I thought it was cause I had grown on you.
  23. Looks like it IS confirmed. Shade's heart is indeed black. The BW:TE Commanders will shall be done. The only thing left for me to do is cite a quote from a famous poet: "Don't start none, won't be none". The policy of raiding aligned nations doesn't appear to have worked out.
×
×
  • Create New...