Jump to content

flak attack

Members
  • Posts

    4,016
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by flak attack

  1. [quote name='muwen1234' timestamp='1340264508' post='2991637'] $%&@ you. Apparently the default government for MK nations is Anarchy. o/NATO!!! [/quote] Only of the nuclear variety. Gotta give our citizens what they demand.
  2. [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1340277211' post='2991724'] It worked before. The tears flowed quite a bit. [/quote] There's a big difference in implementation between this and the way NPO did it. Problematically for them, they've already pretty much screwed up their chances of doing it right.
  3. [quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1340273959' post='2991696'] 'Nuff Said. Contradictory Kingdom? I think so! [/quote] It's almost like you're trying to get as close to our point as possible without ever actually getting there.
  4. [quote name='Methrage' timestamp='1340264675' post='2991639'] Are you really threatening perma-war with every alliance who declares on you guys? You're in for a long war, enjoy. [/quote] That's usually how it works, yes.
  5. [quote name='rsoxbronco1' timestamp='1340260909' post='2991595'] http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=14351 "1. The GPA agrees to provide reparations in the form of 10,000 technology to each of the Continuum alliances directly engaged in the present war." You mean like that? [/quote] Watch out man. You keep posting like that and he's going to expect us to read thirty pages about how the GPA deserved it for saying mean things to him. [quote name='Seerow' timestamp='1340260986' post='2991598'] Here's a tip: If you're relying on reparations to build your nations, you're probably doing something wrong. I've noticed reparations actually tend to cause the nation receiving them to lose efficiency due to delays in packages being sent, and later when it's over those who were receiving reps getting lazy. Seriously, compare our tech growth with TOP's between the last war and now. I'm pretty sure MK gained more despite not getting any reps at all. [/quote] This is correct. If you're an active alliance, you don't charge reps because you want tech. You do it as punishment.
  6. [quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1340260803' post='2991591'] That sounds really useful to you right now [/quote] Considering our policy on accepting alliance surrenders, it is.
  7. [quote name='Perceus' timestamp='1340259484' post='2991560'] well, Im sorry, see in NATO, no tier sucks. now if thats not the case in MK and your low tier nations suck, well, what a great kingdom you guys have! That, my friend, is laughable. [/quote] Your entire alliance's combat capabilities are a joke. To start, your upper tier is terrible and consists of only a small number of nations. Of them, only one has more tech than infra and several are pushing twice as much infra as tech. That's a big no-no in the world of large nation combat. MK alone has 17 members with more tech than your highest tech nation. Your middle tier is also woefully low on tech as well, not to mention lacking in the WRCs needed to make the tech that they do have actually count for something. Your bottom tier is quite large in membership, but it's still small and easily rebuilt if given the proper aid, making damage dealt by nations here irrelevant, so I'm not even going to bother actually looking at their nations.
  8. [quote name='Perceus' timestamp='1340258305' post='2991528'] oh you mean THOSE three, yeah no that was on purpose, we wanted to be fair and give YOU specifically a head start. boy oh boy, you caught a ghost! Thank you very much for the ghost busting, now would you like a cookie for that? [/quote] Unless you're at two nations trying to surrender already, it's not a nation rsox is at war with that he's referring to.
  9. [quote name='rsoxbronco1' timestamp='1340257875' post='2991513'] Well I must say, NATO has been quite impressive this war. You almost made it 2 full hours without one of your members trying to surrender. [/quote] It is a truly awe inspiring record they have set. It's a shame they didn't make it to 3 hours without a surrender attempt. That would have been extremely impressive.
  10. [quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1340256189' post='2991466'] Link is 404. [/quote] I fixed it for you.
  11. [quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1340255409' post='2991437'] Yeah man I will literally never get tired of nuking you [/quote] In case you want to do more than just blow hot air, you can find me here: http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=167132 3 open slots. There's no excuse for that.
  12. [quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1340255256' post='2991430'] How about we just never let this war end [/quote] Hey, if that's what you want, I'm down. Just remember that you asked for this in a year when you're on your knees begging for peace.
  13. [quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1340254392' post='2991395'] MK suddenly very concerned about LSF [/quote] We're believers in equal press time.
  14. [quote name='Sir Humphrey' timestamp='1340252900' post='2991284'] Ah, you are the one that is trying to elawyer our 3 strikes rule. I thought it was pretty clear. It's an oA. Get over it. [/quote] You caught me. That's why I mentioned your alliance so many times in that post. Quite frankly, I don't really care that your alliance is at war with us. You're nothing but a flea to be swatted.
  15. [quote name='Banksy' timestamp='1340253886' post='2991364'] there is one more war now but he's attacking a ghost. [/quote] This whole only attack tiny nations thing the other side has going is going to be great for our ghost problem.
  16. [quote name='supercoolyellow' timestamp='1340253774' post='2991350'] Some alliances on the winning side are going to take more damage than others, and its beautiful. [/quote] We're used to this. Within a week you're all running and screaming in peace mode and there's no one left for us to fight. Don't get ahead of yourselves.
  17. [quote name='katashimon13' timestamp='1340253519' post='2991340'] not enough... slots @_@ have fun sparta rawr [/quote] This should help: http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=166226 http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=142641 http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=10294 http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=85905 http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=35349 http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=135726 http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=323589 http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=87642 http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=167132 http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=243923 http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=64927 http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=224625 http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=33197 http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=233211 http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=111442
  18. [quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1340251810' post='2991228'] MK attacked CSN, you can attempt to e-lawyer(you're great at it) as much as you'd like, it doesn't change the fact MK declared war on CSN. [/quote] NPO has no MDP with CSN, you can attempt to e-lawyer(you're terrible at it) as much as you'd like, it doesn't change the fact NPO has no MDP with CSN.
  19. It's amazing how nice your coalition is. You're throwing every single alliance I want to perma-war at us.
  20. [quote name='Ayatollah Bromeini' timestamp='1340245429' post='2990976'] Woah now, don't shoot the messenger. I was merely doing the bidding of my benevolent overlords (in all seriousness I had no idea what was going on when I was asked to do this. ) [/quote] That's quite alright. As per CSN's example, you have done nothing wrong and are allowed to join MK, if you chose.
  21. [quote name='Banksy' timestamp='1340244098' post='2990936'] yeah, was q even a *thing?* [/quote] Seriously. NPO was the alliance people were most afraid to fight. No one was worried about Gre, TOP or IRON. Everyone knew they weren't the real power behind NPO.
  22. And? We have already discussed the issue with Trotsky. He may join our alliance if he wishes.
  23. [quote name='Mr Magorium' timestamp='1340241076' post='2990858'] Ofcause you are and dont be! Your PR will go the same way as her infra. Seriously if she really had 'stolen' private info about you and other and maybe even used it to threaten you and others, then you would not be sending her into zi. You would PZ her! Beside 'i cant tell you' is to weak! [/quote] We're not telling you because the screenshots contained intimate details about the private life of one of our members. It seems counter productive to show private screenshots to everyone, doesn't it?
  24. [quote name='SpacingOutMan' timestamp='1340238590' post='2990825'] Something about clams and oysters apparently. Guess we'll all find out soon enough. [/quote] If that's what you actually think that's about, you're not very good at reading between the lines.
  25. [quote name='Mr Magorium' timestamp='1340237284' post='2990800'] This has everything to do with it! Colleting information about your foe durring war is a normal thing to do! and the fact that you try and paint it as anything else is a joke! [/quote] The information collected has absolutely nothing to do with current events in CN nor did it ever.
×
×
  • Create New...