Jump to content

DaarioNaharis

Members
  • Posts

    200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DaarioNaharis

  1. Well, more money will just mean bigger nations, so 50 millions will have nations half as big as now, and lets say 200 million will have nations twice as big (on average), if you are not good at money management or war chest skills, start up money wont make a big difference, you will either end up big with no money, or small with too much money.

     

    with 10 million we had CIA rouges, with 100 million we have nuclear rouges, we will always have rouges, so i agree with cowboy on that one.

     

    i would like to see a billion, at some point, and i think the idea of changing the start up money each round is a great idea, but i think it should be a bigger scale than 10 million, 50 million ,100millon..

     

    i would suggest it be a*10 million where a>=1 and is a multiple of 10, so would go 10 million, 100 million, 1 billion, 10 billion....

     

    but i am also ok with going back to the old way, i like this game regardless of average nation size :)

  2. Good job   Lord Strum  nobody can say where is the stats  that says it all  Simple, easy and complete.

     

    Hope both groups have a good time,

     

     

    Anyone want to buy some  weapons from ACME Labs... we are  "A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Of Roadrunner Corporation"  

    Lol, agreed, i like the idea of posting stats in screenshots, well done.

    Enjoy the war everyone

  3. This could be implemented in SE and TE, but since i'm active in TE i'll post it here.

    This game is awesome, and waring is a big thrill, but a bit more visual stimulation would make it even more fun, so i suggest you use GIFs for wars instead of JPEG or PNG..etc

    it is smaller in size, would look way more fun, and you can make it some sort of a contest where members suggest different GIFs for different scenarios (Nuking, Cruising, Aggressive attacks.....) and then pick the ones you like best (with paying attention to the rights of this GIFs, i'm not a lawyer, but i assume you can get sued if you use the wrong pic).

     

    You can also have an array of different GIFs for each scenario, and every time that scenario gets called(lets say aircraft attack), you have a function that pics a GIF from that array at random (given that this function won't slow things down). 

  4. We have peace today.

    as one of my members put it, "misfits are glorious fighters".

    others were less active than we expected, but still the ones who fought, fought well.

    We all enjoyed the war, and hope to meet on the battlefield once again someday.

     

    Thanks everyone for the great fight.

     

    o7 Misfits

    o7 Together as One

    o7 Peace Choice

    o7 KrAbZ!

    o7 Peace

  5. Eurasia Members: I get your complaints that D1 & RE don't have the moral high ground they are claiming to have, they don't, that is obvious, you are a new alliance playing the SE kind of gameplay, as i explained here, it does not work.

     

    this NDO trolling you're doing is wrong,the declaration was wrong, and no matter how much i disagree and dislike D1&RE, i will not deny that they made the right move to defend NDO, if they didn't someone else would have, however the way they did it was fine at the start, but now its just stupid.

     

    RoadRash leaving is a great loss to the TE community and i for one would hate to see that happen, he is no hypocrite, he plays for fun and holds no grudges,he is right to complain, and he is right in his claim that if you're gameplay stays this way, that won't sit well with the other alliances in TE (not meaning that as a threat, but as an observation from past somewhat similar actions done by big alliances in TE).

     

    I would request you compromise and make peace with people you dislike, for the sake of NDO, it is logical, that they won't leave the people who helped them in war and i completely understand RoadRash doing that, i would have done the same if i was in his place.

     

    I can see in the other thread, that peace or cease fire, or what ever that should be was achieved,that is a start, believe me, i 100% understand your complaints about D1 & RE, but you are WRONG about NDO. only for the sake of the game & NDO, compromise and come out as the bigger guys .

     

    Best Regards,

    Robert Baratheon

  6. Dario, stick your nose where it belongs teaching your newbies.  As for Eurasia they still hitting NDO to this day (multi wars), no let up on NDO.  Our negotiations for peace were yes peace we will peace out stop actions to NDO (4 days ago).  The famous DeadOne, mumbled we not offering peace yet, we moved to another negotiator and his plee w/ the DeadOne was even worse response.  Let the DeadOne step down, his nations will soon see he has no regard but to his pride.  Once all wars are stopped on a unconditional  non agreement (NDO) just plane stopped.  D1 will have talks to send peace with others.  Until DeadOne is gone, his legacy will shrink and burn w/his nations.

     

    The DeadOnes offering for a approach too him now is absurd for NDO to have peace.  This message here is to Eurasia:

     

    Stop all wars to immediately (to NDO) send peace, your gov cant speak for you.  Your leader is Dead!  Send a new party to D1 we will stop the maddness!

     

    It's hilarious that you think this kind of talk will intimidate me, this conflict would have been over way earlier if you know how to talk like a normal person, and not just order people who really don't give a fuck about your orders, boy.

    it's just proving my point more that you can only speak like bully.

  7.  

    I would like to think our words, at least, are generally slightly more polite than that.

    But you are correct. We have very little regard for the way things are done here. When a predecessor alliance of Eurasia came into the game it was immediately raided, and when it fought back it was countered with overwhelming force. Eurasia has no respect for such actions.

    Earlier this round, alliances that now, declaring themselves to be acting in the name of morality, march against us, attacked alliances in what surely must be classified as a down declare. They used tactics that cannot be considered sportsmanlike and they launched spy attacks that while we see as valid they claimed in the Declaration of War to classify as 'dirty' and pledged not to use. Eurasia has no respect for such hypocrisy.

    So yes, alliances such as RE and DEFCON can 'go suck it' as you so succinctly put it. If they have so little regard for the agreement that governs this world then I do not see why Eurasia must hold it in any regard.

    However, not all alliances in this world act like those two. I do not yet have enough information to pass judgement, but from what others have said and my own observations of their actions there are some such as your own that do act in a fashion closer to the fashion one would expect given the agreement and those alliances we do hold in far higher regard than those alliances whose actions reek of hypocrisy.

    Due to this, and due to the fact that while we find the actual agreement to be nothing more than hot air, I do believe that the intent of the agreement is a noble one, and as such I publicly re-state an offer of peace to the New Desolate Order on behalf of Eurasia; we have no reason to desire this war to continue.

    If you wish to accept get in contact with me by any means and we will see the war ended as quickly as is practicable.

    You are absolutely 100% right, Defcon1 one and RE sh*t on this agreement they defend whenever it suits them and they should go suck it, and stop acting like they are the defender of justice around here, you can ask the former leaders of nightmare movement last round and hear for your self how big a of a sh*t D1 and RE gave about the agreement they defend.

    NDO, is one of the alliances that is very different from this big collection of hypocrites and bullies usually known as D1&RE, they play the game honorably, and the consider making war fun for other people, and not just crippling them and destroying them(example: their war with TPC, another awesome honorable alliance), everyone should take example of their gameplay and try to follow their lead.

    I am glad that Eurasia sees that NDO are good people.

    The "unwritten agreement" is definitely hot air, it is "unwritten" so it is expected of new alliances to follow it without ever hearing of it, and when they unintentionally break it (usually because they are used to an SE type of gameplay, that given TEs "no foreign aid" rule & limited time, it doesn't work here) they get bullied into submission,by the big hypocrites of TE, instead of being informed about the gameplay differences from the start.

    given that this agreement is unwritten, big alliances can manipulate it to suit their need whenever they want to.

     

    I'm in RE- we were giving you guys a love-tap, a slap on the wrist, a 'time out'... and you counter back saying that we can go suck it?

    Plan B- you go out and find a switch, not one too flimsy, bring it back to RE and it will be a firm-but-fair 3 lashings, if you continue to mouth off we will gradually increase the lashings until you've learned your lesson.

    We want your Alliance to grow up and be well mannered- this atlas/nightmare movement nonsense has no buisness on our precious green meadows, with sunshine and white painted fences

    and here you go, the undiplomatic bulling language, these alliances are used to.

    he could have said, "OK, if you offer NDO peace,then we offer you peace, that was the reason for us attacking you, and now problem solved", but noooo

    they also require you to talk nicely to the big rulers of TE, because you can't offend the big dictators :D

     

    Edit:spelling.

  8. That was a mis-calculation by DEFCON and RE. They wanted to drive us into submission, but they completely misunderstood the Eurasian mindset and its antecedents. The harder the going, the firmer our resolve.

    We're reasonable people, but we will not be ground into submission by a couple of hypocritical leaders. They don't like their precarious balance of power being upset, and we just happened to give them an excuse to act on it.

    You're right on this, the people defending this "unwritten"agreement, broke this same agreement at the beginning of this round, and last round too (and that is only talking from my experience), however that does not justify the attack on NDO, in TE there is no foreign aid, and limited time to rebuild, every nation is on its own, i have no experience in SE, but i can imagine with foreign aid and unlimited amount of time to rebuild, your actions could have been justified, it's a different type of game play here, this will most likely cripple nations with low warchest(especially with all the dirty spy ops)  and they won't have time to rebuild well, because the round ends in a month, for some it will be pointless to even go on.

     

    As i recall from my first round, an alliance called Atlas broke the "unwritten" agreement with a done declare on The Fearless Fighters, and a similar war broke out that lead to the fall of Atlas.

     

    I suggest that the "unwritten" agreement to be written, all or most alliances in TE, write a thread, with no more than 5 basic ground rules or less.

    Write down the things that everyone already agrees on in TE, leave out the things that people have mixed opinions on, and ask the admin to pin it.

    this is more likely to solve the problem than expecting everyone to agree to things that weren't even discussed with them.

     

    hopefully this whole conflict will get solved as soon as possible.  

  9. Well, dont put blame on me for being a poor player, there was no down declare. My suggestion is be prepared, you guys are considered a easy target, dont get surprized

    Stop Bulsh*ting cowboy, it was a scumbag move and you did it just to roll TDO, the same scumbag move you pulled on The Avengers last round and ruined the round of Nightmare Movement on the way, your people rouged blacklight, and dirty spy oped him and others in KrAbZ so don't bullsh*t me with this "poor player" crap, you are not doing this for playing, you are doing this to stop our growth, roll TDO, and pick an easy war and hide it behind numbers like D1 always do.

    it's alright we will fight you, doesn't matter if we win or lose, but you can't blame me if i treat you with your own medicine at some point in the feature.

     

     

    What I see here is D1/RE defining the rules of engagement for this round.

    1. Attack nations at 69-100 infra and outgrow them, never give them a chance to recover.

    2. Dirty spy ops are cool.

    3. Down declare/ up declare is out of consideration for this round.

    4. No unstated community rules to be followed.

    So be it.

    Just dont be hypocritic on forums and say that its friendly and clean. Its just plain war. No need to defend, actions can speak for themselves.

    Good luck to all.

    Yes all those points are right, doesn't matter how they try to spin it.

     

    I am so confused. FF and krabz are both ran by people that came from TDO last round. You are basically all the same TDO last round. So why do you keep stating they are noobs? TDO pretending they keep their hands clean just makes me laugh. Sounding pretty hypocritical up in here.

    I would assume many things confuse you Kaboom, but if a misfits member left and tried to create his own alliance or joined another doesn't make that alliance misfits, same logic applies to TDO, if you know something about logic. and KrAbZ has a lot of people who did not play before, and were not in TDO.

    but its nice that you can laugh, every post i read from you before you were either whining or crying.

  10. I would happily roll you if I wasn't so busy dealing with TDO and avengers rogue because you guys couldn't keep up with me out building all of you.

    i'm not experienced enough to judge your building skills, but you are for sure the best whiner in TE, i considered attacking you, but then i thought he will only go whine about it on the forum and ruin my fun, so i attacked someone else.

    you seem like a good fighter, but a better whiner.

  11.  

     

    Yourself and others from TDO are only trying to twist things to make me look bad for calling out all of your underhand attacks against others, Avengers do the same which is your only defense against some one who speaks out against it as I'm not the one unfairly rolling anyone or using immoral tactics. Your only defense is to make me look bad at any means possible and you'll fail just as Avengers did and those before them because you have no argument, only twisted lies that i will expose for what they are. Even now you're trying very hard to say that my call outs at the Avengers unfair tactics was nothing but hate speech. Are you playing the same game because maybe you didn't see that D1/WD's and TPC all had grudges with Avengers from these unfair tactics and they let the Avengers know this with actions of their own. 

    I'm not a representative of TDO, anything i say is my own opinion.

    I'm not trying to twist things, everything i said about you was based on things you posted. i'm not trying to make you look bad either, i'm pointing out that your posts do make you look bad to me.

    you might have good intentions i don't know, but its not coming across this way, the way you are coming across is that you have a grudge with TA and you want revenge on them, i don't know if i'm right or wrong about that, but that is how you seem when i read your post, it is just very obvious how much you hate TA.

    and i don't like how you keep throwing accusation without having proof for them, sometimes it feels like provocation.

    i don't like how you get into somethings that are obviously none of your business.

    i'm just saying, if you are against down declare, you should always be against down declares even if they happen to TA.

    and i don't understand why you're trying to make a simulation of politics and war fair, it is not happening in RL i don't see it happening in this game, online gaming is rarely fair, believe me, i played so many online games, i can't think of one that was fair, you are just setting yourself up for disappointment if you are expecting it to work out this way, statistics, math, and  psychology experiments will prove that to you.

    I think we all should learn from what RE/NM trying to do now, holding grudges against one another will just make this game less fun each round, if the nations are deleted so should the grudges be.

     

    and seriously now, this is my last post talking about CN with you, and i wrote it just to clarify things that you seem to misunderstand.

    edit: took spelling and gramatical mistakes out :facepalm: the ones i noticed at least.

     

    I thought you said you hadn't yet read all the books?

     

    But everyone to their own, even if their favorite king was a fool i guess.  :P The Battle of the Bells i wouldn't say was one of his best victories as he hid away until the Starks and Tully's arrived. The Battle of Summerhall where he defeated three armies in one day is where he showed his impressive ability to win battles. Robert was a good man, a great commander but a poor King.

     

    I never said Rhaegar never took up arms because of the rebellion, i said he first took up arms because he thought he was suppose to fulfill the "prince that was promised" prophecy.

     

    As a child he read obsessively, to the point that jests were made about his habits. He became a noted warrior later in life, although he did not initially seem inclined to martial habits. However, apparently by something he had read, Rhaegar became motivated to become a warrior.According to a tale told of Rhaegar, one day he found something in his scrolls that changed him and he decided to become a knight. He said to Ser Willem Darry, the master-at-arms,

    “ I will require a sword and armor. It seems I must be a warrior. ”

     

    Of course its only theory but its very likely this is why he took up the sword, he was years ahead of his time and he did it to prepare and defend the Seven Kingdoms.

     

     

    ASOIAF is ultimately a war of the gods, so I'd never count the old or the new gods out. These gods have their champions too if you know where to look.

    i finished the 5th book about 2 weeks ago and almost cried.

    i was thinking of the Battle of summerhalls when i talked about the battles of the bells thanks for correcting me, but i call roberts hiding good strategy and what ser williem darry have done bad strategy, he should have done what Tywin lannister would have done.

    " I'm not trying to honor you. I'm trying to get you to run my kingdom while I can eat, drink and whore my way to an early grave"  that is why he is my favorite, he is a hilarious king, unlike this stannis :D

    i misunderstood you about Rhaegar, thanks for the clarification, i know what you mean now, and i agree of course.

  12. We informed you of the raids in the first place. You guys couldn't be bothered until it affected your leadership directly. Lame.

    again, i wrote you before you attacked Top Gear, and promised to do my best and write the government members asking about that and solving it. so you got our attention before raiding the government. but it is your attack on top gear that seemed to have trigger all these counter attacks.

    i tried to look at my sen't messages to make sure that i was clear about how long it would take and that you shouldn't attack more nations for the rest of the day, but they seem to have been deleted for some weird reason, so if i haven't been clear about that i really apologize for it, it is me to blame for the whole misunderstanding then.

  13. Before making anymore of these uninformed judgments about characters, you should first do your home work. Either read the books or use the following resources:

     

    This here explains the Targaryen madness: http://awoiaf.westeros.org/index.php/Targaryen_madness

     

    Here are some quotes about Danny from the books. Not a single character ever compares here to the Mad King, in fact, shes only been compared to the greatest Targaryen to have ever lived, IMO the 2nd greatest too, Rheagar  .

     

    Quotes about Daenerys “ Ser Jorah: You are your brother's sister, in truth.

    Daenerys: Viserys?

    Ser Jorah: No. Rhaegar. [41]

    Jorah Mormont to Daenerys

     

    “ The frightened child who sheltered in my manse died on the Dothraki Sea, and was reborn in blood and fire. This dragon queen who wears her name is a true Targaryen. [42]

    Illyrio Mopatis

     

    “ The Blood of Aegon the Dragon flows in her veins. [42]

    Illyrio Mopatis

     

    Daenerys Targaryen is no maid, however. She is the widow of a Dothraki khal, a mother of dragons and a sacker of cities, Aegon the Conqueror with teats. . .[43]

    Tyrion Lannister

     

    And i know you will but lets not brag too much about Robert slaying Rhaegar, Robert was a fool and he died like a fool, he will be remembered as such and his dynasty will only survive if Stannis or Shireen take back the Iron Throne. Rhaegar only took up the sword because he believed he was to fulfill "the prince that was promised" prophecy.

    Well, i read the books, i'm a big fan of the real Daenarys but you have to admit that she is naive.

    I make this jokes because you'r behavior on the forums reminds me more of Viserys in the Dothraki Sea than it ever reminded me of Dany.

    Sure, you might be trying to make this game fair and moral (like Dany ), but judging only from the posts i read from you since half of last round till now you strike me more as a troll and a hater (like Viserys).

    You encourage hate against those who disagree with you or speak up against you(like you accusing me of being a bully, among other things), it was TA last round, and now you seem to have moved on to TDO. 

    you might be right about TA you might also be wrong, as a new player i don't care what happened between you two before, i'd like to judge them for my self, which is why i never liked all the hate speech you kept writing about them all the time, i won't take your word for it that they are bad, and if they were bad before it doesn't really interest me as much as what they are now.

     

    You are right about Robert though, he was a fool, my favorite king, but still a fool, although the realm was at peace for 17 years when he ruled, but no thanks to him really, and you know why.

    you can't deny that the battle of the trident is something to brag about, also the battle of the bells, Robert was a great warrior, but as Renly once said "Great warriors don't make great kings".

    i can't discuss stannis without spoiling things to people, and i really don't want to do that.

    i disagree about Rhaegar though, he took up arms because of the rebellion and the same reason Robert took up arms "Lyanna stark". the prophecy is very arguable and everyone can interpret it differently and the red priests aren't always right, and take the old gods into consideration when you think about that(also Griff).

    please consider not accidentally spoiling things for people when you write about GoT here., and i hope i did not do that either.

     

    ps: i shouldn't even be doing this really, i'm done arguing with the misfits for a while now, i've tried logic it didn't work, you threw empty accusations with nothing to support it back at me , i replied with complete honesty(more than i should have really), i got mockery and more accusation from you guys, so please understand when i say i don't want to discuss CN with you people for a while now.

  14. No doubt.

    Don't listen to the blood of the mad king man.

    you can judge from my messages how big of a "bully" i am, and she knows nothing about me, not enough to make a judgment anyway.

    i am still hopping to solve this peacefully, as it is ridicules to create unnecessary hostilities between us.

  15. I only attacked them after your Alliance magr decided to respond with a lecture on how the game was "played". I responded and waited for a response back for an hour. I just happened to notice a Govt official was available for attack and I needed to troop dump instead to prepare for further attacks. Which did happen. I would have been cool with your response. Maybe you should be in Govt instead of the fools that are now?

    lets stay away from insults please.

    my understanding after your last response that you will not attack another nation of TDO for the rest of the day, and i expected that because people live in different time zones and sometimes it takes hours for them to respond to messages. i thought a day is a reasonable amount of time for the problem to be resolved. 

  16. So I just sit around and wait for dude's next attack while you guys resolve the issue? Sounds legit.

    Dude, i contacted you and asked you politely to stop attacking us and i promised to ask what was going on and solve this peacefully, you wrote me back that you want no hostility between our two alliance, then you went ahead and attacked Top Gear after that. 

    you have already gotten our attention from your first attack, then while me and you were talking you attacked a second nation, i still asked you politely to stop it.

    i don't understand what were you hopping to achieve from doing a third attack.

×
×
  • Create New...