Jump to content

Malkavian

Members
  • Posts

    674
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Malkavian

  1. I just realized this now. I said they did not send enough. You assumed there were none. Do you normally mangle what people say?

     

    You barely registered that little fact? Shame on you, Mr. Gross. 

     

    The dilemma I duly noted was an approach at narrative perspective. I did not manipulate your [intended] point, but mounted an opposing point of view. The subject (noun) of your fragment sentence was the issue of courtesans being exchanged in the diplomatic process. No clause has ever been written to include the trade of women for a treaty nor where terms adjusted in your original treaty to warrant the conclusion. 

     

    A perspective is a point of view that differentiates by (literal) interpretation of the point made. You confounded that the treaty was cancelled due to failure to satisfy the prerequisite that ladies be gifted to continue the peace, yes?  Why would that be included if you already had women in your alliance? Why stress that point beyond other pressing matters in cancellation? Where is the clause in your treaty that mandates this? 

     

    I had another point of view, Mr. Gross. I am terribly sorry I got you knickers in-a-bunch. 

×
×
  • Create New...