Jump to content

Vladimir Stukov II

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,663

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Vladimir Stukov II

  14. Declaration of War from the Viridian Entente

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    5 months of peace mode is very extreme and you know it. It sets a terribly bad precedent that you can basically ban nations from doing anything meaningful for that entire period of time. This is especially worrisome for alliances like mine who are much more community driven than militarily driven, and not all of our nations are going to fight in a given war. Just because we decide to rule our nations one way does not mean you get to enact any term you like because of that. 
     
    Besides that, find me a time GATO has ever asked for or enforced harsh/punitive terms in wars we have won (besides NPO's GW1 surrender if you want to include it.) I think we opened with 10k to TSO when we fought them, but our GA got so angry with our government for starting with that offer that is was quickly rescinded. NPO has lost something like 60% of its NS and the majority of its upper tier nations which I think should be more than enough to satisfy everyone without ridiculous stipulations being demanded for peace. So yes, I think the terms are ridiculous, as do my alliance, allies, and parts of your coalition do as well. 
     
    You are a smarter ruler than that WC, one who I respect greatly even if we do not see eye to eye often, please don't purposely be so obtuse.

    5 months of peace mode is so extreme for nations who have voluntarily been in peace mode for 3 months...

  16. Declaration of War from the Viridian Entente

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    I guess that's fair but if they fought harder I'd seriously consider it as an end in your shoes.

    Again, I'll propose it to you (and I know the answer I believe): What terms would you accept in Pacifica's shoes?

     

    I would accept the terms they were offered. If we kept our upper tier in peace mode the whole war it's not a big hit to have them stay in peace mode for a few months more. They still come out without taking any damage.

  24. The results are... on to step 2.

    in Open World RP

    Posted

    I realize your own massive arrogance says to you that "my own opinions is clearly more right than someone else's." That being said, I 100% follow my own advice. I weigh the totality of the alliance impact on HOW the game evolved. It is, in my estimation, the truth that the game impacted LUE and GOONS far more than LUE and GOONS impacted the game. When faced with adversity, they took their ball and went home. Unlike, say MK at the top... when they faced adversity the took over the game. Now you are free to make the argument that those in MK got to where they were because of what they learned in LUE, and you are certainly free to make that argument, and I will not come here and call out your opinion, as I have no need to try to break down, or lessen the meaning of someone else's opinion. It is called humility. You could use some, and accept that not everyone sees things as you do.


    Right, keep telling yourself that Athens impacted the game more than LUE or GOONS. Athens was never anything more than a second rate alliance. Not trying to talk shit, just being honest. For the record, I was never in any of those alliances and have no reason to promote them. I was in BoSS and GOLD but I'm not delusional enough to pretend they had as major of an impact on the game as you are with Athens. I just see how ridiculous it is that you plead for people to vote based on political impact in the game instead of how much they liked an alliance and then proceed to vote your largely irrelevant alliance second.
×
×
  • Create New...