-
Posts
1,663 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Vladimir Stukov II
-
-
1 NPO
2 MK
3 NpO
4 TOP
5 LUE
Don't know why so many people put DBDC in their top 5 when they didn't even exist when more than a handful of people paid attention to CN politics. -
Can we at least keep it going til I hit top 10 in casualties?
-
How would Santa deliver his Christmas nukes if there was a truce? The best CN gift is more casualties!
-
He can always choose not to nuke you just to deny you casualties ;)
Hmm interesting strategy... :awesome:
-
I want a present.
-
I guess Vlad missed the memo. :(
I'm in my element!
-
I really have no strong feelings on either alliance. However, the feelings I do have are mostly negative. I can only say that my feelings about this front are similar to my feelings on the MI6/VE front. I hope you both destroy each other.
I thought you liked us. :(
-
Johan Vult!
-
Congratulations! I see much success for you guys in the future.
-
Great to see. I gained a lot of respect for Sparta after their performance in the last war.
-
Rey, you are just as obnoxious as Tywin, fyi.
-
Everyone knows Pacifican banks use their slots to import tech. How cruel of you all to punish the innocent Pacifican bankers!
-
5 months of peace mode is so extreme for nations who have voluntarily been in peace mode for 3 months...5 months of peace mode is very extreme and you know it. It sets a terribly bad precedent that you can basically ban nations from doing anything meaningful for that entire period of time. This is especially worrisome for alliances like mine who are much more community driven than militarily driven, and not all of our nations are going to fight in a given war. Just because we decide to rule our nations one way does not mean you get to enact any term you like because of that.
Besides that, find me a time GATO has ever asked for or enforced harsh/punitive terms in wars we have won (besides NPO's GW1 surrender if you want to include it.) I think we opened with 10k to TSO when we fought them, but our GA got so angry with our government for starting with that offer that is was quickly rescinded. NPO has lost something like 60% of its NS and the majority of its upper tier nations which I think should be more than enough to satisfy everyone without ridiculous stipulations being demanded for peace. So yes, I think the terms are ridiculous, as do my alliance, allies, and parts of your coalition do as well.
You are a smarter ruler than that WC, one who I respect greatly even if we do not see eye to eye often, please don't purposely be so obtuse. -
This is a world where alliances have paid hundreds of thousands of tech in reps but suddenly requiring nations that have been avoiding damage by staying in peace mode to remain in peace mode for a period after the war is some outrageous and insulting offer that no alliace would ever agree to? Give me an effing break.
-
I guess that's fair but if they fought harder I'd seriously consider it as an end in your shoes.
Again, I'll propose it to you (and I know the answer I believe): What terms would you accept in Pacifica's shoes?I would accept the terms they were offered. If we kept our upper tier in peace mode the whole war it's not a big hit to have them stay in peace mode for a few months more. They still come out without taking any damage.
-
You know as well as I do that you have the upper hand and if you make a reasonable offer it's very possible to coax them out.
A reasonable offer was made but NPO is refusing everything except white peace.
-
TOP has a smaller amount of nations. Some of those 100k NS nations will be told to fight before this is done I'm sure.It doesn't matter that we have a smaller amount of nations, we still have the largest upper tier in this war outside of Umbrella and IRON. Why would those nations be told to fight if they haven't fought yet and NPO is looking for a peace deal?
-
Define "intact"
NPO has 6 more 100k ns nations than even TOP does. I'd say that's a pretty sizable upper tier.
-
The crux of all this mess is the unreasonable demands being made of NPO, not some stupid concept of blind loyalty to a coalition.
Unreasonable? It's unreasonable to expect to lose a war with your upper tier still intact. -
-
I'm gonna have to disband you guys this time.
-
Neutrals are taking all the sanction spots!
-
I realize your own massive arrogance says to you that "my own opinions is clearly more right than someone else's." That being said, I 100% follow my own advice. I weigh the totality of the alliance impact on HOW the game evolved. It is, in my estimation, the truth that the game impacted LUE and GOONS far more than LUE and GOONS impacted the game. When faced with adversity, they took their ball and went home. Unlike, say MK at the top... when they faced adversity the took over the game. Now you are free to make the argument that those in MK got to where they were because of what they learned in LUE, and you are certainly free to make that argument, and I will not come here and call out your opinion, as I have no need to try to break down, or lessen the meaning of someone else's opinion. It is called humility. You could use some, and accept that not everyone sees things as you do.
Right, keep telling yourself that Athens impacted the game more than LUE or GOONS. Athens was never anything more than a second rate alliance. Not trying to talk shit, just being honest. For the record, I was never in any of those alliances and have no reason to promote them. I was in BoSS and GOLD but I'm not delusional enough to pretend they had as major of an impact on the game as you are with Athens. I just see how ridiculous it is that you plead for people to vote based on political impact in the game instead of how much they liked an alliance and then proceed to vote your largely irrelevant alliance second. -
I ask that you all consider political impact on the game, and give very little meaning to "they had a bunch of cool people!"
2) Athens
.
.
.
.
.
8) GOONS
9) LUE
Do you not listen to your own advice?
Panning for Old GOLD
in Open World RP
Posted
Hey W_A_R, did you forget to go back even further to our BoSS days? That was about 10 years ago now. I was 14 back then, started playing the summer before high school. What a great way to spend a good amount of my youth...