Jump to content

Willaim Kreiger

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,131

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Willaim Kreiger

  3. Really, Methrage?

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='NOMNOMNOMNOMNOM' timestamp='1300000444' post='2662629']
    crying
    [/quote]

    And I quote from your nation bio:
    [quote]Hello. MXCA, TCU, and UINE, CoJ, Kerberos Nexus, 64 Digits, and the NeoLegion will be terminated. 1 surrender, [b]2 deletions from the game caused[/b]. 12 Nukes NOM'd! [/quote]

    How does it feel to be on the other end of those nukes buddy?

  5. Announcement from Poison Clan and Ragnarok

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='crazymatty' timestamp='1300072492' post='2664006']
    This Victory is for Derwood1;
    Don Fernando;
    Citizenkane;
    Twisted;
    Mushi;
    Jgator;
    Banslam;
    Venhith;
    Shiftee Foxxe;
    The King of Town;
    Ainata;

    Gone before their time. Gone before they were ready.
    [/quote]
    I warred two of those fine gentlemen, and they were class acts, even if they did pile on someone who was smaller than them. RIP, and congrats on peace.

  11. A GOONS Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Johnny Apocalypse' timestamp='1299195305' post='2651622']
    How old are you guys exactly? Honestly this place feels more and more like a playground with every post, so I will be the first to admit, yes i mad. Your posting is pissing me off because you're killing any chance we had left for intelligent discourse by contributing to the infinite ocean of "U MAD LOL" posts and don't get me started on the "Your tears are delicious" posts(yeah I know, that's mainly us)

    Most of you are better than this; !@#$@#$ act like it.


    Nonetheless, congrats on the government switcheroo GOONS.
    [/quote]
    Did you happen to consider whether English is even their first language? Good luck with your new Co-Pilot, guys.

  14. Cruise Missile Error?

    in Report A Bug

    Posted

    So I'm not sure if this is actually a bug or not, but this has literally never happened to me before in 4+ years in the game.

    Cruise Missile #1
    [quote]To: rulername From: Willaim Kreiger Date: 2/28/2011 12:11:20 AM

    Subject: Cruise Missile Attack
    Message: Your nation has been attacked with a cruise missile by Willaim Kreiger. You lost 0 defending tanks, 2.84 technology, and 0.28 infrastructure. Any existing peace offers that were on the table have been automatically canceled.[/quote]

    Cruise Missile #2
    [quote]To: rulername From: Willaim Kreiger Date: 2/28/2011 12:11:40 AM

    Subject: Cruise Missile Attack
    Message: Your nation has been attacked with a cruise missile by Willaim Kreiger. You lost 7 defending tanks, 2.84 technology, and 14.18 infrastructure. Any existing peace offers that were on the table have been automatically canceled.
    [/quote]

    I always thought that cruise missile damages were based on total amount of infra/tech/etc and then the improvements helped that out. I'm a little confused about the .28 infra damage in the first one and the 14.18 damage in the second. If this isn't a bug then just ignore this, but I talked to some people and they'd never heard of it either so I figured I'd post it up here. I should mention that he didn't buy a bunch of infrastructure or something before the 2nd CM, I checked and the levels were the same.

    Anyway, thanks!

  16. A Dark Templar Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='XRCatD' timestamp='1298848514' post='2646393']
    IMO this whole thing is not because of CSN having greed... it's fear tactics. If they can successfully extort a lot of reps in this war, then in future wars people on the opposite side to CSN will be more likely to opt not to declare CSN or its allies...due to potential fear of potential reps just like these.

    So successful reps benefit CSN + its allies quite a lot...
    [/quote]
    Or, alternatively, alliance X declares on CSN and "burns them into the ground". They then justify massive reparations based on CSN's support of massive reps in the recent past and CSN and their allies suffer. Regardless good luck out there DT.

  18. Disease of the elderly threatens thousands

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Teddyyo' timestamp='1298526369' post='2643590']
    "Yeah! If you were in our situation, you wouldn't be so happy!"

    I agree. The difference is, we aren't, and you are.

    I also loved the first bit. Saying that to VE, of all alliances. Lol.
    [/quote]
    The alliance that, at the first sign of getting rolled, decided to pack its' bags and disband? Truly, a force to behold.

    And you are quite correct, good sir. We are in this situation, and we are making the best of it. You seem to be caught up on "military prowess" as if an alliance that is hopelessly outgunned should be able to systematically destroy the offending alliances that have breached her sovereignty. News flash: this world isn't built that way. I was simply stating my desire to see you in our shoes, and to observe how your alliance would react to a what can really be described as a curb stomp. I venture to guess that your military prowess, member retention, and overall "performance" would be overall worse than ours. Purely my opinion though!

    But as you state, you havn't found yourselves in that position yet. Someday though, you will.

    Anyway, we are venturing far off the topic at hand. It's update, enjoy your wars gentlemen.

  19. Disease of the elderly threatens thousands

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Teddyyo' timestamp='1298525858' post='2643579']
    [b][i]Nation Count![/b][/i]

    The new standard for measuring war performance.
    [/quote]
    I value community and commitment over "performance" any day. It is the most important thing when you are far outnumbered and outgunned by your enemies. It is also indicative of how well us and our friends are doing against some of your nations, as they are fighting a conflict where it's not difficult for them to hit peace mode, and yet they choose to abandon the AA, or even quit the game instead.

    But hey, comfort yourselves however you like. I would [b]relish[/b] the opportunity to see your "military performance" in a similar situation to our own. I think the statistics that you seem to be so fond of would be very interesting indeed.

  20. Disease of the elderly threatens thousands

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Willaim Kreiger

    [quote name='Teddyyo' timestamp='1298525217' post='2643565']
    Plan B:

    Look at facts.
    Realize facts aren't on your side.
    Throw out large numbers, smoke, and mirrors.
    ...
    Profit!
    [/quote]
    Okay, I'll bite Teddyyo. Since the war started:

    NpO: 368 (+5)
    VE: 293 (-31)

    How on earth do you lose 31 nations in a war where you own a distinct numerical advantage, as you like to point out wherever you can? No smoke and mirrors on that one, friend.

  22. War Propaganda

    in Open World RP

    Posted

    [quote name='kriekfreak' timestamp='1298487092' post='2642991']
    Hahaha that is the best one till now. Not because I agree with it but because it's so ridiculously funny.
    [/quote]
    I'd have to agree with this man. So. Awesome.

  24. A Dark Templar Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by Willaim Kreiger

    [quote name='Jocabia' timestamp='1298354585' post='2641475']
    No, I implied that being defeated is synonymous with defeat. And you are being defeated. Soundly.

    And you're correct, some great alliances have managed to refuse terms and have survived. One of two things happened. Either they were defeated but not destroyed. Or they had a better FA than DT. DT will exist after this war. Frankly, I like most of them I've talked to, even some that are in this thread. I've found almost everyone I've warred with to be reasonable. A couple were pretty pissed at the dismantling of their nation but out of all of them, only one was anything less than cordial. I don't want DT to be destroyed. Unlike some among DT, we've not made a concerted effort to dismantle their AA. It's not even a choice being bandied about. We want their community to survive. But they will not be able to make war in any real sense for a very long time. And that sits well with us.
    [/quote]
    Oh I don't know, we've lost 70% of our total NS pre-war but that isn't really that hard to get back. We've done it before and we'll do it again. VE has managed to somehow lose almost 10% of their nations while fighting a massively lopsided war against us and STA for the most part, so being defeated soundly seems a [i]bit[/i] over the top. Especially considering we're +3 on nation count from where we started in this mess. We are without a doubt losing, though we'll drag VE down with us if they're not careful.

    As to your second paragraph, your vast generalizations warping an entire array of options down to either, or choices is funny. My initial point still stands, whether you like it or not, DT will always have a choice besides accepting your absurd reparations, or rejecting them and "burning". Even if you guys don't lose interest in chasing down every last DT nation another war will come along to distract your attention. I would wager that you guys lose interest in "burning" DT far before it ever legitimately happens. But I suppose if DT remains resolute in their decision we shall see, won't we?

  25. A Dark Templar Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    [quote name='Jocabia' timestamp='1298353247' post='2641447']
    They can reject the terms as they like. That doesn't represent another choice. It's one of the choices I gave you. And we can choose to fight until they accept our terms. And we have. Very simple.

    I'm not bent out of shape. I'm just explaining where things are at. In public. See, we're not surrendering in public and claiming we're winning in private. I know we're winning. They know we're winning. And they're trying to convince their membership this isn't the case, because they're afraid their membership won't be too happy about sacrificing their nations to pride.
    [/quote]
    You implied not accepting terms is synonymous with defeat. It is not unless you wish it to be. There are some great alliances, well respected throughout this game, that were not offered or refused terms and had their community survive. Just because your frame of mind is too small to comprehend life without infrastructure doesn't necessitate that everyone else plays by the same rules.

    There's something to be said for keeping your pride in yourselves and those around you. Perhaps if you ever find yourself under the knife, you will understand. Perhaps not.

×
×
  • Create New...