bobo t baggins

[quote name='Veneke' timestamp='1296939009' post='2620916'] You're just jealous you haven't ZI'd anyone yet. Don't worry though, your secret is safe with me. [/quote] completely missing the point guy completely misses the point. it herps. then it derps. my war screen... is full of win.

[quote name='Veneke' timestamp='1296900248' post='2620347'] So, your argument is that the 57th took advantage of the poor strategic situation PANADOL put himself in and subsequently ZI'd him? Call me crazy, but I'm still chalking that up as a win for our side. [/quote] and that is fine if youre that pathetic a group. whats funny about it is running around patting yourselves on the backs about it like its an accomplishment and then trying to defend it like theres a point in doing so aside from utterly embarrassing yourselves in public. if that was your goal, then double win for you.

[quote name='Mitch12120' timestamp='1296890758' post='2620229'] http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display_charts.asp?Nation_ID=440666 Those 3 evidently didn't do much. EDIT: Had same idea as Ven. [/quote] yes. you had the same idea to deflect from the point. come on kids, you guys dont even know how the war screen works. those little dates are when the war was DECLARED, not when it ended. and the charts screen does not account for what was lost and replaced, thus the draining of the economy of the nation you are looking at, which is what actually makes a difference in war, which was done before you declared, is not shown.

oh and good job taking all the credit for what is taking... what, athens guys... how many alliances are warring with you right now? 4? 5? but its all this little flash in the pan right here thats responsible for anything that happens.

[quote name='evilsquirrel' timestamp='1296890517' post='2620224'] To be honest we didnt look at his expired wars. We simply looked for nations in our range. He was within range so we attacked. What is it with you and puppies anyway? [/quote] what is it with [i]you[/i] and puppies? youre the one kicking them and bragging about it.

[quote name='evilsquirrel' timestamp='1296890258' post='2620216'] His other three wars expired a week before we even touched him so go troll somewhere else [/quote] no they did not. learn to read the war screen.

[quote name='evilsquirrel' timestamp='1296890258' post='2620216'] 5 of us. I only know of the two on our end. His infra never went down when we weren't attacking him.....wait why am I explaining this to you? The bar as we all know is that a ZI is a ZI is a ZI. [/quote] no, not really. so what youre saying is that you two jumped on this guy at the very end of a 3 front war he was fighting and you think that somehow you were the ones who got the job done? i had assumed you were a part of the war they were already fighting... thats usually how it works. "hey look, a bleeding puppy!" "lets kick it til it dies" "YEAH WE'RE KILLERS!"

see now upon looking at panadol's war screen it appears it took at least 5 of you and 15 days or longer to get that guy to ZI seriously not something to brag about.

[quote name='Malkavias' timestamp='1296889290' post='2620191'] 4 on 1? It could happen. [/quote] lets do the math here... what is the difference in difficulty here? MASSIVE. you know it. i know it. we all know it. taking 420 infra off someone isnt exactly an accomplishment. thats 2 nations over 5 days hitting one nations that likely didnt even fight back.

[quote name='Mitch12120' timestamp='1296889156' post='2620189'] One on one? Without nukes? [/quote] obviously your sarcasm detection skills need honing.

[quote name='Mitch12120' timestamp='1296888828' post='2620184'] People seem to not realize that a vast majority of our nations aren't 30 days old either. So it is the same as a say a 10000 infra nation ZIing another 10000 infra nation. In about a week. [/quote] yeah that happens all the time, putting a huge nation to ZI in a week. totally possible.

[quote name='evilsquirrel' timestamp='1296888050' post='2620162'] Well he had about 420 infra and about 100 tech or so. Had to be close enough to me for me to attack. [/quote] 420 INFRA!!?why so much!?

[quote name='evilsquirrel' timestamp='1296887512' post='2620147'] Considering how big the nation was at the beginning I'd say he was more than a puppy but meh. Maybe the momma dog shouldn't have sent out her puppies to get kicked? [/quote] couldn't have been very much bigger than he is not at 20 days old. whats your next trick gonna be, filming yourself and two friends shoving elementary school kids into mud puddles?

the other day vice president killface and i were wandering about kicking puppies and congratulating each other on how tough the other looked with boot to puppy stomach. it was super awesome.

[quote name='D34th' timestamp='1296883141' post='2619912'] All you said is true, however, that doesn't represent MK's posts. All that the majority of members of MK knows is post memes, attacks and complain about something that they usually do but don't like when people do the same thing with them. There are ways and ways to argue about something, and MK arguments are based in hypocrisy and whining. I'd advice you to take a look at posts made by MK member and only then come back here to preach about civil debate ok? [/quote] that was absolutely a great story. and your listing of definitions like that was super as well [quote name=dictionary] noun n. ( Abbr. n. ) The part of speech that is used to name a person, place, thing, quality, or action and can function as the subject or object of.[/quote] [quote name=dictionary] verb n. ( Abbr. V or vb. ) The part of speech that expresses existence, action, or occurrence in most languages. [/quote]

[quote name='KainIIIC' timestamp='1296872598' post='2619742'] Typically, a lot of people will point out that "MK are hypocrites" when MK more or less acts like blatant hypocrites. [/quote] would it be possible for you to prove this is not essentially ad-hominem nonsense? [quote name='KainIIIC' timestamp='1296872598' post='2619742'] That's just reaping what you've sewn. [/quote] like pockets? i really hate reaping mended pockets.

personally i think MK is [i]the[/i] alliance to beat here on bob. umad? =)

[quote name='mindbullet' timestamp='1296801423' post='2619029'] Over 50 Wars *round of shots* here's to the next! o/ FHU [/quote] so long and thanks for all the tech

that reminds me.. who's flying hellfish united?

[quote name='The Catalyst' timestamp='1296768340' post='2618169'] then why do you big nations fund our wars! we sub 10k nations secretly run things tbh.. Disclamer: (we dont really) [/quote] [img]http://s3.amazonaws.com/mocospace-pic/20716/20716/orig/photoalbum_207154179_user36457448-1.jpg[/img] you say funny thing

[quote name='The Catalyst' timestamp='1296767599' post='2618126'] HEY Us sub 10K Nations have feelings too! [/quote] lies!

[quote name='Dethkon1' timestamp='1296710565' post='2617157'] Some may laugh at our small alliance stepping into the fray with bigger alliances that outnumber us in terms of strength and numbers. [/quote] QFT

gots me some gold and wheat...anyone? ...anyone? frisky dingo