bobo t baggins

[quote name='Dochartaigh' timestamp='1298864505' post='2646561'] i read what he wrote and the way he wrote it made it sound like DT walked out of negotiations which never happened. We counter-offered which is completely different from "walking away". So even figuratively he is lying since DT counter-offered terms but never walked away from a term. not to mention, you defined the term "walk(ed) away" and then redefine it in the same post. according to your definition walk away means to abandon the problem (which DT never did), survive with minimal injury (this has yet to be determined), or to leave a situation, place, or person (which DT never did). wait, your definition sounds exactly like me stating that DT never walked out of negotiations.... wow. and you are trying to lecture me on what a definition is... then, as i stated before, you redefine it to mean that DT interjected... wait, if we left the situation, how did we interject anything? seriously dude, don't lecture me on something you clearly know nothing about and are just pulling crap out your ass and flinging it around like a monkey. so please, learn some reading comprehension before you attempt to lecture me on something. [/quote] coming back with a counter offer is not walking away, that is true. however, refusing to live up to that offer certainly is. you were trying to call someone a liar that was not lying by attempting to bend his words to your own personal needs. just as you have tried to bend my own to them in your asinine response here. you are certainly trying to hit the revisionist wagon early. [quote name='Ashoka the Great' timestamp='1298968260' post='2647880'] Then it will be another 80 pages of you making an ass of yourself. Again. [/quote] do you work in the department of redundancy department?

[quote name='Dochartaigh' timestamp='1298841270' post='2646291'] everything. DT was the one who offered the terms, not CSN. CSN then refused the terms only to go back 30 hours later to accept. By that time, due to the refusal and no word sent to DT that CSN was discussing said terms, the terms were off the table. At this point, DT offered white peace and an apology, CSN refused the apology which was promptly taken off the table, then walked out. Then we get to Goose's blog. so, basically everything that Penk had said was a lie or complete distortion. at no point did DT walk out. in fact, DT has not walked out of a single negotiation, whereas CSN has walked out of several. [/quote] actually we offered terms first (remember the 40k tech so many of you fellows are constantly complaining about?), as is the progression one expects when someone surrenders. the person who is surrendering is given the terms upon which they can do so by the person(s) they are surrendering to, not the other way around. (think "say uncle" like your cousin used to make you do to get him to stop torquing your arm out of socket behind your back) and he did not say DT walked out, but that they walked away from the offer. which they did, figuratively. almost everything anyone says in a figurative way can be called a lie if you are going to be pedantic about literal definitions. but if you are going to do so, at least have the sense to accuse them of saying the words they actually said. allow me to assist you in learning the definition of the term "walk(ed) away"; "abandon problem"; "to survive with minimal injury"; "to leave a [b]situation[/b], place or person". in the figurative sense, "walk away" here would mean they chose interjection. and then chose a second interjection that drove a wedge into the entire process by offering terms and refusing to allow anyone time to consider them in private. this is not the way negotiations should be carried on. lets think before we do next time.

[quote name='mmansfield68' timestamp='1298778990' post='2645821'] That's not a fact. You're such a damned nuisance, and not productive to anything. You keep spouting the same memes add nauseum. Why are you here, Penkala? You talk too much - WAY too much for a non-involved party. Go hump somebody else's leg. [/quote] calm down there, captain grumpypants. oh, and what about that statement is not a fact?

[quote name='shahenshah' timestamp='1298545399' post='2643749'] Do you see what I did there? [/quote] yes, you pointlessly bolded text to try and revisit my own point upon me. tell me, when is the last time CSN complained about reps and tried to fight a war on OWF? [b]obviously[/b] it must happen all the time. otherwise there would be [b] absolutely[/b] no point in what you just did. ...oh, wait...

[quote name='Shrooms' timestamp='1298528174' post='2643622'] Wish valhalla and by proxy duckroll would make an annoucement explicitly stating there total reluctance to enter the war but if DT doesnt recieve white peace within a reasonable timeframe the cavalry will arrive might give CSN a good kick of reality straight to the nuts. /personal opinion [/quote] yes, because it makes perfect sense for x-hegemony alliances to force some unwritten more about reps onto anyone. sensible argument if i ever saw one. not that it would come as any kind of shock considering the current hypocritical state of most of those alliances, but still.

[quote name='Charles the Great' timestamp='1298488804' post='2643013'] one word....... Balderdash [/quote] Another word: "dictionary" Yet another: "grammar" [quote name='hizzy' timestamp='1298460494' post='2642769'] She just can't be trusted with anything sharper than play d'oh scissors on a good day. [/quote] Who can!?

[quote name='ace072199' timestamp='1298332892' post='2641088'] I was thinking [/quote] i do not believe you

[quote name='Gibsonator21' timestamp='1298195128' post='2639350'] I'm sure she was promoted to prove something to the OWF, right? Right? [/quote] you dont remember when we had that psychic in to tell us who should be in gov't poised to be promoted to a higher position months and months before this war so we could show what cool non-conformists we are to OWF when the pathetic campaign to try and elicit our surrender through negative publicity began? that lady sure did have her crystal ball polished up just right that day!

[quote name='Kubla Khan' timestamp='1298177550' post='2639100'] Not mad, more depressed at the implosion of an alliance I once had at least a small amount of respect for. Alas, those days are gone. I hope to one day look over the smoldering pile of rubble that was your alliance and help the survivors find homes, and possibly even some self respect, in another alliance. Good Speed CSN, may you reach rock bottom and your breaking point swiftly. [/quote] i know that i, for one, am utterly devastated that you are disappointed in us. it makes me so... so... so intensely...terribly...uncomfortable with how much i laugh every time someone of no consequence states the loss of the "small amount of respect" they once had for our alliance. seriously you guys should come up with a new line. doesnt sound like we lost much, so why would anyone care? have a happy day! <3!

o/ Liz o/ Goose o/ that Xiph guy i'd never heard of until two weeks ago who is pulling our strings in overt secrecy. he's one helluva phantom leader.

[quote name='Lord Panda' timestamp='1297021398' post='2622478'] Trolls trolling trolls. Honestly, we don't care what you say. Everyone is having fun in this war, getting our butts kicked or not. We're not crying, not complaining,and we certainly don't need your pity or your tissues. We're makin' waves, my man. Make sure you don't get swept away. [/quote] yeah. waves in a puddle. oh, and perhaps you should follow the conversation a bit better? re: the tissue comment was CLEARLY directed elsewhere, thus the quote above it. is it your first day on the internets?

[quote name='Roosterton' timestamp='1296971059' post='2621528'] I just love how so many people hate us within 30 days of our reformation. It's pretty cute to be honest. Bobo; I'm sorry. Did you even exist during the GLOF war? I don't seem to have any recollection of how you were involved, and what gives you the right to post a generic meme about tears. Or is your post of tears really stealth-tears of your own, because you're pissed off at the fact that a 13 man AA on the other side of the war is actually enjoying themselves? If this is indeed the case; Lolnoob, your tears fuel my ship, etc etc. [/quote] i offered tissue. when people cry, i do that. cause im super friendly and stuff. as for that oh, so amusing bit at the top there... about so many people hating you and such... you 57th guys sure do mistake people making fun of you and laughing at your expense for hate an awful lot.

now [i]this[/i] is a declaration or war. good luck to you. ...god knows youre going to need it.

[quote name='Wishywashy' timestamp='1296969966' post='2621410'] [b]Though we have tried to tolerate their feinting swipes, we will brook no further aggression and will immediately begin to defend ourselves.[/b] BAM! [/quote] this: "we will brook no further aggression and will immediately begin to defend ourselves." is [i]not[/i] a definitive statement. it hinges upon "further aggression". what [i]if[/i] there is no further aggression? then what happens? i know, i know, we are not discussing MCXA or other such takers of the "french route" in global wars, but still... it could happen.

[quote name='Wishywashy' timestamp='1296969040' post='2621369'] My apologies. I'm not sure why the mindless trolling of this, ah, announcement struck me as more pointless and sad than any other announcement. You're definitely at liberty to complain about them announcing their conflict with you and...or...wait..whatever it is that you were trolling about. I guess you're not the only one going senile. [/quote] you can call it "trolling" just as soon as you can show me a single definitive statement in that "announcement". til then, you can just call me dr. obvious.