Jump to content

The Mongol-Swedes

Members
  • Posts

    920
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The Mongol-Swedes

  1. The LSF, as a member of PWN/PWNAGE, acted on behalf of a general sentiment to aid the Brotherhood in developing its Pink trades and helping their government to explore fruitful foreign affairs relations not only with Pink but, in general, other alliances which would help to bring TCB prosperity when it lacked direction. These efforts were met with significant frustration as there was no real response from TCB. I can fully appreciate the frustration of Bel Air's membership, and others who attempted to assist TCB, and I see the words here by leading figures like Vilien, hizzy, and other detractors who I assume understand what it means to be frustrated when things don't work out to be unnecessarily confrontational and indicative of the lack of positive character in the alliances they represent as significant figures. I will not be drawn into a 'no u', as it becomes clear that anything that is said in public here on out by PWN/PWNAGE members was already extensively expressed in private channels, and the liberty to express frustration in public ought not to be censored or frowned upon. Pointless trolling has been highlighted here. Thread's over.

    I wish TCB the best of luck in finding themselves. We'll keep the light on and the door open.

    o7 Centurions!

  2. So you're telling me that I've been making your allies feel uncomfortable by being asked to join Solidarity by them? Okay.

    You looking for a truce? Or just blowing smoke? Sounds like you got a communication problem with 'em. And remember, it's a two-way street.

    C'mon, put away the hatchet and be a good neighbor. You've come off as being confrontational. Get a conference room, host a conference, resolve your issues. I'll even get my admin team to work on it. But don't come on here and insult my allies and then me. That's just pointless, if you really wanna be a good neighbor.

    If you wanna start a rumble, though, go right ahead.

  3. Dude, you REALLY don't listen well. I don't give a damn about Red business. That's Red business for Red nations. My business is that you're making my allies uncomfortable. I base that on the fact that they themselves tell me that you're harassing them. Whatever your chauvinistic view is, the point is that they come to my door and tell me that you ain't leaving them be. You don't seem to get that they wanna do their own thing. No matter how nicely you talk, you won't take the hint and take a hike. You think they wanna do business with you when you talk to them like you are? It don't really matter to me how you do it. That's between them and you. All I'm here for is to do what I signed up for, and back my allies. Ain't nothing else to it. No overarching conspiracy theory, etc etc. I don't give a damn what NPO does. They can't hurt me or the LSF. We've survived worse.

  4. Your ability to draw correct conclusions is highly suspect, as Heft pointed out.

    Solidarity argues that Red Dawn has been exclusionary and hostile. That's simply not the case. Red unity means red unity, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with continuing to attempt to create some real unity on our sphere. They can do what they want, but that doesn't make it any less pointless. It's creating an arbitrary division in our sphere where none should exist.

    I can't imagine that some of these guys, whom I've been in the trenches with on and off over the years, would all of a sudden start trouble by taking their affairs into their own hands and doing their business amongst themselves unless somebody made 'em feel really uncomfortable. I know SWF for a fact ain't war-starters. So something has to be going on that spooked 'em. And it seems even more plausible to me because you've got people from outside of the sphere, as well as yourself, who want Red Dwan as the sole color bloc.

    Seeing as how I've got pink's affairs to worry about, what happens on Red ain't my business. What IS my business is that you insist on harassing my allies in the SWF who wanna be left alone. They don't wanna play over at your house, and you sound like you wanna be a good neighbor. Start acting like one.

  5. We've been offering them membership since day one, and we'll keep doing it. There's no need for opposition economic treaties, this isn't 2006.

    You don't listen well. They wanna do their thing, so why not let 'em? I don't understand. I can't draw any other conclusion other than: "Everything under OUR tent, no exceptions." That's a helluva departure from your original stance.

  6. Oh boy, another post with no content. We've never intended to stop "Solidarity" from peaceful growth, in fact, you may note the places where I've invited them to join Red Dawn multiple times. Do you actually have anything to say?

    Yeah. Quit insulting these guys with your sham offers. They already formed a bloc. You're basically trying to recruit 'em like the bums who try to recruit from small alliances. At least try to live up to some kind of moral code.

  7. I am the night and the day. Do not pretend to understand my motives.

    All by your onesies? You must be working overtime. You'll have to legislate yourself some time-and-a-half.

    Anyhow, give it a rest. You can't stop Solidarity from its peaceful growth, short of dropping the ball and kicking off some beautiful green fireworks. If you're a gambling man, roll the dice, or leave the table.

  8. I guess NPO needs to pave the way for their re-emergence into Bob Proper. What with a retinue of micro-alliance cheerleaders, bribed with a Senate seat as a gesture of goodwill and a facilitation of smooth reintegration into the New Hegemony structure, and the poor execution of this treaty here by the UED leadership, have all come together to make one hell of a propaganda victory for Pacifica.

    Not too shabby. I certainly won't underestimate you anytime soon.

  9. Yeah but you leftists do like to chant on about workers of the world being united. I mean, why not just get it over with and merge merge merge, you all have the same ideology, why remain in separate alliances?

    No, we don't. Some of us have governments, with hierarchy and rigid process, while others are ruled directly by all members in a direct democracy. There is a lot more to this than you seem to notice. Why not stop by our forums and find out? You can start with the LSF, right in my sig.

  10. ODPs aren't worthless, that isn't the point TBB was trying to make.

    Unity is a nice word, and its really misused with this treaty. You all like each other, that's cool. You wanted to sign a treaty with each other, that's cool too. This is in no way a Unity treaty though. Unity doesn't come around by signing a treaty, unity comes by saying "What one of us do, all of us do." An ODOAP does not say that, what it says is "If something happens, we're highly encouraged to do something, but if we don't, meh." If you want unity try making an MADP Bloc for leftists, then I'd be impressed.

    MADPs are inherently imperialistic and contrary to anti-authoritarian Leftism, which has been on the rise following Silent's fall into obscurity.

    If you don't understand, then don't worry about it. Scroll up and move on.

  11. ^^^ just watched the latest south park episode and i kind of think different about that picture...

    but LSF rocks, it's a place where the government really listens to what you say!!! As if you don't even listen to yourself then you have a problem :P (sorry couldn't resist the bad humor, just watched some other alliances threads)

    Government? Brother, what have you been inhaling? We have no need for basement-dwelling jerks who crave authority over other basement-dwelling jerks.

×
×
  • Create New...