Jump to content

Ninja R

Members
  • Posts

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ninja R

  1. I'm glad to see this was discovered on 3/11.  

    My favorite 311 song is Come Original, followed closely by Beautiful Disaster...then maybe Down and All Mixed Up.  I didn't like their cover of The Cure's "Lovesong." The first two songs are in my Amazon Music playlist called Songs I Like, which is a playlist of around 430 songs and it's what I listen to when I'm just driving around or mowing grass or whatever.

    Speaking of Post Grunge, my 73-year-old father and I were talking about music.  He mentioned he really liked Nickelback, then transitioned into getting tickets to a .38 Special concert. He was really looking forward to the show, but was disappointed because, "everyone around us stood up and was yelling and singing, and I just wanted to watch the show."  He said he'll never go to another concert like that.  I suggested that he should write sternly-worded letters to the venue and .38 Special, and then just stick to post grunge.

    He also said he liked "that song that goes, 'I'm still just a rat in a cage.'"  I might buy him that double album set for his birthday.

  2. 1 minute ago, King Cyan said:

     

    Well since you asked so nicely...

     

    unknown.png

     

    ^^ All his wars the past few years. 

     

     

    Few years.....well, OK.  I've been back for a year, but sure, let's talk a bunch more about my time in CN instead of how you're paying the price for your upper tiers because they're totally busy.

    Like no one else is busy.

  3. 2 minutes ago, A1ph4 0m3ga said:


    As the OP made very clear, we told our allies to focus elsewhere. None of y’all were worth the time or the pixels. They said too bad because you all are too easy a target.

     

    Now we have a bet on how long y’all last before asking for peace.

    Those are all very convenient excuses for your top nations to stay in PM......it's totally not worth coming out of peace mode to crush the opposition because it's.......too easy.

    Can I get in on this bet?

  4. 4 minutes ago, HeroofTime55 said:


    You should probably talk to like, idunno, 80% of your coalition about that, before you start whining at us about less than half a dozen nations that couldn't make it.  lol.

    You seem to have a problem remembering my mentions of upper tiers.  I don't know how.  I've said it like 15 times by now.  Upset, maybe.

  5. 1 minute ago, A1ph4 0m3ga said:


    You need to calm down and catch your breath. I’m worried about you.

     

    1. Our “upper” tier wasn’t our upper tier when this war started. They have been in pm from the beginning and from our fighting rose to where they are.

    2. You being upset that our allies hit you for hitting us is about as dumb as KoRT hitting us for their allies hitting us. 
    3. Please stay upset. It warms our souls and our gov chat is enjoying your whining. 
    4. CCC somehow manipulated our three closest allies to be meatshields for, checks real quick, 5 nations who have been in pm for two months. Sorry about that @Lyanna Mormont @dev0win @Sauron

    1. And they're still in PM for some crazy, crazy reason.
    2. I don't care if your allies hit us.
    3. I'm super upset.
    4. I don't think CCC manipulated anyone.  I think your upper tiers are afraid.

    While you're wondering about people being upset, maybe you should start asking your own folks to lend a hand.

  6. 2 minutes ago, HeroofTime55 said:


    Your argument is that we.... relieved pressure from our allies?  Isn't this the point? Am I missing something here?

    Never underestimate the power of the three-way break off flank attack.

    Or it could be that you're allowing CCC's top tiers to stay out of the war because they've been super, super busy for like, weeks. I mean, WEEKS.

    At some point, these excuses shouldn't be believed and someone could....I don't know, apply pressure and say, "Ay, maybe you ought to start getting your hands dirty."

  7. Just now, Lyanna Mormont said:

     

    I mean, if you wanted more wars? You all could have declared on Non Grata since we hit your allies, but you chose to hit CCC. Sorry, chose is the wrong word, you were told by your handlers that you were not allowed to hit Non Grata and because you are so obedient, you listened. I'm sure The Killer Turtle Brigade, what is left of them, understands. 

    Who this "you all" you're referring to?  I don't hold a leadership position and set no policy.

    How long are you prepared to let CCC's upper tier feel better about their pixels while everyone else pays the price?

  8. I'm not sure what narrative you're paying attention to, but I wrote what I wrote.  I mean, if you want to call that everyone else's narrative, that's fine -- it's wrong, but it's fine.  

    But you've had to pay quite a bit for your upper tiers, too, so it doesn't surprise me you'd run to their defense.  If everyone else has to pay so they can feel better, that's cool.

  9. 1 minute ago, HeroofTime55 said:


    Commence the whining!

    Whining about what, dude?  Pointing out your alliance just declared war so CCC's top tiers can stay comfortable isn't really whining.  If you guys wanna be suckers to maintain friendships, that's gonna have to be on you.  You're the one paying for it.

    That's not whining. That's reality.

    Have fun paying for someone else's pixels.

     

  10. 1 minute ago, Rhizoctonia said:

     

     

    Not to worry, the nation almost 7 years old with just over 1 mil casualties wants to talk about fighting and not letting others "do their work." 

    Well, about a year old, really, since I let my nation go inactive for like 6 years, but that's fine if you want to keep talking about all that.  Anything else you needed to know?  I mean, I've fought every time I've been asked.

    And then there's CCC, complaining about work/life balance or something.  I mean, they don't seem to have had a problem logging in over the past few weeks, so they can't be too busy.

    But then, I haven't ducked out to PM, either, and I'm not going to do it as long as there are lower tiers fighting.

  11. 1 minute ago, A1ph4 0m3ga said:


    Oh no they figured out our master plan of people having RL’s and not being able to participate. Whatever will we do? 

    Oh, I don't know...fight?  Not expect your lower tiers to do your work for you? Do something other than "plan"?  

    There's three right there.  Feel free to ask for more if you want.

  12. A working plate tectonics mechanism should be in place on Planet Bob, especially if Bob has earthquakes (I don't remember seeing volcanism).  Otherwise, Bob will expand and contract accordingly.  As plates subduct into the aesthenosphere, nations would lose land. This could happen over periods of millions of years, so no one would ever really notice the difference.

     

  13. On 1/31/2022 at 3:49 PM, jerdge said:

    Listen, I didn't give your latest posts a second look, they earned my indifference. Life's too short to waste time on trash.

    Yeah, my bad, dude.  I didn't mean to remind you of the reality of a situation or anything like that.  I think being indifferent toward the truth is something you should focus on in the future....however short that might be for you.

  14. 1 hour ago, kerschbs said:


    This is correct. Sirwilliam is 100% the aggressor, and having a gov member of an alliance hit someone without leaving the AA is generally assumed as that alliance hitting someone. To pretended otherwise is ridiculous. 

    I'll refer you back to the directives from him in our private dispatches -- then you can tell me how much "government" he really is.  He's literally a figurehead who does absolutely nothing and has no active role.

    But hey, maybe if someone could have gotten a hold of us in our channel to raise the wtf flag, someone official would have said, "Yep, that's SW, go ahead and attack him as much as you want."

    Could have sworn I'd written something like this already, but not reading things is par for the course here.

  15. 20 minutes ago, jerdge said:

    I'm not backtracking, I gave Kashmir the benefit of doubt, it's just SOP. They didn't really want peace, I found out about it. That's all.

    This is outright nonsense.  You decided to give Kashmir the benefit of the doubt *after* you decided not to give them the benefit of the doubt and made this declaration.

    And then, UH OH!, you expected Kashmir to do absolutely nothing after you made this declaration.  I'm not entirely sure why you expected that, but it's what you did. Then you pretended you really wanted diplomacy all along.

    These were your decisions.  We're just reacting to them in ways you don't like.

  16. 35 minutes ago, jerdge said:

    It's GPA policy to consider the other party's explanation of what happened worthy of a diplomatic effort to de-escalate things.

     

    Then you have Kashmir telling us that they're not going on an offensive and they need to talk with SW, and then send three more attackers two hours later.

     

    I'll let you work out by yourself who backtracked and who's being aggressive here.

    Oh, it's greenpeace policy to consider the other party's explanation? Is that before or after you declare war?

    So sure, let me work out who backtracked: You "recognized hostilities" first without considering anything whatsoever except your own shortsighted policy built on nonsense you would never dare to try with anyone else.  We recognized your declaration as well.  You don't have to like it, but that's what it is.

    Your declaration here was the initial aggression, then you backpedaled pretty quick.  We expected the same thing from you that virtually every other alliance expects -- a heads up, a little diplomacy, something.

    You didn't even bother with that.  Not sure why, but you definitely don't seem to like it anymore.  So yeah, we recognized your declaration and we're holding you to it.  You don't have to like that, either.

  17. 10 hours ago, jerdge said:

    UPDATE: for the time being "Kashmir" means "SirWilliam only". See below for further details.

     

    Well, that was a convenient update, wasn't it? You went on at length telling the world in general over multiple dispatches: greenpeace's stance on government members' actions speak for the entire alliance.

    Now you're backtracking on that stance. Is it greenpeace policy to *not* recognize government members' actions speaking for the entire alliance now?

    Regardless, .gov already recognized your recognition.  They get to decide when that changes, not you.

  18. 1 hour ago, jerdge said:

    Kashmir attacked, the GPA did not. To this moment, the only Kashmir nation at war with GPA nations is SirWilliam's, Kashmir's Owner, and he's the aggressor.

    Yes, Kashmir is responsible for the actions of its Owner.

    We haven't escalated anything, we have only publicly clarified where we stand. Then people, you included, started to cry because of my big threatening words.

    There's a saying about not going into the kitchen if you can't take the heat, but this is on par with not being able to take the heat of the kitchen's refrigerator.

     

    It's true, anyway, that I didn't came to Kashmir's servers to say the same things I posted here. Not wanting to spend more time then what was strictly needed played a role in that, along with the intent to timely publicly clarify what was happening and our views about it. I knew that Kashmir would have had the opportunity to have its say, anyway, which in fact it definitely took advantage of.

    If it made a difference, I apologize, I'm not known for being infallible, for sure. But, does it make a difference? Is Kashmir willing to disown SirWilliam's aggression?

    Since it was needed to make a point about it, Kashmir might want to also explicitly explain its stance about the issue.


    Kashmir didn't attack.  You know good and well Kashmir didn't attack.  SW did.  

    Now, you can sit there all day insisting SW's actions define an entire alliance's actions, but that doesn't make it true.

    In fact, here are SW's last 10 messages in our private channel posted *just for you*.  I can probably go back a few months like this.  Here are his directives:
     

    Quote

    GG @Rud25, you just advanced to level 1 :jason8: :hakai:
    GG @The Splendiferous Beaker, you just advanced to level 9
    GG @Violated Troutbish LOL, you just advanced to level 6 :jason8: :hakai:
    GG @The Splendiferous Beaker, you just advanced to level 8 :jason8: :hakai:
    GG @Serberus, you just advanced to level 9 :jason8: :hakai:
    GG @SalL6350, you just advanced to level 11 :jason8: :hakai:
    GG @SalL6350, you just advanced to level 10 :jason8: :hakai:
    GG @S to the E to the D., you just advanced to level 31 :jason8: :hakai:
    GG @Violated Troutbish LOL, you just advanced to level 5 :jason8: :hakai:
    GG @Serberus, you just advanced to level 8 :jason8: :hakai:


    Like I said, inactive in leadership for months. 

    And even when it's blatantly obvious there's one dude doing his thing and it's not exactly the alliance doing his thing, you ran here to *recognize hostilities* against the entire alliance when you know that's not the case at all.

    And that's fine; you can sit around ignoring facts all you want -- that's your prerogative, but don't sit around feigning you're all about diplomacy and reason when it's exceeding clear from this post you aren't interested in it.  

    You want to go after SW?  Fine, no one cares because *he* doesn't care.  PZI him if you want.  I'll send your dudes aid to do it.

×
×
  • Create New...