Romeo Valenti

[quote name='Flonker' timestamp='1319836586' post='2833982'] Gonna call in some more allies, eh? Go for it. We all know you'll throw them all under the bus, just like you threw BTA, IAA, & NsO under the bus. Tetris is toast, no matter what you say. NSO isn't in much better shape (can you say '5k NS nuclear powers'?). You'll tear up our bottom rungs, but they can and [b]WILL[/b] be rebuilt. [url=http://www.cybernations.net/search_wars.asp?searchstring=Declaring_Alliance%2CReceiving_Alliance&search=New%20Sith%20Order&anyallexact=exact]This link[/url] shows me that only 8 of the last 40 wars between Legion and NSO were declared by NSO. For an alliance supposedly on its last legs, I'd say a 4 to 1 edge in offensive declarations tells a lot about what's left of NSO. 6 of your top 10 nations are in peace mode. Your [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display_charts.asp?Nation_ID=317239]5th ranked nation[/url], Fingolfin, went from 110K NS down to 45.7k NS, propped up only by his 7K tech. He's been turtling, just keeping up his navy to avoid blockades and nuking back. Interesting, since he still has over a billion in WC and can easily re-equip and come back for more. Your top guy joined you 10 days ago at 123K NS and promptly went into PM. You guys are the Black Knight from Monty Python and The Holy Grail. We've cut off your arms and legs, now you want to chew our ankles off. [/quote] As always, I love you Flonker

The flag is ballin'. That is all.

[quote name='Cyber Nationz' timestamp='1298610297' post='2644471'] Dan2680 How about you come out of peace mode, and see if you even last 3 days. Oh I forgot, you sir are a Hippe Warrior. Defcon 1 in peacemode is your best strategy. [/quote] I had to look to make sure you weren't joking. I quietly chuckled about defcon 1 in peace mode.

Damn. I was trading with him! I need a new marble wheat guy now. any takers?

[quote name='Chief Savage Man' date='24 February 2010 - 10:23 AM' timestamp='1267025220' post='2201459'] Those demonic GOONS. [/quote] LOLcasm?

[quote name='martinius the great' date='18 February 2010 - 01:19 PM' timestamp='1266517188' post='2189910'] I think you've failed to read our DoW topic, but I tell you this for the 100th time: Our allies at Aircastle asked us for help and we helped them, plain and simple. Their allies were being attacked, an attack upon one of their allies is like an attack upon them (because Aircastle values treaties very highly, and they aren't treaty whores). An attack upon Aircastle means an attack upon DF. I need no more E-lawyering. [/quote] /me chuckles. Let's follow this logic a bit more, shall we? For the sake of argument, we have 5 alliances, titled Alliance A through Alliance E. Alliance A attacks Attacks Alliance B. Alliance B has an MDP with Alliance C. Alliance C calls Alliance A's attack on Alliance B an attack on them as well. Alliance D, who has minimal interaction with Alliance B, Has an MDP with Alliance C. Because Alliance C declares the attack on alliance B to be an attack on alliance C, Alliance D, decides the attack is an attack on Alliance D as well. Alliance E, who by this point in the treaty web, has no interaction with Alliance B whatsoever, Has an MDP with Alliance D. Alliance E then claims Alliance A attacked them first? Is it just me or does this seem tragically flawed in some way?

It "has came to our attention..." I chuckled. Thanks for the Hoo.

I read the OP. I chuckled. Thank you.

harassment seems a strong phrase for a few requests to buy the release of a nation. perhaps Kobi should have put more thought into the decision to press that reply button, but this still does not change the fact that Kingem actively sought out and harassed Kobi.

If you read the logs again, it seems as though Kingem was the initiator. He first messaged Kobiashiy for the sole reason of harassing him for his comment made in this thread. Kobiashiy did not, as you so ignorantly worded it, "Get all bent out of shape" in those logs, but rather simply tried to defend his original post. Seems like Kingem was a jerk twice over from where I'm standing.

good luck! o7 TCoC

Creating an alliance and placing it on a color sphere has very little to do with, as you put it most ignorantly "doing whats right". In my humble opinion, there nothing wrong with making sure the odds are stacked in your favor before taking the leap of becoming a newly formed alliance. Had they tried to place an alliance on the red sphere before the NPO-stomping began, what would you guess their chances of success would have been? Think before you speak as this has, from where I am standing at any rate, NOTHING to do with whats right and whats not. Regards -Romeo Valenti

I you Leonid!!!

I laughed so hard at the picture! Thank you for that Molon Labe.

o/ post. Yay for flonker lurve!!!!