Alter Leader Nabla

You'd be correct. See, we can agree on some things!

The infra-hugging one.

Almost missed this one. WC, can't you see the errors of your form?

I did that in an effort of Peace and mutual understanding. Since we are discussing possibilities, causalities and morality of an event, I thought it would fit perfectly.

I implied an actuality where you did not. I corrected your sentence that misguided your thoughts as being mean to us. It's okay, I explained in my post why this form is more correct

With more seriousness, one can assume that we have seen the errors of our ways, as the old adage says. Opening and further reading some existencialism philosophy, we can safely assume that truth is to be said in Sartre's words : "Existence is preceding Essence". While the directions of this link has vastly be discussed, we can safely assume that there exist a correlation between Existence (Processus, Activity) and Essence (Potential, To be). (if not, works of Kant, Hegel, Albert Camus, Platon & Aristote might be good leads). Seeing the errors of our ways, you still say that IRON is still around. The semantics of the sentence are oddly turned. We can basically separate these two elements. is defines a matter-of-fact as in Whitehead's philosophy. Factually, it is a state of the questionned entity, here being IRON. IRON is, Implies that IRON stands out as in the old latin ex(out) - stare(stance). However, Can we really say that IRON stands out as per Doitzel post, it seems not! Intriguing... still around Implies an essence. What is Mostly IRON? Well, it's still around. Mostly, IRON is being reduced to "still" being around. What would you imply by that WarriorConcept? Are we being too much in the cyberverse? Arrived to this point, I stopped my tought and thought. "Damn, WarriorConcept is being mean." and posted. Then again, you send me back to this strange sentence. Maybe I didn't dig far enough, what does "around" mean in this precise situation. What is this around exactly? Used with the verb to be around has here a special signification : Alive, existent, or present. existent : now that's something interesting. Let's read the sentence again. wich following the current semantic signified analysis (the signifier analysis would be interesting as well). now that's interesting. the link existence - essence is truly being put forward. Idiots might see a circular logic but it's really even more semantically intresequed. Linguistically, it's interesting to see that the two part of a being are being put together so closely. Then again, there is this part that we have not decrypted yet. Et tu es, obivously is linked to the first part. I, as well, am, still around Now appealing to an ad hominem argument, I could claim that WarriorConcept does not like me and defines me as annoying further proving my claim of his meaningness. But let's not enter it. My Existence is also linked to an essence implying existence. Furthermore, my existence is linked to IRON existence in a semantic manner. How shocking. being part of IRON defines my identity as per WarriorConcept terms as being part of IRON, reductive indeed. Then again I claim we have seen the errors of our ways. Therefore, IRON essence would surely have CHANGED due to an EXISTENCE, more exactly in this case, Karma War. A vulgarisation of it would be to say that the IRON of yesterday is not the IRON of today. Let us see our schema once again. The Essence is being changed, we can therefore write. a new essence implies a new existence, therefore interfering with the first OLD. We can clearly see a paradox forming there (CB TOP, Lol twice the same joke). What is meant there by WarriorConcept The IRON of yesterday is still around. But IRON has changed, WarriorConcept. therefore me claiming "We have seen the errors of our ways", We did change. Wich moreover explains my presence here "And you are". Therefore you cannot claim what you just claimed we are not still around WC, We are around. And We're going to hug our infra even more

But you've shown us the errors of our ways. Why are you being so mean

It's all TOP fault. See, it's PARADOXIA. HAHAHA I WON THIS E-LAWYERING CASE DOWN WITH TOP!

You're right. You're a Warrior, as per your name. The world around you is made of infra-huggers.

We are all going to PEACE MODE because we are to spread love on the cyberverse. We will harm no-one, no one will harm, our infra is away from those who wish to take my precious.

I agree with Warriorconcept, Clearly, MK & its friends are trying to make Planet Bob a peaceful place once again. Shame on you!

Hahahahaha, Oh wow, Athens, you never cease to amaze me. Also, Peace!

Nonononununues, you don't get it. We aren't going to war see because that would fuel hartred in the world. Re-read Doitzel Post, be enlightened by his beautiful words and feel free once again. Truly We have become Independent! No one can call us RON again!

Why, my thank you.

We just want to give peace a chance!

Voted "Already Cancelled" "Today" and "No" I feel we deserve it.

We won't, Doitzel as shown us the way. We will hug our infra.

Hey hey, now people, this a thread to show us the light : we should be at peace with each other and hug our infra. There's absolutely no need to fight.

Except the secret ones.

Then again, your logic is flawed! Indeed, If you fuel peace with war, we can only have more wars because, you see, acts of war during the war will lead to a new war wich will itself cause more acts of war during the war leading to a new war! Then again you might say "Athens was not a war with TPF". However, attacking TPF is an act of war against IRON since they seems to be our friends. Answering it would lead to AN ACT OF WAR. OH NO! This is why we will just ignore this attack to provide the PEACE TO CN. I fear that I have said too much, I will probably get fired from IRON for REVEALING OUR MASTER PLAN. But if that is the price to pay for IRON, well I'm sure I can make a career in MK.

All these arguments just show that you all want to work towards peace. I appreciate it.

Act of war is such an harsh word. I'd rather say "a necessary action towards a long-lasting peace". You need to see the bigger picture. Well, There cannot be peace without war.

I always highly thought of MK. Also, If it can protect peace, well : it's a necessary evil.

Absolutely, the settlement of the IRON problem, which has now been achieved is, in my view, only the prelude to a larger settlement in which all CN may find peace. This morning we have had the pleasure to read the discourse made by the Jedi Order leader, Doitzel. Most of you, perhaps, have already seen his paper. We regard Doitzel speech as symbolic of the desire of our people never to go to war with one another again.

Don't be sarcastic. It was a BRILLIANT political move.