Jump to content

Sileath

Members
  • Posts

    1,521
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sileath

  1. Why do you think I don't like MK, and didn't like Sparta for quite some time? Because your governments did not care about that either. The perpetrators were Rey the Great (MK) and Tyler (Sparta). Edit: This is the incident I refer to in my profile as "Market rate for getting the head recruiter expelled - 2000 technology"
  2. Provide evidence of me saying that or take that back. You crossed a line there. Haha bad egg Maybe they looked like idiots because they lied to me? With The Family, my bad for defending my comrades from attack. I am obviously rather ridiculous. Why, so you can run to them and tell them not to accept me? That's what TheNeverender did with tF. I'm flattered that MK has me in their heart and mind.
  3. Sup Doitzel, why you talking about things you know nothing about? Have we ever been in an alliance together, or do you only know what you hear from people on the OWF? Here's a run down of reasons for leaving alliances. NPO - Resigned following a rant in the Diplomatic Corps channel /A\/A\ - Expelled for having +o in #blackstonecollusion STA - Resigned to join NSO NSO - Resigned due to citizenry not being informed of Frostbite treaty before it hit the OWF Athens - Resigned due to Londo not caring that a member of MK and a member of Sparta were trying to bribe other government officials to get me expelled, also Londo's lying about knowing about me using NSO's recruitment parser MHA - Resigned to fight BTA CG - Resigned due to refusal to surrender to Dynomite Pact tF - Expelled as part of peace deal with GDI
  4. With NSO and Athens, you're not being specific. I said to be specific. Yes, I left MHA to attack BTA, exactly how does that harm MHA? Go ask Crushtania what he thinks of me, or just check out the quote by him in my sig. Crimson Guard specifically told me that if I joined they would not recognize Dynomite Pact. Once I was a member, I was told I would have to surrender to them. I don't care too much for lying. Why would people want me in their alliance? People like me. I'm a swell guy. I'm also not an infra-hugger. Here's you, Jack. Nation Created: 6/28/2007 9:40:59 PM (774 days old) Number of Soldiers Lost in All Wars. 105,598 Attacking + 323,297 Defending = 428,895 Casualties Here's me. Nation Created: 1/8/2009 2:25:28 AM (214 days old) Number of Soldiers Lost in All Wars. 379,986 Attacking + 467,159 Defending = 847,145 Casualties So, you've been around more than three times as long as me, and I have double the casualties. You can talk a game, and espouse histrionics in ALL CAPS, but I'm willing to fight for what I believe. Plus, I'm interesting, and you can't put a price tag on that. Negative. MK granted me white peace.
  5. Since I have never said a word or taken an action against Polaris, I'll bite. What exactly would make me unappealing to an alliance? Be specific please.
  6. I am aware, I was just speculating that NSO could invoke the Moldavi Doctrine to declare on me via your blanket oAP. Not bloody likely. I already have a new alliance lined up, will be joining in a few days.
  7. You're not the first person to swear this, and yet here I still stand. Far better people than you have failed in running me out of the cyberverse, what makes you think you will succeed? Also, lol at your case for ZI/PZI, "He defended his comrades!" Hey, will this be the first invocation of the new Moldavi Doctrine? NSO fighting me to put an end once and for all to defending alliance mates. Gotta take a stand on something.
  8. Did you think of that comment all by yourself Griff? Also, I won't be homeless for long
  9. I am obtaining the reps through my winning ground attacks.
  10. It's not an analogy. Read an economic guide, then you will know what a sled is, and what it means to break it. (Breaking it was necessary, once cannot leave peace mode without first collecting taxes.)
  11. I know, I suck right? I break a sled to defend a comrade, then I resign from my alliance so it can achieve peace! Now I'm in 5 wars and kicking everyone's $@!. lolSileath
  12. Four incoming ground attacks, four glorious victories. I guess you should have thought twice before you declared war on the former squad leader of the Beta Bashers, best !@#$@#$ NPO squad south of Epsilon! o/ Beta Bashers
  13. To assist in the peace process for tF, I have resigned. All you haters, you have a problem with me? Come get some!
  14. CM's destroy infra, which reduce the number of citizens in a nation, which reduce the number of soldiers/tanks one can purchase, which makes the tech raid easier.
  15. Blackjack was away for the vast majority of that negotiation, Tanis did not have the authority to enter into such an agreement without the approval of several other people.
  16. Please clarify what your definition of "ignorance" is if it is not to "speak without knowing the facts."
  17. This^ Any retaliation by FAIL or an ally of FAIL against Sorum due to the tech raid would have been seen as consequential to the raid itself, and we would not have taken action against that people. What exactly do you expect when you attack innocent members?
  18. A non-government member saying tF is at peace =/= signed peace treaty. Similarly, me saying tF is at war does not make it so. We have a chain of command you know.
  19. This cannot be emphasized enough. If GDI cared about defending FAIL, they would have attacked Sorum, not uninvolved nations.
  20. That's up to Sorum whether or not he wants to pay reps to RV. The nation with protectors could have taken it up with the person who attacked them - as it was a tech raid, we would not have get involved. The argument that tF supported this tech raid is flawed - if you thought that, GDI would have attacked Sorum, and you would have seen that we would not have defended him. Instead, you attacked uninvolved nations to guarantee we would defend our comrades then tried to play it off as us setting up Sorum to start an alliance war.
  21. This^ GDI could have jumped Sorum, but instead you chose to attack other tF nations. You made this an alliance war, not us.
  22. We want reparations due to innocent nations being attacked.
  23. I figure by this point people need a tl;dr. Past: Sorum raids Rebel Virginia -> Rebel Virginia !@#$%*es about it on the OWF, makes an ultimatum to tF -> GDI attacks tF nations -> During negotiations, a non-government member of tF makes an agreement to GDI for peace -> Rest of tF rejects this peace -> Defense of tF nations continues Present: Rebel Virginia !@#$%*es that tF is defending its members, GDI declares war on tF for defending its members Future: tF blows up RV and GDI via superior military tactics.
  24. We supported the fact that our charter allows our members to tech raid, and weren't going to expel Sorum for raiding This does not mean we supported the idea of Sorum raiding RV, or that we were going to defend him militarily.
×
×
  • Create New...