Jump to content

MercyFallout

Members
  • Posts

    1,409
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MercyFallout

  1. A program to get nations with only 15 K NS to buy nukes? Attention already grabbed. Protecitng allies, cheap tech, forum link, and personal aspects like great community atmosphere. Out of all the messages I received, this is probably the best one. Good job IAA. A small alliance that will have great success.

    Anyone have any interesting, and/or lame messages they would like to share?

    I will neither confirm nor deny the role of the current military regime of the Imperial Fleet in this said program.

    Though I will confirm that it does exist and does work.

  2. Go read my essay and comment there.

    1) Explain the legal link between the old IAA and new one. There is none.

    2) Both versions of VE are recognized to be different alliances, and furthermore, your IAA does not have the same charter, making your argument even weaker.

    strawman

    1. Read your essay. Agree with Starfox.

    2. Legal Link? Go read what I wrote again. There isn't one and there doesn't need to be one. If the community decides it wants to get back together (or in this case, get back from the Unknown Regions formally), then they can do it.

    3. They recognize that they are a new incarnation but they never denied being the successors or the continuation of VE.

    4. Strawman? Your entire "refute" to my point was talking about me babbling on about some nonsensical thing that didn't relate to FA policy.

  3. That I "folded the alliance under pressure."

    @mercyfallout: Why don't you show exactly how I am not right.

    1. When every single IAA member who was there pre-disbandment says that Chimaera was their emperor and he left because if he didn't IAA wouldn't ever possibly get peace terms and you say the opposite, I'm inclined to believe the majority. Because they aren't power-thirsty fools who want nothing more than to stick their hooks into a growing alliance and try to illegitimize (yes, I realize that isn't a word) it.

    2. Government =/= alliance. Never IC, never OOC. NEVER does the government = the alliance (with the exception of a few such as LSF...though I think LSF has some resemblance of a formal government now). The government is simply the mouthpiece of the alliance. The face of the community. The community, as basically everyone but you can realize, is the alliance. Because if there is no community, who the heck are you going to lead? Yourself. And that would probably be it.

    3. "Not legal". There is no IC or OOC law that says you cannot reform an alliance. Thus, there is absolutely NO legal basis in which you can say that the IAA of today is not the continuation of the IAA of yesterday. Precedent, in fact, isn't on your side either. VE reformed claiming the same name and to be the same alliance that disbanded under foreign threat (hmm, in a manner very similar to IAA) and that is accepted as fact. Because it is fact. The community returned to share the same alliance name and same charter. The alliance lives again. It doesn't matter who was leading it, if the same people (at least in part...and in IAA's case the vast majority of former IAA'ers have returned) then the alliance continues on.

    4. Whether you honor treaties or not is a very vital part of foreign affairs policy. In fact, it would be the breaking point. If you don't honor your treaties, regardless of your political status, who the heck is going to sign a treaty with you or be close to you? Not many.

  4. Its always amusing how you never diverge from your talking points even after their proven wrong. I guess you follow the strategy "telling a lie enough times makes it truth?"

    http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...t&p=1705213

    http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...t&p=1707674

    http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?s...t&p=1708480

    You know, just because you think you're right, doesn't make you right.

    But then again, I suppose you follow the "if I write enough stuff, people will be impressed, and bow down and worship my awesomeness and I shall thus increase the size of my e-malebodypart" doctrine.

×
×
  • Create New...