jimbacher
-
Posts
131 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by jimbacher
-
-
No, these are terms. They just aren't peace terms. Let's not have a semantics argument please.
So if you are trying to end a war you don't give peace terms...seems logical. Where is NPO's incentive to agree to your pre-terms. You can't do much more damage anyways. Most of the non-pm nations will be zied soon enough.(Check my own nation out if you don't believe me.) And we are happy to ride zi too .
-
You're the one electing to stay at war "for eternity" if that's the route you want to go. The purpose of these terms is, in fact, the opposite.
Where do I see terms anywhere. These are terms to "possibly" get terms.
-
Pm NS-----------------Pm infra-----------------Pm Tech
5040583.514----------889875.21---------------272008.12
Total NS----------------Total infra---------------Total Tech
7,484,085--------------1,130,983----------------528,720
%-----------------------%-------------------------%
0.673506984-----------0.786815726-------------0.51446535
Only 2.5 million NS of pacifica lies outside PM. Which implies around 5k average NS for non PM nations. If you think you can "drop" us to below 5 mill NS, it is not possible. I am not here to argue or anything, just posting stats.
-
Kassad, I am going to miss getting you all worked up about ron paul .
New Pacific Order Reps Race
in Open World RP
Posted
The point of this whole thing argument is we have not been given surrender terms yet. So we pull our nations out of pm and we still get pummeled for another two months. What is the point in that if the whole alliance will be pretty muched zied either way.