Jump to content

jimbacher

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    131

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by jimbacher

  3. The Following Program has been rated G

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    This coming from anyone from the tpf hippy federation is just golden

    Where did you get this from. You guys are seriously messed up. We lost 6/7 of our NS in the karma war. How would that be possible if we were in peace mode, or are you guys hampered when it comes to numerical calculations. We had fewer people in peace mode last war than you guys have in war mode this war. You sir, are a moron.

  7. Imperial Decree - New Polar Order

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    Yeah that's what it is.

    Why don't you grow and leave the playground banter at home. If you're going to argue, bring up legitimate points or just sit it out and let those who have something to say speak.

    OK, I'll post why Polar has a better cb than you. Polar attempted diplomacy(x times by the look of it, which would be x times more than you guys attempted diplomacy with TPF), they have every right to act in their best interest. Also, when your leader is subject to racist clown(s) in a public channel that is maintained by the alliance in question, I don't see how there is any dispute that they have a good cb. I also don't understand how they are being bad allies. Tech raiding other alliance= no no.

  14. Ragnarok Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    I'd like you to review the strategy of those you are presently defending:

    01[23:44] <@Popsumpot[uCN]> yup

    01[23:44] <@Popsumpot[uCN]> Im trolling too

    [23:44] <@Shahenshah[iRON]> repeat repeat repeat

    01[23:44] <@Popsumpot[uCN]> Shah

    [23:44] <@Shahenshah[iRON]> pick on something, then just repeat repeat repeat

    01[23:44] <@Popsumpot[uCN]> this is trolling

    01[23:44] <@Popsumpot[uCN]> reason d oesn't work

    01[23:44] <@Popsumpot[uCN]> it's just volume

    [23:44] <@Shahenshah[iRON]> troll but throw in reason

    [23:44] <@Shan_Revan> Exactly

    [23:44] <@Shahenshah[iRON]> :)

    [23:44] <@Shan_Revan> well

    [23:44] <@Shan_Revan> volume is more important

    [23:45] <@Shan_Revan> but a little reason doesn't hurt

    [23:45] <@Shan_Revan> but mostly volume is what wins

    Now, I have a hard time believing Iron could be genuinely butt hurt after they state this:

    03[18:53] * ChanServ sets mode: +o Shan_Revan

    [18:57] <@Shahenshah[iRON]> lets get m disbanded :D lol

    [18:58] <@Fuhrer[NATO]> :P

    [18:58] <@Haf> We should all DoW on \m/

    [18:58] <@Haf> heh

    [18:58] <@DarkFox[uCN]> I am sure they can handle it

    [18:58] <@Fuhrer[NATO]> :) would be nice

    Class act guys, sure glad you've forgiven and forgot.

    You are spying on allies. I should dow you for that.

  17. Ragnarok Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    Then at best it is of disputed veracity and should not be relied upon, or shown to one's alliance without proper discussion of the possibility that it might not be true.

    Your right, everyone should show both logs and ask their alliance mates..."now which one do you think is real?". But I suspect that is not going to happen.

  18. Ragnarok Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted · Edited by jimbacher

    First of all I don't remember anyone promising that.

    Second, what does that have to do with not wanting to take responsibility for the actions of your leader?

    There is a difference between not wanting to and not willing to. I don't want to get rolled because your buddies thought some bs was a valid cb, but I will get rolled if I need to, because I support my leader. Don't question my loyalty you chump, I was zied in the KARMA was like pretty much everyone else in TPF.

  19. Ragnarok Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    You can't both support him as a leader and at the same time claim you shouldn't have to take responsibility for the action he takes for your alliance.

    Either you support him or not, you apparently do wich is great but it's not athens or anyone else responsibility what your leader does. Ultimately it falls down on TPF as a whole.

    What about this new lovy dovy era of peace and understanding the karma war was supposed to bring in. Guess that all was a lie.

  21. Ragnarok Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    <Vespassianus> I have spies in most big alliances

    You can call my logs fake but you have no proof.

    If you don't want to defend your leader the best course of action would be to leave the alliance. (zomg mk is trying to force tpf members to leave)

    I never said I didn't support or won't defend mhawk. Quite the contrary actually, I think mhawk is a great leader.

  23. Ragnarok Announcement

    in Alliance Announcements (IC)

    Posted

    Again, as I've said before, I find it insulting (this time highly so) that you'd give others credit for work done by myself and myself alone.

    [edit:] to hell with it, I'll just spell it out. It's insulting that you would attribute something said by me to the whole of Superfriends, or to the whole of the alliances currently at war with TPF. It's also insulting to assume that I speak for everyone, thereby giving them credit when they deserve none, not that they'd want to take credit for my words, but it's insulting nonetheless

    Well then we are in agreement, TPF should not have been attacked since I(and general membership) had no idea about this ordeal that is Roks + Athens cb. Since our leader would be the one responsible, why did they attack the whole alliance without any sort of diplomacy?

  24. Athens does it again

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    Repeating it makes you right! TPF didn't just think about it, they put the plan into action.

    Your right, we caused Athens to disband, and noone DoWed us. Oh wait, Athens is still here but UED is not. So while you would say we are guilty of attempted spying during wartime, Athens is guilty of sabotaging an alliance during peacetime and causing an alliance to fold. I love this new age we live in.

  25. Athens does it again

    in World Affairs (IC)

    Posted

    I don't know who in the world TimLee is except for the one presented in this log. And considering that UED's ministers were the ones whom wanted the protection from Athens in order to survive as any normal alliance normally does, I'm still lost as to what argument you're trying to make.

    Also nice nazi reference :awesome:

    Watch it OBM we might get cbed by MK for the use of the word Herr.

×
×
  • Create New...