potato
-
Posts
3,305 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by potato
-
-
Individual MQ nations didn't say they wouldn't pay reps to TDO, just that they wouldn't pay reps to people like NATO, TPF, FARK and who ever else attacked us because they thought this would be an opportunity to finally get their pitiful revenge before we move on.
You can pretend you're on a croisade all you want, no one believes you.
-
If I had any hopes that you morons would understand things at the first attempt, I wouldn't have to repeat things.
-
Fark wants reps? From people that went rogue on them? Or on their friends? oh the horror of it! Oh the humanity!!!!
I may be wrong but I don't recall MQ nations hitting FARK first. Nor their friends. Unless you want to go the silly route of "omg fark and tdo are soooooooo buttbuddies!1!!", which no one in their right mind would believe anyway.
Nice try. NATO had a number of reasons for engaging which I have been happy to share with anyone who has asked. But we didn't need a reason, because any unaligned group of rogues attacking a legitimate alliance is a sufficient target in its own right (as I would expect NATO nations to be if we ever pulled a stunt like that). The fact that you seem surprised to be targeted and deserving of a special exemption is telling as to your state of mind. Plus, many of us did fight MK while it was an alliance :)
This whole self-serving faux moral outrage regarding "PZI" is totally removed from its historical context. It reflects that rogues such as MQ or Timberland (with a $1b warchest below 5k NS) simply want to get free shots on some weak targets, cause as much damage as possible, and walk away with a round or so of war without any material damage on their warchests or tech levels. The only way to make any meaningful impact relative to losses taken is to keep rogues at war for longer once they have run out of nukes, but that is merely a pragmatic consideration and, in the absence of any attempt by individual rogues to negotiate, hardly represents victimisation of the rogues under some vague (non-explicit) threat of PZI.Perhaps you have some sort of selective reading deficiency. Or perhaps you're putting words in my mouth. Either way, I did state (and let me quote for you so you don't miss it this time) "before anyone gets into it, I really don't care what the anti-MK coalition does, nor am I seeking peace".
I know why you did what you did. Everyone can see right through you. Everyone knows why you did it. It's fine by me, as I said "I really don't care what the anti-MK coalition does, nor am I seeking peace". Just cut the bullshit.
They're also have been quite a few nations trying to get peace individually. But this might be above your pay grade.
-
To the best of my knowledge, we haven't threatened anyone with ZI until deletion...
Not explicitly but you guys (well, FARK but the rest of your "coalition" is too chickenshit to tell them to stop being ridiculous) want the Jihadist to pay reps to get peace. We both know that's not going to happen.
PS: before anyone gets into it, I really don't care what the anti-MK coalition does, nor am I seeking peace. As some of our opponents admitted, you're just getting your last hits on Shrooms because you were not brave enough to do it when we were an alliance. It's all fine and dandy, just be open about it and stop sugarcoating whatever you're doing with the "we're protecting stability" and "we're defending the neutrals" bullshit.
-
Now you know why I won't be coming back, ODN.
-
Maybe it was an urgent need to stress the distance from the game, but you overlooked a crucial part of Dragonshy's question.
On topic: I am rarely on IRC, but when I am it seems rather dead to me. On every channel.Maybe it's a lost in translation thing but I took it as related to CN (you know like the exact words in the OP) not "omg this chan is just about cn". A chan where created by a now defunct CN alliance, where most users still play CN and has quite a few discussions about CN sure does sound to me as CN-related IRC chan.
-
You're right.
I know. Thanks.
-
#mushroom because we don't play CN anymore
-
I was wondering when the rest of the Shrooms would stop (badly) trying to hide their support for Musqaeda and actually enter. Oh well, in a month, you, like your fellow rogues, will have deleted, be turtling, be in peace mode, or have joined another alliance.
I don't anyone in MK hid its support for MQ. It's a pity however, at least for your silly theory, that Teh1337Guy was in Umbrella.
-
-
Your greatest rival was coherence.
You, of all people, shouldn't cast stones like that.
-
So, not everyone plans on following the gameplan just the ones who don't matter, gotcha. Might want to hold a extra team meeting or two, miscommunication like that could lead to avoidable self inflicted mistakes on the field
We know exactly what we're doing. Those who wish to continue and those who wish to leave.
Nice deflection, but you don't know me nearly enough to make that kind of personal attack. Try again, with feeling.
Oh I've seen enough of you to know you're not worthy.
-
If the instigating party wanted to be handed peace on a silver platter they should have considered the consequences before going on their Jihad. I mean most of the Jihadis will be deleting right? So what's the problem.
:o
Maybe they weren't planning to delete to start. Hindsight is 20/20. So, instead of crying about it (a fact I find soo ironic btw), fight until your opposition is tired of hitting you. You've racked up a lot of ill will with a lot of people and now that you've given them the opportunity it's time to reap what you sowed.
Also, lol at the peanut gallery trying to discredit GOP, you guys are hilarious but your posts are definitely shifting the spotlight a bit, so kudos to that.Surprise, surprise. Not everyone in MQ has the same gameplan. I know having a personnality is a foreign concept to you but, surely, you might have heard about it, no?
-
alyster
Now you know why I won't be joining TOP.
-
Mushqaeda made quite a few declarations in the past. You can do some research or you can pretend to know what you're talking about.
-
I'm loving the paranoia!
-
Am I missing something?
Outside a brain?
http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?/topic/118500-a-call-to-jihad/ was a declaration of war by a group who didn't want to be regarded as an alliance?
Now you want to shelter/cover them after they had their fun and are running for the hills after things went wrong?
Does that make you as naughty as them?I don't recall MQ saying wasn't an alliance.
-
Aiding the enemy could be one.
The real reason though is that FARK never liked MK and seized a cowardly opportunity.
-
The content is not what got MQ destroyed. It was their irresponsible actions, and perhaps a little hubris. How could one not expect this kind of response after making so many enemies? Nothing could save the shrooms from themselves when they attacked a neutral despite being politically isolated. The exact same thing would happen to TOP, NPO, or anyone else if they did the same after making enemies. When you play the game of thrones, you either win or you die.
Everyone dies eventually. We chose to die on our own terms after winning longer than anyone ever has or ever will.
-
Speaking of disbanding...when do you guys think the members of MK will actually realize it's Disbanded...The alliance still has a NS of over 2 Million and over 600 nukes....
Most of the alliances left aren't worthy of having a Shroom in their ranks: I believe that's why they aren't changing AAs. Why do you care?
-
Fine, I'll take that 100 tech. No need to thank me, guys.
-
There aren't really that many hoops to jump through people so calm down. If a nation wants peace he just needs to talk to the nations he's at war with. Just yesterday I discovered that one nation who wants to join goons wanted peace. But the nations he was at war with were unaware of this. It wasn't until marx approached a member of NATO and threatened him to peace out or else.... If you get all your wars peaced out and you join an alliance then you are safe... I won't even ask for reps.
But the rogues need to take some initiative, which isn't difficult considering the mass attack they orchestrated on TDO, and ask for peace.
You guys (and by that I mean all the people at war with MQ) need to get your act together though. TDO (the offended party) doesn't want reps and apparently neither do you. But, suddenly, IRON does. NATO suddenly threatens MQ nations with perma-war... I mean, I don't personnally care but you can't come here and say it's easy for MQ nations to get peace when it isn't.
-
I'm not going to reexplain to you why you are wrong. Many have tried and you're still going "durr hurr luk @ mee im fightin". You're wrong, plain and simple. Whether you chose to face the facts is irrelevant. You are wrong.
-
Oh mister potato. Potato head of Mac Land. Do not be rude to Mr Tywin Lannister. He victorious in killing many of you fellow Mush people in comparison to you nation which seems to be dying soon to be most dead indeed unless God or Ubuntu takes pity on you and speaks in your behalf. His nation rising. Yours in steep decline 28 infrastructure zero soldiers Anarchy. I think maybe you nation is the one not relevant.
I still have 28 infra? What is taking so long? I haven't checked my nation in nearly a week. But, please, don't say a word: I don't want to be affiliated to any of you drooling retards.
Perma ZI allowed back in CN ?
in World Affairs (IC)
Posted
Fait enough. But you don't seem to be doing much to help my good friends get off, thus enabling FARK/TTE/RnR/-insert useless alliance here- to enforce PZI. You don't have to do anything but, as someone said, your actions speak louder than your words.
So, what you're saying is that, when give the chance, you're no better than us? I thought that was the whole point of this.