Jump to content

nutkase

Members
  • Posts

    1,392
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by nutkase

  1. [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1328951962' post='2918229']
    Not if I am Ephor of Lykoi. There will be no peace mode without a clear strategy to leave it.

    I love how the guy from the alliance who was too afraid to fully withdraw for fear of losing their sanction is cheering your thing on though, Alterego. And our good old friend from the Last Remnants who has a de facto MDP with said alliance decided to chime in. Very nice. So no, there will be no NPO mode.

    BAPS, NPO, and TLR are free to back up their talk whenever they wish.
    [/quote]

    I would stop considering Sparta's very recent history.

  2. [quote name='Steve Buscemi' timestamp='1328947033' post='2918208']
    All I see here is that Gramlins still have their fair share of moralist pricks. Good to know. Enderland, weren't you quite the raider back in the day?
    [/quote]

    I don't remember him raiding alliances though, also you seem a bit upset that there is still people with morals.

    I can offer you a tissue, maybe a whole box.

  3. [quote name='janax' timestamp='1327330098' post='2905490']
    "Only" is a strong term. GPF in general has been nothing like the accusations made here and elsewhere to us.

    They've been easy to work with, in constant communication and very friendly. While a treaty may be faster than our normal vetting process to formalize the protection of our tech, it's not the only reason by any means. It just is speeding up our normal process

    As to who we protect, if any of the rest of those alliances named had no protection suddenly, and we had a mass grouping of deals with them as well as friendly relations, it would be considered.
    [/quote]

    Give me some of those sellers and I'll let the treaty pass :awesome:

  4. [quote name='Krack' timestamp='1326585574' post='2899751']
    Is this your personal opinion, or are you speaking in your unofficial capacity of "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" Minister for TOP?

    [b]EDIT:[/b] Unrelated side question to the Gramlins membership: The next time your leadership has to choose between the best interests of the Gramlins' membership, or the best interests of their BFF in TOP, are you gonna be surprised when they bail on you again?
    [/quote]

    Wow, you really have no idea do you?

  5. [quote name='Ad Fidem' timestamp='1324191148' post='2881037']
    I know you're tryning to be funny but your sarcasm is only half right. although they lined up an shot at each other it was mainly the Brits that used that tactic, and afterwards both sides didn't share tea and crumpets... they did however allow each other to recover and bury thier dead.


    on another note... looks like a great CB to roll them at a later date, or why not nuke them now its better to go down nuking instead of beieng upset about the taste of the nuke u just ate..
    [/quote]

    The truth is not needed in effective Sarcasm.

  6. [quote name='Mesteut' timestamp='1323830747' post='2877163']
    Oh, right. No exposure to oriental culture. Or any culture. My mistake.

    Witty merchant - merchant who tries to almost con people out of their money through a series of clever tricks and wordplay (except a witty merchant makes a good job). You have agreed to terms, withdrew terms, played around and haggled them to no end while going back and forth on your words. I'll say unsuccessful witty merchant, because a witty merchant actually sells their product to the one they're originally trying to sell. Failing at haggling by testing CSN's patience, you just decided to go through the PR route, on which people who already didn't like SF jumped.

    What is admitted is that war with DT was coming. Not that the current conditions are deserved.

    I am making sure it is heard enough that your self righteousness is !@#$%^&*.
    This is a funny word from someone who "went Dark Taliban", by the way.
    [/quote]


    Sorry but your use of Witty Merchant was terribly wrong.

  7. [quote name='TheDoctor' timestamp='1323649484' post='2874409']
    Fair enough. Thank you for your time, I know you could have just as easily ignored it or went with the ever popular "lols stfu deal with it" type response and it speaks well to your character that you didn't.
    [/quote]

    The issue is this (--) big.

    The issue you think is how big (-------------)

    Better of finding a better topic to keep your interest.

  8. [quote name='Quiziotle' timestamp='1323233647' post='2866815']
    I used to be an obnoxious and impotent sociopath like you. Then I took an arrow in the knee.
    [/quote]

    Ahaha, surely I was not the only one to get this?


    [quote name='Jaiar' timestamp='1323234492' post='2866861']
    Asgaard and Basketball Ninjas...

    In other words, Ragnarok is avoiding getting hit by VE.

    Rok, you might get what you want if CSN or R&R are the counters for this DoW, but you're cowards.

    Bob Ilyani needs to shut up now and shove that stupid sig somewhere. You talk too much and you send others to do your job for you.

    Rok is afraid of VE.
    [/quote]

    Seriously, stop posting!

    Awww BN how much I envy you! :(


    o/ BN
    o/ PF

×
×
  • Create New...