nutkase
-
Posts
1,392 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by nutkase
-
-
Depends if you value the words of the person saying it I suppose :)
Touche, I give you that point :P.T
Though while it may not hold value with you. It may with your peers, the ones you actually might value.
Like they say, everything you do and say has a ripple effect.
-
That's weird, how come I had to just peace out a war if I was in PM for the whole war?
Yes, because 1 nation makes up the main mass of GATO, stop playing the fool.
-
It certainly appears to be a good tactic for upsetting RnR members.
But is it worth being called cowards in return?
(Talking about GATO, not you personally)
-
EgoFreaky - you claim GATO used bad tactics, yet here you are posting several hundred words of upset about them.
You say that like staying in PM the whole war is a actual tactic.
-
I'll talk to my guys.
Also, I ordered 140 to peace and 40 out there abouts. I guess we can throw the 4 that didn't make it to peace. Newyy, xkirra, ebagger, and I think 1 more.....in on those who didn't follow orders since they didn't get to pm and the 5 ordered out that didn't So I'll give you that 9 didn't follow orders out of the whole alliance. Is that really that bad? 1/20....5%......C'mon that is pretty good. To be fair I likely would have had to wear out my fingers typing angry messages if I had tried to bring out other tiers in force. After a few months in PM most probably gave up checking in everyday etc.
When GATO took over on RnR as the chief guys upstairs you had 17 over 80K and 26 over 60k. by the end you had no nations over 80k in war mode and 1 over 60k.... C'mon man that's a rout. Your side should have had us beat under 100k at least......Especially since at the same time we were fighting Legion who had nearly as many as you did in those ranges...... Nevermind what we hit in Invicta, GOD, and DB4D, and Fark. Which combined might have had that many. You guys drug 4 guys down I think and held them down. but when you consider we wrecked dozens of nations....some who wont recover......it was a pretty bad beat for all of you combined. RnR was the best built and will have the easiest time recovering. I kinda feel bad for Legion though.
When you bring out your entire alliance and beat RnR, you can call it a rout.
-
I'm so glad you are the one that defines what is an isn't an alliance. Just like those discussions when people would argue whether or not an alliance exists because it has less the a certain number of members, but I'm glad you are here to set them all straight on what is and isn't.
GOONS have been doing this for years.
-
Throwing missiles and commanding soldiers to their death take roughly ten minutes of my daily schedule. I need something else.
@Otter: I take it that you do not dispute the other 13 points?
I'm happy to see that we have finally agreed on the timetable of events.
I'm not even getting that at the moment :(
-
We founded PF with a given set of treaties. During the existence of PF, we were often told that we needed to work hard on mending relations with Umbrella. Which we did. Our other treaties never changed.
Tell me, again, who changed course?What was the major issue at the founding of PF and nearly did not see it come about? what was the main and often constant issue within PF?
The whole point of PF was to change course and make it ours, not enable TOP's allies to think of us as a extension of you.
But you were happy with that thought, and that was the killing blow for PF.
-
Yet, for all your nonsensical ramblings about how evil we are, you can't pin a single crime against us. We've tried to get answers from others too. Hey Argent, what's up with you holding a grudge? A grudge over what? And TORN, wanting to see us under a jackboot? When did we last talk? BiPolar?
Maybe something with claiming holding PF above any other treaty when really you were not. Now you can stand there and claim anything in the sky but you and me both know which side you were backing and which side you were trying to save face with.
-
Trade sanction, really? You just moved my efforts from your side in general to now just you.
The difference being we went to AI and they said nutkase was a ghost. The people on our side claim their members and if you want to go to war with them over it....that is your right. If he wanted to hit us so bad he should have sat on an AA we were actually at war with.
How about now?
-
GATO never takes reps regardless of the outcome of wars. That is why we tend not to have major issues with alliances on either side. The only alliances that tend to give GATO a hard time are the ones we aren't at war with.
Except "rogues"?
-
I will. Once I'm ordered to. :smug:
If ever ordered
-
You've spied 100% of our nations. Scary.
Come out of PM, I have a gift for you :awesome:
-
Excellent. Everybody wins then.
GATO lower tier won't be
-
Eventually we will and eventually the wider war will end but our war with you will not.
You have no idea how happy I am now.
-
Ahh nutkase...you nutcase.
http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=197780
You're not in AI....so you are now a rogue and will not receive peace from us at the conclusion of the wider war. This post for posterity in case someone tries to accept you after this thing.
What you going to do, counter me? Usually have to exit PM for that
-
maybe somebody in FARK will declare on me?
Probably not but im trying my best to lose all my infra to open myself to more of you guys! So far no one in DB4D, Legion, RnR, FARK, GOD, and Invicta and anyone else out there has decided to hit me....
Cmon FARK prove me wrong?
Probably wont but Ive found some nice targets from FARK
See you in a couple days
A lot of us on the other side can say the same. Your situation is not unique to just your side ;-) -
Cute. How else would you describe it other then a dog pile? I'm just poking fun at the sheer amount of dogs your willing to sacrifice in an attempt to take down an elephant. Some of these nations just won't be able to rebuild. Wouldn't it be better, for your sake to try to plan for the next attempted take down?
Weird considering DH do the same tactic, so either you apply double standards or ignore what is going on within DH.
Why try to take you down later when we are quite happy to do it now? I unfortunately am not a patient person. -
Hey, whatever makes you sleep at night. Soon your be to paranoid that an Umbrella nation will hit you that you won't be able to rest. Enjoy your sleep while you can, soon you won't be able to.
You read my post correct. How many nations does it take to bring us down? How many alliances? That wasn't a pm joke, that was a man up and get them casualties post. But, your side isn't exactly known for fair fights ;-) I'm not saying that you will win, just laughing at your inability to handle 1 on 1 combat.
I suppose I'm use to logging and see that plank as less of an issue then saw dust in the eye. Saw dust is the eye can be blinding and make you lose sight of your surroundings while the plank will leave a mere bruise. If I were you, I would be more worried about what tomorrow may bring, or is that why your leadership decided to add another shit alliance on top of the pile of shit alliances to try to combat a Gato entrance to the DH/DR front? Desperate times have arrived my friend, desperate times indeed.
Are you seriously calling us out for not having a "fair fight"?
Gareths quote is ringing more true every time you post!
-
Im not in peace mode and im in gato...anyone is welcome to come knocking at my door
Sell down to 40K and I will :D
-
You see my point. 15-18k tech nations would easily reach down to 80k and even a shade lower. My point was that a 20k tech nuke turret could reach down to 80k NS..so 80k is not at all safe. Also, this strategy is not ours alone.
Though could be countered with a half decent WC and ongoing tech deals.
I believe this strategy will not win the war, to be honest I don't think any real strategy will. I see it as whoever loses interest in attacking every day will be the ones to succumb first.
EDIT: Crappy wording
-
Well yeah at a certain point we won't have enough nations for another pass at the top of whatever you have left. Where is that point and will the alliances over there be fine with being ground down that far? The 80k mark I saw someone from your side say is a laughable mark. a 20k tech nation can hit that low after zi and zl. 60K? We've already beaten alliances below that......I think its closer to 40k before we start having real trouble but even then a lot of those nations will be wiped out as well. That will be the point this war is decided....many many months from now or you can save all of yourselves the pain and tap out now.
GATO actually need to have 20K tech nations first.
-
Oh it wasn't my intent to question your intelligence (don't let the sarcasm fool you). I was just seeking to refute your assertion that Chax is a hypocrite here given the circumstances.
Lets suppose though that that was my intent; how does that reinforce your claim? (Or is that not what you meant?)
I talking about Chax, not yourself in questioning my intelligence.
-
Wonderful! We agree. Ergo, not hypocrisy. That word gets thrown around far, far too often round these parts.
You do relies by retorting my post by questioning my intelligence just concretes the claim.
This Week in GATO
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
Don't make up stuff?
Are you seriously that thick? GATO middle tier and lower tier never made it out of PM. The entire war I was able to only engage 4 GATO nations within my range with none of them actual declarations on me and I believe 3 of them being top tiers who were dragged down to my range.
I was only able to engage the 4th in the last 2 days after I stopped checking my nation for a week because of no open targets, and you know the funny thing Dre4mwe4ver fought better in those 2 days then the other 3 combined.
So don't try to enhance GATO's crappy performance, I was one of the other people sitting around waiting for you guys to show up while ninja danced around saying you would.