bart416

It's funny how you don't seem to understand the difference between a war and intentionally targeting small nations. The funny thing is that you completely misjudge our tactics, your small beginner friends aren't of much interest to us in alliance wars. Where do you get the idea that NPO members are DeathAdder's lackeys and pawns? Now I'm rather curious about this one. Of course you have this entire mental construction about how NPO is run in your head, so humour me and share your exact thought process on this matter. Well knowing that I completely disagree with DeathAdder, if it had been up to me we would have been nuking you into oblivion for the past three years for your disrespectful and immature behaviour back then. Lets see how the next rounds of your war proceed, as the number of nuclear weapons you have available drops to those you can buy each day and you start running into nations with an SDI.

Of course, it's our bourgeoisie way!

On that one I'll go with "treaty bound". Yes, "death to the hippies" is a good approach to life, and NPO Military Command stands firmly with that. We also condone the use of nuclear weapons to wage war on wool socks, they generate way too much static charge. You were forced into a corner by your own actions. I heard that bills are very low at zero infrastructure, so technically we are helping you! We'llhave to agree to disagree. Alternatively you could have shut up originally, and none of this would have happened. 😆

We pass the senate proposals that are optimal for the majority of our team. We do the math everytime, and I'm fairly certain we're more qualified than you to do such calculations. Neutrals had it coming. (e.g. Willingly harbouring a wartime deserter after multiple warnings, directly aiding enemies, etc.) You can't proclaim neutrality, screw up intentionally on a continuous basis, and then hide behind your declaration of neutrality. Ain't how it works in real life, ain't how it works here. Messengers state facts, not opinions like you've been doing. Your posts are on par with a column section in a crappy newspaper where the writer doesn't get paid. Dissent would imply we ever accepted you among us in the first place, we really didn't. You're more like the town lunatic that went too far. And we're still waiting for that apology, and we're expecting one paragraph of at least 100 words per post you made in this thread.

You weren't nice, also if you can only keep your composure when everything goes well, then you're useless as a leadership figure. There's a reason we say "grace under pressure" and not "deranged lunatic under pressure". Then be prepared to deal with other people their free expressions, which clearly ain't the case. Our motivations are pretty clear, we want you to shut up or stop nagging us. However, you never apologised, nor have you apologized for recent actions. Arrogance, funny you should say that. Mirror, mirror on the wall, who's the most arrogant of them all. Anyway, you're never getting peace, half of CN wants a shot at you. Surprisingly, a lot of those alliaces aren't allied to us, seems the only thing we agree upon is blowing you up. So you got to start asking yourself how this happened.

So knowing who we're talking about, never...

That's been tried, and it failed spectacularly I might add.

More casualties for the national cemetery wonders, thank you!

Yes, which are actions based on your initial transgressions. And quite a valid response from our end all things considered, it's a small miracle it took this long for you to end up on one of our target lists given what you've said about us in the past. And everything you've done since isn't helping your case along. Whenever I see you post something I have to clear my desk so I don't get a ballpoint pen imprint on my head when I have to facedesk because of the cyclic arguments and 180° spins I see you make. Sorry DeathAdder, but I have to disagree with you on this one, honestly: "turn you"? You deserve some credit, but it must have been pretty bad beforehand to achieve this end result.

Nah, preferably you'd stop nagging us and we'd forget about you once more.

Again you fail to comprehend fine nuances. I didn't say he was joking, I said we can't really be bothered to nag you to leave hippy mode, we don't quite care enough about you to do so.

Not really, we honestly don't care enough about you to actively invest effort into engaging you until you annoy us, which you have... We normally don't bother with wall stains.

May I point out, you're the one who attacked us...

You know some large nations generate that much cash a day. So basically you've set us back 3 days of individual nation collections if we consider the alliance as a whole, worst case scenario 6, maybe... So congratulations are in order! Means someone will be able to buy +/-5 tanks less whenever a war eventually does come around.

Oh gosh, you did minor cosmetic damage to three nations, how will we ever come over this grievous attack!

As requested: (OOC: https://www.etsy.com/listing/97414187/beehive-dragon-spork-and-spoon-set-baby if you want them ) Deliberate strategy 🤣 You know, we could actually keep you in anarchy permanently and not let you fight a single NPO nation, ever...

Don't let the bouncy belly flop you through the window if you push too hard

You do realise that from now on your attacks will do a lot less damage right? Or did you forget about the concept of infra jumps?

So you need potty training?

I'm not changing your diapers!

11. Mealstrom Vortex's ego is big enough to eat the entirety of planet bob in one bite.

9. Nuke first, don't bother to ask questions later.

7. A penny saved is a penny counted by Frawley's coin polishers.

4. Fear the poodle.