Jump to content

abaddonis

Members
  • Posts

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About abaddonis

  • Birthday 09/27/1984

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    CTU-LA
  • Alliance Name
    New Pacific Order
  • Resource 1
    Coal
  • Resource 2
    Gems

abaddonis's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. I recently switched alliances. For the 20 minutes my AA was set to "none" i got several recruiting PMs.
  2. I find it hard to define "defeat" as losing pocket change on the battlefield. Defeats should be based on casualties, not what random money/equipment is left on the war path
  3. They'll come when you least expect it In other words: Whenever admin feels like adding them
  4. I'd like to know what you do to support your own cause.
  5. 34,159.788 233 days I'm not militarily built up completely
  6. I want to prevent spying on my nation and so do you. I spy on you twice and each time I do "Intel report" where I see your trade partners, etc... No more spying cna be done on you. If you do the same to me, we've basically filled our spy-slots. Perhaps this could be fixed by preventing a 2nd spy mission on the same nation if the first is successful
  7. Will there be penalties for abusing the spy system? If you can only be hit twice per day, alliances can just spy on their own members (albeit at a large cost) to prevent others from seeing inside. It's the equivalent of war-slot filling for spying Edit: Looks good!
  8. I'd imagine you eat the cost if they fail and they instantaneously return, much like how deployed soldiers return after a nuke
  9. That is a great way to implement it. Will it tell what kind of spying took place?
  10. People will find a way to screw the system. If admin prevents inter-alliance spying, alliances will outsource it to other alliances
  11. It's unrealistic to have soldiers carrying money into battle (you lose money when you lose battles). It's unrealistic to have an entire army refuse to fight and destroy an enemy's nation because they have no soldiers. If we're not going for realism (which I think we can all agree that realism and CN don't mix) what is stopping us from letting one person change people's desires? It's an interesting new feature that will add another side to game play. Why quibble over small semantics?
  12. Does the name Martin Luther ring a bell? One man CAN spark a swing in desired religion.
  13. Admin: I'm noticing a trend of posts here. Perhaps you could add something to let people know that spies can't change your religion or government, rather they change your desired religion or government. Hopefully that would cut down the posts that keep saying "They shouldn't be able to change you religion. How can they do that?, etc..." Edit: I did HTML tags and not bbcode
  14. You set your own threat level
×
×
  • Create New...