Jump to content
  • entries
    18
  • comments
    64
  • views
    7,925

Disbandment: It's bad for business


crushtania

226 views

Some in the community have been out for Pacifican blood for a very long time now - I can see the pain they have caused to a significant proportion of Planet Bob and I can sympathize with their want for revenge; but calls for disbandment of a (formerly) sanctioned alliance will fall flat due to one simple fact: money.

If any of you have seen the NPO forums, they are well designed and use a full version of IPB. They also run a radio station and own a domain name. Domain registration may only cost US$10 or for a year for a TLD, significantly more for a 2LD. Back in TAB, the CIS generously hosted our 2nd forums with a full version of IPB Boards on their server (Thanks Quicksilver!) - once we heard that the IPB licence was due to expire, we had to find a new home - we used freeware boards (phpbb) and Commander John, a TABbie who runs several web projects and businesses gave us some room on some of his servers. Using up bandwidth for a radio station was out of the question.

I can only imagine that NPO with the traffic they attract to their forums; the running of their Radio Free Pacifica and their maintenance of a full version of IPB, domain registration and other costs means that the leadership sink a lot of their actual money into keeping "NPO" afloat. If they were made to disband, money already spent goes unused. Once a licence or a domain has been purchased, one must wait for it to expire - there are no refunds to be had.

Whether Pacifica deserve to be dissolved by the Karma forces or not is up for continued debate. But if I were being told to disband after I had set up cheap Invision Free forum that can be left to gather spambots and eventual deletion, I'd probably do so to save the NS of my comrades. But if I had spent my actual money on the venture, you'd probably get a vehement "GTFO."

4 Comments


Recommended Comments

Nobody can make NPO disband, so they probably wont. However, there are hundreds of people who don't pay a cent to be in NPO, so they will be less inclined to stay after a few months of peace mode. After a year or two, I'd be willing to wager that NPO will be down to about 200 core members.

Link to comment
This is kind of contrary to your other, What the People Want, They Get, post innit?

Not particularly; alliance members should be given a voice in terms of whether the alliance demands reps or not. Disbandment, to me, seems like a fate that should never be forced upon any alliance.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...