Chad Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 (edited) CT Mk.I "Jegyer" The CT Mk.I "Jegyer" is a new Crimean tank developed by Element Technologies. The Jegyer will replace all existing PT-91 MBTs currently in service with the Crimean Army. Weight: 50 tonsLength: 11m with barrel Width: 4m Height: 2.5m Crew: 3 Armor: Composite Primary Armament: 1x 145mm cannon Secondary Armament: 1x 7.62 coaxial MG, 1x 7.62 AA MG Engine: ETE-2000 (2000hp) Range: 700km Speed: 60km/h Orders are now being taken. The Crimean government has the right to deny a country delivery of the Jegyer for whatever reason. Edited April 6, 2009 by Isotope Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 Molakia wishes to Purchase 50 of These tanks to replace our aging T72 MBTs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris of Khi Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 These are inferior to Delta Omega's suplly of 2*10^10 Super-laser-tanks...WITH ROCKET ENGINES! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 We wonder about the practicality of placing a 145mm cannon in such a low profile turrent. Unless of course, it is a remote targeted and operated turret, in which case it is a very practical solution, one with have adopted with the twin 135mm cannon on our MBT-01. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris of Khi Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 (edited) We only use the finest votex-induced generators which propel our Laser-Turrets. They look like this -------------------------------------------------| |-------------------------------------------|=====================================================TPF -------------------------------------------------| .../..............\ ../................\ ./..................\ Edited April 6, 2009 by Chris of Khi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 A tank really does not need two cannons. Sure it increases ROF but doesnt it increase general wear and tear on the turrent as a whole? What about replacement parts, you need double per tank! Finally, alot of ammo would be shot out, i cant imagine the cost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadowsage Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 If the statistics provided are correct, the MBT for Crimea Iso is single-barreled? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uberstein Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 A tank really does not need two cannons. Sure it increases ROF but doesnt it increase general wear and tear on the turrent as a whole? What about replacement parts, you need double per tank! Finally, alot of ammo would be shot out, i cant imagine the cost. Two cannons, if fired at the same time, would also cause double the recoil. Both cannons would also be off center, reducing accuracy. That is why Mariehamm Arms has never designed a 2 barreled MBT. Multi-barrel is better for AA and SPRA applications. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 If you fire one shot, let the tank stop moving, then fire the second, i can see using the 2 Barrel Design. But the wear and tear on the parts isnt cost effective. Why replace two barrels that give slightly better ROF when you can replace one? Back to buisness, Molakia is hoping to see a demonstration of this tanks power vs other tanks. We have several T72s lying around for target practice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 If you have looked at the armour of high tech tanks these days you will realise that a two shots is a very good idea if you actually want to kill the other tank with high amount of certainty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uberstein Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 If you have looked at the armour of high tech tanks these days you will realise that a two shots is a very good idea if you actually want to kill the other tank with high amount of certainty. You can get the same rate of fire with higher accuracy and less cost with a automatic reloader. We currently hold the patent for the world's fastest design used in the Vessla. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markus Wilding Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 We would like 100 of these to replace the Sherman M1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted April 7, 2009 Report Share Posted April 7, 2009 You can get the same rate of fire with higher accuracy and less cost with a automatic reloader. We currently hold the patent for the world's fastest design used in the Vessla. We seriously doubt that. Our low profile turret and the large size of the guns used in the MBT-01 required an autoloader, and with the computer controlled targeting system we are quite confidant that we have faster reloading and more accurate guns than you do. However, they may cost more. We are not worried. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uberstein Posted April 7, 2009 Report Share Posted April 7, 2009 We seriously doubt that. Our low profile turret and the large size of the guns used in the MBT-01 required an autoloader, and with the computer controlled targeting system we are quite confidant that we have faster reloading and more accurate guns than you do. However, they may cost more. We are not worried. OOC: I take it your engineers are delusional. Twin guns is an incredibly silly idea for tanks. There is a reason nobody does it. IC: The Vessla Orm had a rate for it's 120mm gun of 20 rounds per minute using a recoil-operated mechanism. Your continued delusional propaganda is getting annoying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chad Posted April 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 7, 2009 The tank is single barreled. It comes with the CBMS-1 battlefield management system which includes a battlemap in every tank. The battlemap shows the position of known enemies, allies, or whatever targets/objectives that are inputed. The CBMS-1 is able to put the tank into an auto-aim mode of operation. The target is selected by the tank commander and the turrest and barrel are move to automatically aim at the target and hold it until the target is destroyed and/or removed. Although field tests have yet to be conducted, it is hoped that the CBMS-1 will be able to hold aim even when the tank is moving at speeds over rough terrain. All orders have been processed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted April 7, 2009 Report Share Posted April 7, 2009 (edited) OOC: I take it your engineers are delusional. Twin guns is an incredibly silly idea for tanks. There is a reason nobody does it.IC: The Vessla Orm had a rate for it's 120mm gun of 20 rounds per minute using a recoil-operated mechanism. Your continued delusional propaganda is getting annoying. IC: Please try resending that transmission with the right set of punch cards. Delusional propaganda? Our rate of fire is in excess of 40 rounds a minute, and we would be please to demonstrate it. OOC: Based on this. Yes its a naval gun, but its twin barreled and has an auto loader and can get 40 rounds a min per gun, and is 130mm, only 5mm smaller than my tanks gun. EDIT: Made by russians in the early eighties too! Edited April 7, 2009 by LeVentNoir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uberstein Posted April 7, 2009 Report Share Posted April 7, 2009 IC: Please try resending that transmission with the right set of punch cards. Delusional propaganda? Our rate of fire is in excess of 40 rounds a minute, and we would be please to demonstrate it.OOC: Based on this. Yes its a naval gun, but its twin barreled and has an auto loader and can get 40 rounds a min per gun, and is 130mm, only 5mm smaller than my tanks gun. EDIT: Made by russians in the early eighties too! OOC: And the fact that it's a naval gun is a HUGE hint. Notice the size of the ammo storage, the size of the gun, and imagine how large your tank would need to be. Then, think about bridges, tanks need to cross bridges and terrain. Do you have a picture of this tank? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted April 7, 2009 Report Share Posted April 7, 2009 OOC: And the fact that it's a naval gun is a HUGE hint. Notice the size of the ammo storage, the size of the gun, and imagine how large your tank would need to be. Then, think about bridges, tanks need to cross bridges and terrain. Do you have a picture of this tank? OOC I'm not having a ooc argument here. Meet me on IRC if you have anything to say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uberstein Posted April 7, 2009 Report Share Posted April 7, 2009 OOC I'm not having a ooc argument here. Meet me on IRC if you have anything to say. OOC: I don't have IRC. My MSN is spencer_la_france@hotmail.com, AIM is zerall51. Or I could start a seperate topic on this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted April 7, 2009 Report Share Posted April 7, 2009 OOC: I don't have IRC. My MSN is spencer_la_france@hotmail.com, AIM is zerall51. Or I could start a seperate topic on this. OOC: Pm me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uberstein Posted April 7, 2009 Report Share Posted April 7, 2009 OOC: Pm me. OOC: Done and done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.