Triyun Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 (edited) A Mutual Cooperation PactArticle I. Non-Aggression The signatories of the Eurasian Axis commit to non-aggression towards one another and the maintaining of a sustainable peace, as such they shall resolve all disputes privately. Article II. Joint Intelligence The signatories of the Eurasian Axis Commit to sharing intelligence with one another and not spying on one another. They will cooperate in all matters of intelligence for defending against foreign threats. Article III. Military Cooperation The signatories of the Eurasian Axis will agree to military cooperation of all kinds. Should the signatories come under attack they shall counter it with every means necessary. Action against one signatory shall be considered an attack against all. Article VI. Amendment and Withdrawl The signatories of the Eurasian Axis may amend the pact or admit a new member by unanimous consent. It takes 3 months (1 week IRL) to withdraw from this pact. Signed Liu Kaishui Premier and Foreign Minister of the United States of China Michael Devereaux: Michael Devereaux Imperial Regent Oligarch Administrator of Province One George Blair, Foreign Affairs Liaison to Big Brother Oceania By the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, Ireland, and Iceland and of His other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith James IX By the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, Ireland, and Iceland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith Elizabeth IV Prime Minister William Gwynedd The House of Lords The House of Commons Signed for Burma, Sr. General Minh Kong Chariman of the State Peace and Development Council Edited March 2, 2009 by Triyun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Orlov Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 (edited) The Bolshevik Federation protests the creation of an axis. This "pact" seems to be geared mainly for war, possibly a USC attempt to drag other nations into a USC conflict. Why was this not created before USC began expanding and threatening war with the non-aggressive Comintern? Also we would suggest a constructive agreement that would actually aid the signatories economically, or perhaps unify nations because there is a need for unity rather than a need for war; we would welcome such USC pact. We personally hope a more constructive treaty can replace this military axis, that we see will only become a USC led military machine against idiologically different nations and pacts. Edited February 27, 2009 by General Orlov Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 (edited) Each of our nations is fully capable of standing alone economically. Our interests are shared in the case of the military and diplomacy those are the areas we wish to pursue cooperation. Edited February 27, 2009 by iamthey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Orlov Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 Each of our nations is fully capable of standing alone economically. Our interests are shared in the case of the military and diplomacy those are the areas we wish to pursue cooperation. It is obviouse to us that this pact will quickly become currupted by USC's military ambitions. They are already in an active conflict, so naturally as soon as a nation signs they must send aid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 Those who join have the intention of participating in the actions of the Eurasian Axis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 These blocs are good. Who cares which 'ideology' wins, the result is the same, the weak crushed and killed, as it should be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 These blocs are good. Who cares which 'ideology' wins, the result is the same, the weak crushed and killed, as it should be. Well put. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Of Cheese Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 Oceania would like to join this pact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 Oceania would like to join this pact. The Imperium supports their entry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted February 27, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 As does the United States. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Of Cheese Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 Signature: George Blair, Foreign Affairs Liaison to Big Brother Oceania Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Orlov Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 These blocs are good. Who cares which 'ideology' wins, the result is the same, the weak crushed and killed, as it should be. The Bolshevik Federation does not agree with this statement. All nations, regardless of size or strength should be allowed to follow their own path of development. The strong require responsibility and obligation to lead the world on a prosperous path, jsut as the weak require guidence, friendship, and help to better contribute to the ideal goals of the strong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 The Bolshevik Federation does not agree with this statement. All nations, regardless of size or strength should be allowed to follow their own path of development. The strong require responsibility and obligation to lead the world on a prosperous path, jsut as the weak require guidence, friendship, and help to better contribute to the ideal goals of the strong. Didn't you say there is no international law or true universal rights? Your own ideology justifies truth with the force imposed by the masses of a nation, so in reality this is true. Might is always right as might defines the nature of rightness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ViraKhail Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 The Veran Government is, as of this moment, deciding to stay neutral in the creation of this pact. Truthfully, the pacts itself interests the Veran government and, likewise, the Empire's people, but the opposition to the pact by our allied brothers to the south, the Bolshevik Federation, is cause for slight alarm. The Veran Government does not wish to make enemies of allies, nor does it wish to make enemies of potential allies. The Veran Government may change it's stance either Pro or Con pact dependant on the outcome of the entity disagreement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Seb Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 Burma is interested in signing this pact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 Burma is interested in signing this pact. The Imperium would approve of their entry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Seb Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 The Imperium would approve of their entry. Burma thanks the Imperium for its vote of confidence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeVentNoir Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 The Bolshevik Federation does not agree with this statement. All nations, regardless of size or strength should be allowed to follow their own path of development. The strong require responsibility and obligation to lead the world on a prosperous path, jsut as the weak require guidence, friendship, and help to better contribute to the ideal goals of the strong. Incorrect. There is only power. The strong have it, and the weak must simply endure until they grow strong. It is the constant struggle that shows the strong and forges heats of iron. If the weak fall, it is only right, as the weak should not defeat the strong, because if that appears to happen, the weak had hidden strength, the the strong had a weak core. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 (edited) Incorrect. There is only power. The strong have it, and the weak must simply endure until they grow strong. It is the constant struggle that shows the strong and forges heats of iron.If the weak fall, it is only right, as the weak should not defeat the strong, because if that appears to happen, the weak had hidden strength, the the strong had a weak core. This actually is reflective of Imperium conceptions of the world. Such a statement can be found in our own nation's founding articles. As time has progressed humanity has itself become detached from things once thought certain. Absolutism the moral ideology of the past which dictated a set of norms that were inherently, and eternally true has given way to relativism. A system which dynamically adjusts itself, and dictates a set of norms based upon the coercive ability of certain notions of “form” to themselves be imposed upon others. Therefore it comes as no surprise that power no longer is decided by authority but rather authority is decided by power, there can be no illegitimate power without another power declaring itself legitimate and a committing the converse upon the other. Thus the only legitimate government is that which is capable of imposing itself upon its subjects. Thus the only true state is that which has the power to decide upon the norm. Edited March 1, 2009 by iamthey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mergerberger II Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 The United Kingdom seeks entry into this pact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Triyun Posted March 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 We vote yes to both. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeliscob Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 The New Agmarian Empire is interested in joining this pact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 We vote yes to both. As do we. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emperor Of Cheese Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 Oceania votes yes to all. OoC: Sorry for the delay, been busy this last week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Seb Posted March 1, 2009 Report Share Posted March 1, 2009 (edited) Signed for Burma, Sr. General Minh Kong Chariman of the State Peace and Development Council Edited March 2, 2009 by Cody Seb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.