Jump to content

Xiphosis

Members
  • Posts

    4,611
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Xiphosis

  1. You aren't making the case for anything other than he should have resigned and allowed someone else to lead NPO.  People who can't even manage the affairs of their own nation at the most basic level have absolutely no business in command.  Actually, the way you tell it, he wasn't really in command--he might have held the title, but he certainly didn't command the respect of his subordinates, who should have followed his directives, not allowed someone in another alliance to have undo influence.

     

    That said, there is plenty of blame to go around regarding what went wrong in the EQ War (on both sides really) and Brehon was by no means solely responsible.

     

    That was effectively my point. We have no argument regarding the first point.

  2. Misinformation bothers me, so I guess I'll chime in on this. From the OP:

     

    Instead, we allowed our coalition to devolve into a mess of

    miscommunication and forced through our desire to protect our friends
    over the objections of our coalition partners. After that war we
    allowed, through our tepid foreign affairs policy, our image to be
    hijacked by an ill-thought and inappropriate idea of hostility towards
    our ancient brothers.
     
    Beyond this, there seems to be a general trend here and elsewhere of putting the blame on Brehon for the mistakes made during the last war. This is false. All problems caused by NPO, when caused by them, were the result of three people primarily: Mary, Farrin, and Dilber. Mary and Farrin, as the coalition found out fairly quickly, are fairly panic-prone and they jump at shadows. Dilber knew that, and used it to try and move NPO's actions towards NSO's benefit. Inevitably, this enraged the rest of the coalition, and ultimately Brehon would have to clean it up. This happened two times that stick out in my memory, and probably to a lesser degree more times than that.
     
    We should be completely clear though: Brehon's only major crime last war was not having enough time throughout every 24 hour period to keep his piss-shy dogs on a leash. Every mistake was actually made by said dogs, the main dog now being the current Emperor of the NPO.
     
    Always convenient to blame those not really around to defend themselves anymore. You're still full of shit.
     
    Edit:
     
    Some things Brehon did last war that ruffled feathers that didn't really stand out to me, but might've really bothered others:
     
    - Pushed a "War on one is a war on all of us" policy until it meant C&G was going to get hit back hard, as they did. Then he had a fit for a minute.
     
    - Tried to take point on the coalition but then his nation deleted and he mostly didn't have time.
     
    - There was a lot of miscommunication and going over other leaders heads with regards to terms, which turned it into somewhat of a shit show. Some of this was Brehon personally, some of it was others.
  3. For the record we've been drifting apart for some time, so this really was for the best I think.  Not sure if it even warranted making a topic, lol.  Clearly GOONS want a change in their FA direction and that is their sole right.  GOONS have allies who they would prefer to ride with and I totally understand that.

     

    I wish the best of luck to you, may you continue to wreck and raid everything in your path!

     

    I'm sure they also wanted to send a message.

  4. So say you get a rogue that IS a member of a well known alliance. Perhaps they do a spy op that does very little damage...maybe destroy cms and they kill a CM or two...perhaps they do an op that does no damage at all.... Whatever... the actual damage done is only in the few thousand tops. Do you accept the cost of damage or do you shine on that and say its a waste of a slot and only take $3mil minimum? Say your on the other side do you only offer to pay damages or do you pay the $3mil so its not a waste of a slot? Are you ruthles and demand the attacker's head? Do you just chalk it up as no harm really done and move on?

     

    It depends on the context and the alliance, realistically.

  5. Interesting. Could you both work for Crymson though, or is Xiphosis the Dear Leader of the alliance I'm calling "The New Darkness?"

     

    Neither, but I could probably co-lead [as ugly as the concept is] rather easily with Grub. Grub would be wasted and would probably go insane if he had to run things by me first, and same for the other way around.
     

×
×
  • Create New...