im317
-
Posts
1,460 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by im317
-
-
[quote name='Jgoods45' timestamp='1322649276' post='2856849']
A clause they are still obligated to adhere to regardless of how the war started. At least they understand how a "mandatory" clause works and they adhere to it in a timely fashion.
[/quote]
if we follow this line of argument then i get to point out that WAPA is not in Aztec, meaning there entering into the war was via an oA. now its your turn. -
Monistica is indeed from RIA, good luck with him as his last tech deal was in very early October.
-
[quote name='Ninja Colt' timestamp='1322457541' post='2854280']
[img]http://i.imgur.com/f18Ki.png[/img]
[/quote]
how did you get a hold of one? they were supposed to be for the signatory's only. dont tell me someone put theres up on ebay. -
Grämlins had a nation join as part of that tech gain right? right?!?
-
i wanted this for a long time, so i guess in a way i have to thank you guys for attacking people
-
let the haters chores begin
-
loving this, my allies shacking up again. also Liz us and CRAP have infected you with the redundant treaty syndrome.
-
looking into stats from the 8th. check your inbox gopher
-
its not easy getting 200 members you know.
-
congrats to my good friends in The International.
-
[quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1320455881' post='2839114']
Does it really matter if NSO says "we surrender" or not. We all know they lose. They lost Bi-Polar and still claim a strategic victory. They lost 6mil dollar war and still claim a strategic victory. They lost the last war, and according to Krunk (I haven't heard many other Sith mention it) claimed a strategic victory. Do you really think if NSO said "we surrender" they'd admit to a loss?
[/quote]
this is why you make they say "we surrender. no tack backs/backsies" silly -
[quote name='Unknown Smurf' timestamp='1319410843' post='2831154']
For clarification purposes RIAs treaty is an ODP, right?
[/quote]
with SOS? yes -
congratulations to my allies in finding each other.
-
[quote name='Gibsonator21' timestamp='1318903114' post='2827493']
Something like 10.10.10. Maybe?
[/quote]
i swear if someone does something like that again... either dont do anything or do something BIG -
gopher i think its time for a change to the name of the war. you cant still be short on cash from buying your WRC.
edit: also new war to add, please keep it separate as the 2 have nothing to do with each other. -
congrats to both my allies on finding each other again
-
ridiculous, i call it wonderful.
-
this was a long time coming but we finally made it.
and i got the war warning added, check history it is valid. -
gopher you forgot to move NG to Maroon.
-
welcome to Maroon folks. happy to see new life added to the sphere.
-
RIA had a largeish member delete due to inactivity eliminating our recent gains
-
[quote name='Gopherbashi' timestamp='1317178855' post='2810042']
MK and NG have more nations on maroon than any other colour; TLR is currently stradling aqua and maroon in roughly equal amounts.
[/quote]
may as well take a look at NSO -
only 3 alliances in the red today very impressive, and only 7 lost members. we also had a net gain in members among sanction race alliances.
-
[quote name='King Wally' timestamp='1316568666' post='2804954']
Ahhhh no.
[/quote]
same for us. also the coalition clause was something delta came up with last year actually, MCDP mutual coalition defense pact.
An annoucment from USN
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted · Edited by im317
glad to finally see this get posted. also i dont understand all the odd talk that spawns from the 'LoL'
to clarify, this was completed before the 21st.