Sandwich Controversy
-
Posts
2,926 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Sandwich Controversy
-
-
I don't mean to be a cynic but you shouldn't take up projects you have no intention of sticking with.
-
[quote name='MrMuz' timestamp='1314384992' post='2788843']
Very nice analysis, but maybe do another one without the averages? I think some sanctioned alliances (especially MHA) are crippled here by all the ghosts they get. NG and TLR are doing well, but once random new nations start ghosting them, I think their rating might drop too. Warchest speculation aside, I believe MHA is quite capable of going one on one with some of the 'higher' rated alliances like GOD and BN.
The only way you could do this better is if you could try with things like top tier, upper mid tier, lower mid tier, warchests. I wonder if it's possible to estimate warchest from nation age, infra level, defending casualties, and trade ring.
[/quote]
Hahaha, I sure hope MHA, a 600 man alliance, could take on the Basketball Ninjas. -
This is an awful idea because losers will come in here and declare protection over the whole list.
-
[quote name='sir pwnage' timestamp='1314153017' post='2787385']
None of these stats are relevant. Here are the top 20 alliances ranked on the only important factors.
Total cruise missiles:
WTF: 4289
MHA: 1817
TDO: 1517
GPA: 1108
TLR: 1022
Sparta: 965
Fark: 890
Non Grata: 835
IRON: 801
GATO: 713
TOP: 641
VE: 589
NPO: 524
Umbrella: 467
The Legion: 406
ODN: 340
NpO: 332
NEW: 302
R&R: 278
MK: 32
Cruise missiles/member:
WTF (24.509/member)
TDO (11.492/member)
Umbrella (5.022/member)
TLR (4.985/member)
GPA (4.969/member)
TOP (4.820/member)
MHA (3.221/member)
Fark (3.134/member)
Non Grata (3.070/member)
Sparta (2.797/member)
GATO (2.528/member)
VE (2.485/member)
IRON (2.023/member)
NEW (1.819/member)
NPO (1.248/member)
ODN (1.185/member)
The Legion (1.728/member)
R&R (1.168/member)
NpO (1.149/member)
MK (.227/member)
All hail WTF o/
[/quote]
Your data clearly shows that MK is the best alliance, I don't know what you're on about. -
Congrats to my friends and allies in Invicta and SOS Brigade! I know this is an old friendship so I am proud to see you get this done.
-
[quote name='Zoomzoomzoom' timestamp='1313642363' post='2783393']
UPN is officially under the protection of Non Grata.
Choose wisely.
[/quote]
ball is in ur court fear..... -
[quote name='Ernesto Che Guevara' timestamp='1313641505' post='2783354']
Well UPN has these things called "Treaties", and sometimes they bring in other groups of nations known as "alliances".
loljk, we all just want a good UPN stomping.
[/quote]
So make it happen. Their allies are jokes too. -
This announcement is dumb and FEAR is a dumb alliance. Threatening UPN, Are you serious? Who are you impressing here?
Edit: and l-m-b-o at doing it with your bloc backing you up, it's !@#$@#$ UPN hahahaha -
If you were a protectorate for three years, you have some serious thinking to do about the value of your alliance.
(your STRONG TIGHT-KNIT COMMUNITY of three people doesn't count) -
Thank you for taking minutes out of your day to collect these links for us!
-
[quote name='JoshuaR' timestamp='1313302921' post='2780371']
Would be a better joke if it were logical, well executed, and based on some premise that actually made sense.
[/quote]
No, you see it's totally RANDOM and out of left field and thus it's hilarious. -
Glad to see that our FA team managed to trick Nordreich into doing our bidding once again
[quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1313268683' post='2779882']
Look at me, I'm playing politics Mum! It's pretty funny to see you constantly and transparently trying to paint yourself as a brilliant political strategist and military tactician, equal to anything the other side can throw at you. Repetition is the key, right?
[/quote]
He knows his !@#$. -
[quote name='Judge X' timestamp='1313213297' post='2779207']
United Equestria is under TPF's protection.
[/quote]
You have some !@#$@#$ balls to do this. -
...thanks for this.
-
[quote name='Omniscient1' timestamp='1313204752' post='2779072']
I never really liked you, but 4 years is quite the accomplishment. Congrats!
[/quote]
Yes, I echo these sentiments. Congratulations on your disbandment, 64digits. -
I look forward to reading eulogies from the other now-former members of 64digits. RIP.
-
The literal king of run-on sentences
-
[quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1313173805' post='2778702']
I wouldn't connect the current TPF gov with anything they did while in Q, there isn't a single person on that list of gov members still in the alliance, when you're in that comfortable of a political position, you tend to be able to act arrogant, I dont think any bloc will ever compare to the hegemony we had over the world during that time. I mean, for admin's sake, we attacked GPA [i]because we were bored and wanted tech/land,[/i] something like that couldn't ever happen again.
edit: and for the record, I'm not going to even attempt to defend my actions with TPF's MoFA, I supported what my leader wanted, it wasn't about "is this morally right?" it was about "what does slayer want to happen?", and I doubt I was the first nor will I be the last to follow my leaders into hell, though I do enjoy acknowledging I predicted Karma, hence my departure from TPF gov, but nobody wanted to do anything about it because people were stupid and thought treaties actually mattered, and couldn't be canceled.
[/quote]
[i]I was just following orders[/i] -
[quote name='Vol Navy' timestamp='1313126211' post='2778410']
I admire your optimism about it at least. But PB/DH has already shown they will roll an alliance they think is growing too large even if you aren't making any kind of aggressive political moves.
Right now the only upper tier that can take on an Umbrella/MK combination resides in the SF/XX sphere. Who, after two years of being closely allied to, and rolling others with MK/PB is suddenly immoral and not to be trusted?? Why SF and Fark of course, the very upper tier that could threaten them.
If your nations grow to a potentially threatening size, look out. You will find yourself on the short end of the MK/PB stick.
[/quote]
Well then luckily for you TPF is in no such danger. -
Xiphosis when will you be cancelling the [s]GOONS MDP[/s] ??? in response to this
-
[quote name='Rebel Virginia' timestamp='1313025615' post='2777096']
[color="#0000FF"]You seem quite upset about this. If I didn't know better I'd suspect that NATO has plans to support SF. I can't say I'll be sorry to see your alliance burn. I can only pray that NSO has a part in it.[/color]
[/quote]
Who would pray to fight NATO except a member of a really bad alliance? You should at least be shooting for RnR. -
This thread is full of posts that come off as whiny. I suggest you stop that, it's not convincing anyone to fight with you when the time comes.
-
Is RIA really like that in private, especially on their own forums? Do the rest of you literally find that funny?
-
[quote name='Transtar' timestamp='1312261244' post='2769837']
[i]tl;dr
Bacon: Hobo
Beer: Paranoia
Boobies: Kahiel[/i]
[/quote]
Amazing, amazing. This announcement is pure, distilled Fark.
Quick Tetris Announcement
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted
[quote name='Hereno' timestamp='1314651277' post='2790607']
Until then, the protection is completely active, and any former attackers of the NAAC affiliation will continue to be treated as rogues until an amiable peace agreement can be reached.
[/quote]
Could have worded this better. Am I a rogue, then? Is NPO? Is FAN?