Jump to content

flak attack

Members
  • Posts

    4,016
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by flak attack

  1. [quote name='wiccan high priest' timestamp='1340598711' post='2995298']
    that won't happen.... and you really looked mighty hard for someone at the lowest end of your target range.
    [/quote]
    If you weren't hiding everyone else in my range, I wouldn't have to look that hard.

    Be proud, I dropped 10 planes to hit you.

  2. Anyone that didn't see this coming doesn't quite understand how DH works. Umb bounces you down to MK (this step is optional, since most of you are too terrible to have nations Umb can fight), then MK sends you on down to GOONS. You then spend 2 months getting ground to pieces by GOONS while MK and Umb aid drop. Then you pay GOONS reps.

  3. [quote name='LeonidasRexII' timestamp='1340494962' post='2993890']
    Not too bad actually, because it looks like you guys finally picked up on our idea that PM could be used tactically.

    Now if you could somehow grasp the concept of hypocrisy, you'll be making real progress. Then again hypocrites rarely see themselves for what they are.
    [/quote]
    You didn't use peace mode tactically. Legion used it as a sign of strategic cowardice. Any success your coalition had with damage dealing was in spite of your alliance, not because of it. Ask any member of your coalition outside of your protectorates. Legion was a huge disappointment during that war for every single alliance on your side. You lost treaties after that war because of how miserably you handled yourselves.

  4. [quote name='Chaoshawk' timestamp='1340476027' post='2993709']
    When The Resistance quietly disbanded, the United Earth Directorate 2.0 hijacked the AA with its dozen or so nations left. One remaining tR member protested, but it was pretty much a one-sided merge to snatch up a dozen inactive nations for King Chill. I think only INT kept their treaty with them after that since INT was already allied/protector of The UED.
    [/quote]
    Pretty much. By the time this had happened, most of tR's active members had left, usually for GOONS

  5. [quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1340437647' post='2993432']
    either or, you can't sit there and pretend like RIA and MK aren't in similar situations right now.
    [/quote]
    Considering that MK has almost 2.5x RIA's ns and doesn't have half our ns in peace mode (MK has barely over 1/4 in peace), we really aren't. RIA has lost between 1/4 and 1/3 of your war mode ns. MK hasn't lose anything close to that.

  6. [quote name='Max Power' timestamp='1340368138' post='2992659']
    Actually thought this was going to be [i]This Week in R&R[/i] as a parody because R&R doesn't seem like the kind of alliance you'd be able to make a huge scandal about.
    [/quote]
    That would require some level of activity for it to happen.

  7. [quote name='WorldConqueror' timestamp='1340351700' post='2992566']
    Why do you think that you, as a single nation, can dictate terms to MK? It's your choice to declare war, but at the end of it you'll be facing whatever consequences our gov decides to dish out.
    [/quote]
    This. MK is not in the habit of letting rogues off when they want off.

  8. [quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1340348580' post='2992546']
    I want TWiM, I'm jelly.
    [/quote]
    Not gonna happen. It's to easy to abbreviate it by saying [url=http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?app=core&module=search&do=user_activity&search_app=&mid=977&sid=bd8511f015b344a3d6613230085033d]Mogar creeps a girl out big time[/url] and nothing else.

  9. [quote name='Starfox101' timestamp='1340321929' post='2992247']
    Do you guys have this on copy and paste?

    The MK air of superiority amazes me. CN has always been incredibly egotistical but come on. Try something else. Even this Zealed crap is more fresh.
    [/quote]
    http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=107283
    http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=107311

    19 hours. That's all that needs to be said.

  10. [quote name='Jaiar' timestamp='1340300116' post='2991957']
    I have logs, unfortunately, about the "war plan" being implemented which amounts to just sit there getting wrecked so top tier enemy nations our out of range leaving the fight to smaller tier nations where a numerical advantage supposedly exists. Attrition and nations begging their leadership to end the war...I came up with VietSuperFriends because it will be basically like VietFan only self imposed.

    You fungi are lucky no one listens to me or that the opposition is led by stat huggers and cowards. If an entire coalition were on board I would do a VietFungi and just tear you guys down for months even if it meant all coalition nations would be in peace mode and only coming out when it was there turn to fight to keep you well staggered and nuked. I wouldn't be afraid of your 70k+ nations. I would tear all MK nations down to well under 500 tech. MK crushed would be good even though it would lead to an eventual coalition defeat and the sacrifice of the coalition's top tiers. What other option is there? The current war plan sucks and building a bigger coalition to actually win a conventional war is years away if it ever happens at all.

    No risk, no reward. This no risk business gets them rolled anyway, might as well do something different and effective while you're at it.
    [/quote]
    Yep. This post shows that the SF leadership wasn't watching NPO very carefully.

  11. [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1340277211' post='2991724']
    It worked before. The tears flowed quite a bit.
    [/quote]
    There's a big difference in implementation between this and the way NPO did it. Problematically for them, they've already pretty much screwed up their chances of doing it right.

×
×
  • Create New...