Gh0s7
-
Posts
295 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Gh0s7
-
-
Give em hell, and goodluck FL
-
Best of luck! I'm sure this will be a more successful iteration or your previous home, abd I know you guys are active and engaged enough to make something really cook with the group you have. I look forward to seeing your success!
-
I'm having the same issue trading with Donnie. My nation link is:
https://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=624696
I'm not sure if it's because I play CN from my phone?
-
Welcome to (more) fun! Happy hunting
-
22 minutes ago, The Big Bad said:
Your alliance says its ok to mock you because you are full of it. So that is the only that is clear around here.
It's okay, he's free to do the same to you, given he's not a government member. So let the mutual trolling continue
-
8 minutes ago, The Big Bad said:
So, these are not your official positions just the way your alliance feels. Got it. No need for me to hammer away, he is doing that for you. He is making threats in your name. If he is liar feel free to lets us know.
I'm pretty sure he's already said that what he's posting are his own views and nit those of hersh, so I dont think I need to labor that point any further
-
3 hours ago, The Big Bad said:
So what we have learned today is Doom is pro heavy reps, driving people off of color spheres, they hate Sparta, Argent, GATO and CLAWS. And they have the worst troll since that guy Zig something. The phrase digging your own graves comes to mind.
I'm amused it has ti be said, but unless it's coming from government, it should not be taken as an official position of our alliance. And most of your statements do not, in fact, originate from our government. So you have 2 points you can drive home. Feel free to hammer away at those
-
5 minutes ago, A1ph4 0m3ga said:
Wow that is not a good look for an alliance defending you…almost half wanted to sever the tie.”offers some semblance of security” - that’s all CLAWS is to you guys? A semblance of security? If it wasn’t for CLAWS, DS would have been ground into the dirt. I’d be careful biting the hand that literally feeds you.
Lol, are we ignoring 'longest allies'? If he leaked the members chat, you'd see me and Hersh defending them every step of the way. And in the end, Hershey uktimately.makes all decisions within our alliance. We can express our opinions, but he is the one that makes any and all decisions.
It's nice to see Armen is a snake though
-
1 hour ago, dev0win said:
DS/DW have like what 2 nations over 100k now? Geese oh peets. 200k ANS alliance over here. Come up with some less obvious trolls.OG legit has 1 guy out of PM and OBR has 9 out of 26 nations out of PM. And If it was just upper tier nations outside of PM there'd be a valid argument that a strategy might be employed, but it rings true for every tier in OBR.
The ferocious blitz is nit in the least bit Intimidating. If this is all they have ti show fir the effort they probably should've just stayed uninvolved. I'm not impressed my the measure of their resolve.
-
Its generally poor form to post warchests on the OWF like that. I will also say that quite a few defensive wars continue without so much as a CM, as 2/3rds of my wars currently stand. One of them was completely fine with down declaring on a guy with 2 econ wonders and maybe 100 days old?
But there are also plenty of instances where you guys are also fighting. Just keep that in mind before throwing around disputable stats.
-
Lol, this is just kind of sad, but I expect nothing less from MHA. I'll have fun wailing on you guys
-
On 7/9/2022 at 11:30 PM, Mogar said:
Are you sure? I would take a step back and reevaluate that position.
Which DS ally might you be reffering to? I'm genuinely curious
-
6 minutes ago, Vaegir said:
The best defense is a good offense!
Maybe it's just because I'm new to these parts, but it seems like if DOOM didn't want the world to assume that DOOM is really just one group that has created (or subsumed!) multiple alliances for the sake of political fiction, maybe they should stop referring to themselves collectively as DOOM in the OWF. Kinda weird to blame everyone else for being confused in the face of your own obfuscation.
You use that excuse when it's convenient and ignore it when its convenient. DT is also referred to as Doom, and yet they were left out. It's disingenuous and you know it, but I also acknowledge you'll probably quit this world before you'll ever confess to it.
So we'll see you on the war screen.
-
1 hour ago, lilweirdward said:
I don't know if this is just genuinely confusing everyone or if some folks are being deliberately obtuse, but I can make this really simple either way: FTW and NATO responded defensively to DBDC's blanket DoW, and included DS and DW as a preemptive action.
Here are some other FAQ that are hopefully helpful:
Are you ascribing DBDC's actions to DS and DW, who did not exist at the time that DBDC made their DoW?
That's not how preemptive wars work, so no.
So why include them?
They are indisputably Doom alliances, and have said in the past that attacking one is as good as an attack on all of them, hence the validity of a preemptive strike vs waiting for the inevitable counter.
Is that legal?
Sure, why not? Isn't that what you all did in Bicycle when you preempted COBRA in your attack on NG? Preemptive war is not a novel idea.
Why not include DT/CLAWS?
They are not indisputably Doom, or at least weren't prior to this war. Glad everyone is clear that they are now, though. Maybe you all should form an official unofficial meme bloc to prevent any confusion in the future.
Does that mean CLAWS/NPO could declare on all of RFD in defense of Doom?
Sure! Honestly, I half expected to be preempted on this exact basis, but instead NG and CCC apparently get to enjoy watching the fireworks from the sidelines, which is cool too!
Why wait until now to respond to the DoW?
Lots of reasons - timing, coalitions, boredom. Why does anyone do anything at the time they do it versus some other time? What a weird question.
Just to be clear, a pre emotive strike is not defensive.
We're fine with a war, but trying to call it a defensive war when neither DS nor DW attacked any of the parties involved is far fetched at best. And I don't think FTW or NATO were directly attacked by DBDC?
Regardless, this adds fun an excitement, so let's have it.
-
43 minutes ago, Smitty256 said:
An aggressive war? Doom is the one that declared war on us.
That's as if saying roll for damage declared on us. DBDC declared an open ended war 2 years ago, and you took the opportunity to take a shot at mostly DW/DS, who weren't even around at the time of said declaration. I'm curious what form of mental gymnastics you're using here
-
4 hours ago, HeroofTime55 said:
This might have a slim chance at making sense if you didn't just gloss over the fact that DBDCDSDW declared an open ended war on the world and proceeded to raid various alliances on their whim. If you want to make legalistic arguments here, you have no ground on which to stand - your ODP partners declared war on your MDoAP partner and you decided to drop the MDoAP partner for responding.
But, we all know this is just e-lawyering and isn't really what's going on. What's really going on is Pacifica doing the things Pacifica has always done, throwing loyal allies under the bus time and time again when they decide they've outlived their usefulness to Pacifica.
Why anyone, here at the end of the world, still wants to stand beside you, or cower on the sidelines, is beyond me. Some people, I guess, are just so addicted to their spreadsheet numbers that friendships mean nothing to them.I'm sorry, I'm just finding a hard time findinf the DS sigs on that DoW. Although that's mostly because DS didn't exist at the time. Could you, by chance, help me locate them?
Having said that, it dies appear as though you coward from then for 2 years, so I mean...
-
14 hours ago, Johnny Apocalypse said:
The Delusions of Grandeur War
I'm voting for this tbh. I'm game for waiting, but Herogasim is a fairly stupid name dictated by maybe 3 alliances? Not sure people should be acting like the names already been decided.
Those alliances are free to refer to it however they want, but for community purposes, the name isn't decided.
-
Just now, Canik said:
Typical Doom. Thinks NS is all that matter. "why are they not calling in allies don't they realize their losing pixels!?!?!" lmaoWhat, then, was your point in referencing Invicta not asking for help? I thought it was to indicate we couldn't fight, but clearly that's not what you were trying ti say, so maybe clarify your point?
-
3 minutes ago, Canik said:
lol. Did I touch a nerve? Sorry if you want glory you shouldn't cry for help. But instead as usual you wanted safety and easy wins.
A thoroughly devastating response. I'm sure in your mind, that witty retort made your actions more honorable or brave
-
8 minutes ago, Canik said:
Oh sorry forgot like 6 years ago you attacked Invicta, failed to make them bring in help and so others had to hit SNX. Also you had FTW on your side then hitting TOP, Polar, Sparta and Alpha Wolves. I don't recall Doom on AW at all.. maybe you had one person.
So yeah once in ancient times you fought a couple months with tons of help. *slow claps*
Fixed.Lol, Invicta lost significantly more NS than we did, and we absolutely contributed to Alpha Wolves, given it was at leadt me, Stone, Claude and Hersh, and probably a few others, but I think our mid tier was bogged down on Fark, while our power tier was still focusing heavily on Polar. We entered to give you guys a boisterous, which isnprobably why the so effectively touched a nerve.
We also just reformed about a year ago, and have been fighting Red Alert, and were literally in the process of grinding warchests in tech, which I'm sure even you would acknowledge as an actual war.
But the only thing that matters is what fits your narrative, right? I'd ask you what 'real' war you've fought in the last 6 years, but I know which one you will refer to, and as I've heard from many people your ego inflates the contribution your alliance gave. But by all means, continue raving like a lunatic
-
53 minutes ago, Canik said:
Yeah the 1st one doesn't make much sense as Doom had to call for pappy NPO.
The 2nd one is better since it doesn't compare Doom to clearly superior FTW.
though "Doombird strikes *again*"? So another admission that Doom are aggressors? awesome. yep 8/10 for sure
Lol, you had 200 guys against what? Less than 100? And we've already been at war for 60 days. And despite of outnumbering us 2 to 1, we still declared almost as many wars against you as you did to us, despite you guys having literally planned the blitz. Cute, but the only thing superior about FTW is the size of its ego.
-
1 hour ago, Canik said:
LMAO Doom already thinks the war is over?!?! Makes sense I guess they never have fought a real war. Better strap in we're just getting started! 😂You seem to have forgotten Doom War, wheb we fought Polar, ISX, Legion, SUN, Invicta, amd Alpha Wolves, to name a few. It's a cute pot shot, but false all the same.
-
2 hours ago, HeroofTime55 said:
I'm going to simplify this for you since you're struggling
1) Nation gains a whole bunch of cheated multi tech (lets say, 70k, i don't know what the real number is but let's use this as an example)
2) Nation with 70k illegal tech conducts a bunch of raids and gains from those raids, say, 100k land and another 80k tech, that would not have been possible without the initial 70k illegal tech
3) Nation gets their 70k illegal tech deleted (instead of being deleted from the game as they should have been) but gets to keep the 100k land and 80k tech that the illegal tech let them get.
This, you think, is a fair and equitable outcome?
Cheaters should be banned, plenty of people have been banned for far, far less over the years. It's a goddamn joke that they haven't been, but alas, we all understand very well why it's the case. It's just a shame, some of us remember when this was a vibrant game.If you believe rules were broken, there is an avenue to report that. Otherwise what you're doingnis baseless speculation, so come back with concrete proof and a report, and focus in the subject at hand. Appreciated. Sorry, but people have been accusing each other over this crap for decades, and these claims rarely have any substance. And this is not the place for that kind of discussion
-
14 minutes ago, HeroofTime55 said:
This is a great preview into CLAWS competency. Out of 122 CLAWS nations, about 15 of them showed up for the update quad. An old school strategy that relies on sudden and overwhelming force. Instead they barely mustered to let out a dry fart.Lol, do you want to do a count in the number of individual nations you guys sent? 25 FTW, with 11 before update. Out of 155
Nato 9, with 6 before update. Out of 51
DooMadLadSquad Treaty
in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Posted · Edited by Gh0s7
o7 to us and a long friendship