Jump to content

fant0m

Banned
  • Posts

    443
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by fant0m

  1. [quote name='JimKongIl' timestamp='1285285798' post='2462684']
    You are, I was just goading a bit. No true offense intended. Best of luck for a good fight.
    [/quote]

    Good luck to you as well and may you bring me many casualties. Bob Sanders has been in the top 5 for far too long.

  2. [quote name='Andre27' timestamp='1285263707' post='2462292']
    Not immoral.

    Weak, inept, unable to fend for themselves, in need of a new pair of diaper perhaps? All things which can be said at this time.
    I may or may not agree with them, but It is embarrassing when an alliance of 278 members needs to rely on their allies to fix their problems.

    But a 1 on 1 fight must be extremely scary for them.
    [/quote]

    So you're telling me if your top nation (Solomon) was hit by a rogue at the very upper limit of his declaration range you would simply let Solomon fight it out alone because you think asking your friends for help is somehow akin to cowardice? :blink:

  3. [quote name='Viking' timestamp='1281608645' post='2412564']
    You believe he's not guilty, correct?

    You went to war over him, and are losing badly.

    Guess what you'll probably have to do anyway!
    [/quote]

    Don't bother asking for proof of guilt when we attack one of your members....just pay the reps we demand or we'll roll you and take the reps as well!

  4. [quote name='Van Hoo III' date='20 June 2010 - 11:59 PM' timestamp='1277074735' post='2344206']
    No, all you do in PC is sit and whine. You are a pack of crybabies who will quickly be forgotten the day that you disband.

    I regret ever defending you when you were wronged by TPF long after our treaty was cancelled. It is obvious to me that you are just as clueless as everyone said you were and simply cause drama with other alliances for the sake of doing so.
    [/quote]

    If only you had defended us when we were originally wronged, remember, when we actually had a treaty? I'm not sure where you have gotten this fantastically egotistical view of your own alliance from but I would certainly enjoy reading your reasoning behind it. I honestly can't remember RoK ever doing anything of any great note other than sitting in the shadows more than willing to serve whoever is in power. Nor have I heard RoK mentioned when talking about the great military alliances in the game.

    The only things PC has or ever will want from CN is to stand by our allies no matter what and have some fun playing the game our way. Those things have guided our path through CN and your ego has driven that of RoK.

    I won't be checking this thread again anyway. I only came here to see with my own eyes an alliance I respect in NoR signing with CN's resident snake in the grass.

  5. [quote name='Van Hoo III' date='20 June 2010 - 11:24 PM' timestamp='1277072658' post='2344173']
    Expected to see a crap alliance like PC pop out of their hole with commentary about RoK. Amusing to see that after literally a year of not speaking, you suddenly have this mancrush on us. I guess I should expect such astute observations and dialog from an alliance that has never amounted to anything more than a minor nuisance in the grand scheme of things.

    Oh wait, I forgot to add a smiley to give my post more of a wink-wink nudge-nudge cutesy feel ...

    :)


    There, now we're square.
    [/quote]

    All we do in PC is sit here wishing we had the quality and loyalty of RoK. I often dream of us amounting to something and coming even close to the endless achievements of Ragnarok. Maybe if we started kissing $@! and sitting on fences so we don't upset anyone we could begin the long and arduous process. :)

  6. [quote name='Mannatech' date='10 March 2010 - 01:04 PM' timestamp='1268226567' post='2220863']
    This is one of the nations that PC attacked. We have been a protectorate of Echelon since before the Karma War there really is no doubt about that. It never expired. I can't believe PC is lying about this now. You guys suck. So I suppose they are going to get away with it?
    [/quote]

    What exactly are we "lying" about? Echelon can keep saying 'oh anyone can edit the wiki so it isn't legit' as many times as they want but the fact is it wasn't just anyone who edited the wiki. It was 2 members of Echelon.

    The raiders who hit SBA are experienced raiders and I also don't believe for half a second one of the nations they hit had "Protected by Echelon" in their bios. It's the very first thing we check before anything else and to say this would have been overlooked before even proceeding to the wiki is laughable.

    Mistakes have been made on both sides but they were honest mistakes and I don't see why we should be made to pay reps over this.

  7. FOK, Molon Labe, PC, TheZoo, tR and NSO are the standouts I can think of. The alliance I've been most impressed with though is NoR, those guys have kicked some serious $@!.

    MK, obviously, but nobody can match MK for skill and everyone already knows they can perform amazingly well under fire.

    TOP have handed out a lot of damage but it's hardly a surprise given the 3 years worth of nation building and relative peace they've enjoyed.

    Special thanks go to Zeke, bast4rd and Atrocities of ML/DOOM. You 3 were by far my hardest opponents and the best I've fought for a long time.

    EDIT: Almost forgot FAN. Just shy of 2 years of VietFAN and they're back as good as ever. Never can another claim for being a badass alliance ever hold a candle to that.

  8. [quote name='Buds The Man' date='08 February 2010 - 05:59 PM' timestamp='1265651953' post='2168874']
    Look man seriously we asked for their help with DT because our larger nations are taking a pounding. Since they have come in im sure a couple of yall have noticed a couple of quick punches to the nose. HIYA TITAN won em both today :lol1:. Does it really matter who they DOWed on as that truly hasnt stoped you from doing hands across bob and chaining in a bunch more NS.

    ML you guys are awesome and Thank you for comming in to give us a hand. We do appreciate it. We couldnt ask for better friends.

    o/ ML
    o/ Casualties
    [/quote]

    I of course respect ML for defending their friends against the odds. I was just caught off guard with them taking cheap shots at DT and responded on impulse. Could everyone quit it though making out as if it's FOK/BH/DT/PC/NoR fighting ML alone. We are fighting just a few other alliances as well. Alliances among those most highly rated at war in the game I might add.

    Classy post though Bud and may Molon Labe bring me many casualties. (When I finally get a taste :ehm: )

  9. [quote name='kswiss2783' date='08 February 2010 - 11:56 AM' timestamp='1265630195' post='2168577']
    My first thought was who? Then I realized that it doesn't matter and we really are just that badass.

    edit- spelling
    [/quote]

    If ML are as good as they think they are we're all going to be ZI'd within a few days. :ph34r:

  10. [quote name='chefjoe' date='07 February 2010 - 10:27 PM' timestamp='1265581638' post='2167480']
    Wanna bet?

    My money is on ML in that case.
    [/quote]

    I was...over exaggerating...for effect? I have not checked but I should certainly think a 38 man, 2mil NS alliance has more combined casualties than any one nation.

    [quote name='Roadie' date='07 February 2010 - 10:56 PM' timestamp='1265583394' post='2167547']
    Think between DT, PC, Nordreich and Fok that you lot have enough alliances to handle ML or would you be more comfortable if you brought in a few more?
    [/quote]

    I'm sure PC would welcome TPF's DoW on us with open arms if you're that bothered. :awesome:

    Anyhoo, trash talk aside, good luck to all of Molon Labe. I'm expecting a good fight and, of course, plenty of casualties.

  11. [quote name='Baldr' date='07 February 2010 - 08:24 PM' timestamp='1265574252' post='2167231']
    Wow. Some guy with no wars is saying that we have no balls, and then complaining about how *we* talk.

    Unfortunately, that's pretty much exactly the way I expect PC to act. No class at all.
    [/quote]

    Congratulations, you've managed to declare on a single nation who's smaller than you.


    [quote name='Chimay' date='07 February 2010 - 08:28 PM' timestamp='1265574487' post='2167235']
    And you are who? Yeah, he doesn't have one, guess he has no clue what the hell he is doing, why is he even playing? What is going on here? Who am I again? Ease up on the guy, most of us are senile and with onset dementia at our ages...

    To be quite frank, had we chosen who our allies wanted us to fight, it would not have been DT, I forgot they even existed...
    [/quote]

    Not that I like to be :smug: but I probably have more casualties than your entire alliance combined. And your allies can't have had much faith in you if they only trust you to take on the smallest alliance attacking them.

    MK have good words to say about you which means a lot in my book so perhaps I'm wrong. Maybe it's just all this laughable posturing coming from ML that's caught me off-guard. You guys sound like TPF, lets hope you don't fight like them.

  12. [quote name='Chimay' date='07 February 2010 - 06:32 PM' timestamp='1265567542' post='2167060']
    I have to echo my friend Pepper's statement, almost wish it was you guys we were fighting, some of the battle and intel reports we have been seeing from DT...ugh.... to say they are in our favor is a slight understatement, hopefully they are just slow to warm.
    [/quote]

    Coming from an alliance whose top nation doesn't even have a WRC.... :rolleyes:

    Maybe if you guys had any balls you could have attacked PC instead of whining when you picked arguably the easiest target. We'll see if ML is still complaining about having an easy fight after this war is done.

    I actually thought ML was a classy alliance and above the kind of remarks I've seen in this thread. I guess I was wrong.

×
×
  • Create New...