Jump to content

Frostfirefox

Members
  • Posts

    468
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Frostfirefox

  1. [quote name='paul711' timestamp='1301118655' post='2676920']
    Cold day in hell any OP nation surrenders. We fight to the death and we fight for the rest of the round. Lets do this @#$@.
    [/quote]

    They aren't surrendered :3 thats a willful decision. I like ropes and chains. Its more fun.

  2. [quote name='thaisport' timestamp='1301099707' post='2676498']
    If you could get 400 GC, I'd be impressed as many people aren't always on at the same time. Btw, I know what it is to run a top level alliance. When I was leading my alliance in TE was about 400 at its peak and averaged 330 people over several rounds.
    [/quote]

    Yes but things are majorly different now. Back then MI got rolled by a coalition of alliances over a free raiding thing imposed by them.

    MI could be loosely translated as G-6 now (without the imposing of policies). It's only natural to be ready for an attack by multiple alliances or perhaps just a single rogue. Especially on the weekends.

  3. Its only an issue when its G-6. How many threads contain G-6 in them? All of them practically?

    Also, 154 GC's compared to 101 nations isn't all to suprising, especially with many high tier nations who back collect with GC's. Maybe if it were 400. Weirdo.

  4. [quote name='Thomasj_tx' timestamp='1299607548' post='2656828']
    Oh really?

    Because we just came off of an even, fair and bloody war with the great fighting alliance TPC? :blink:
    [/quote]

    Not even close, your lucky they waited for you to get finished imo.

  5. [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1298793977' post='2646020']
    Didn't need them. On the other hand, I also did 4 times the damage you did when you had the ability to declare at your leisure. But again, neither here nor there at the moment. I just want to piss some people off and get a few wars on me, I'm already bored.
    [/quote]

    You personally did or the 4 people i was fighting did :P 4 times the damage divided by 4 is 1, so essentially you did the same damage to me i did to you is what your saying?

  6. [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1298792890' post='2646008']
    Oh, apparently it's difficult to win GA's after a nuke now, eh? [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/PYU3Q.gif[/IMG]

    Anyway, that's neither here nor there. Your (in)ability to damage me elsewhere has little bearing on how much I'm going to enjoy seeing you and your allies pay for every dime you take.
    [/quote]

    No it diffcult to win GA's when your opponent doesn't know what GC's or barracks are :P

  7. [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1298792482' post='2646001']
    I assumed your intention was to cause me damage. You...didn't, outside of the nukes.
    [/quote]

    Which is how I got your moneyz to pay for mah nukes right? :P which ended up hitting several other nations :)

  8. [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1298791715' post='2645986']
    Because certain styles are associated with certain situations. In my case, I am denying my foes the ability to profit despite the advantage. In your case...well, I would think doing damage outside of the n00b-tube would have been a priority.
    [/quote]

    I have no intention of rebuilding there if thats what your curious about, so technically, from the amount destroyed of the 10 or so nations I fought solo, it was an exceedingly high profit for me :3 i had tons of fun and I didn't have to save money for it because I just took yours ;)

  9. [quote name='Locke' timestamp='1298791069' post='2645972']
    I was referencing an event you have no knowledge of; in Steve I play a little differently. Feel free to test my mettle if you wish though, since you seem to enjoy hitting the bottom of your range.
    [/quote]

    Then why would you criticize me about warchests when you yourself have none and claim that its your play style :3 I already claimed its my play style >.> so what is the diff

×
×
  • Create New...