Jump to content

Frostfirefox

Members
  • Posts

    468
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Frostfirefox

  1. [quote name='paul711' timestamp='1302581922' post='2689183']
    I have fought 4 nations double my size and numerous others since, but I haven't been anarchied yet and still have infra to fight with.
    What's your point?
    [/quote]

    My point is obvious. Is everyone on your gov teams shallow?

    Each side has good and bad fighters. Calling a single side out to be all bad fighters is a very retarded thing to do.

  2. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1302581595' post='2689175']
    I think you guys had 105 or so at the start of the war and have been losing guys since.

    I also have no idea why the others entered. Guess they wanted a piece of the evil villain.
    [/quote]

    Regardless, they are on your side. So it's not like we are only fighting PLOW nations.

  3. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1302581665' post='2689177']
    Is this the second time someone in G-6 is implying they are not very good at fighting?
    [/quote]

    You only wish ;) you guys aren't the cream of the crop either, it took 6 nukes to finish my 1799 infra nation off finally

    So don't go cherry picking

  4. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1302580588' post='2689147']
    Please explain.
    [/quote]

    Considering it took PLOW + TFK + PP + LEFT + god knows how many others to destroy 80 nations, I salute you. It's an honor. Really.

  5. Its expected of PLOW to be to shallow to realize their advantages in wars. They aren't the brightest when it comes to planning. But it just so happened that their advantage was unavoidable this war.

    The first war G-6 had this round was declared a curb stomp too. Even though they had plenty of an advantage minus our blitz. They focused on the fact that "It's to hard to coordinate with other alliances." Just an excuse to why they were losing the war. Perhaps its because they failed to realize that the other alliances were still fighting, and winning in many areas.

    This war you have the advantage in long term warring. We had the initial advantage because of higher ans and nukes. However we hindered ourselves some by multitasking. Performing two plans at once. War and the endgame. We already knew the war would have to be accomplished on the blitz, which wasn't even an advantage anymore due to the circumstances of you guys being heavily prepared.

    However, with higher nation counts you have far higher output. Its safe to say that even with the lower ANS you guys had, you easily made it up by having most our slots full. The first set of wars was in our advantage. We annihilated your top tiers allowing us to proceed with other things. Long term advantage, your nations outnumber the fighting nations 2:1 meaning you can stay out of anarchy, re roll, stagger and rebuild much easier than our nations. We still however have been fighting to the extent we can.

    As for the intial nuke count, more than half our nukes are stockpiled in around 20% of our nations. Most of which aren't at war with PLOW. It can't be helped we are losing the battles we are in, because your advantage was unavoidable and peace would be heavily unachievable after the blitz. However, I think that it is overall a balanced war regardless of you guys crying over the 2 major disadvantages you guys had.

    You'll call anything a curb stomp if you think you might have trouble in any area of the war. Including the first war with LE that was just due to their lack of trying to coordinate and our blitz. Perhaps we crushed their morale and they gave in with the fight barely starting.

    We never intended the war as a curb stomp, just as a war against a bunch of people who have issue with us. 4 good fighting alliances vs G-6. Along with the multiple nations that flocked over to your ranks and the additional alliances we are fighting. You had more NS, more nations. We had higher ANS and more nukes. We benefit short term you benefit long term.

    Even my daughter could have figured this out guys >.>

  6. [quote name='King Ernie' timestamp='1302022345' post='2684725']
    I laugh at your nation :awesome:

    :wub: Youmu.

    EDIT: no really though, your nation has some pretty good jokes, had me LOL'ing in my trench.
    [/quote]

    I had each and everyone of my soldiers go through theater courses :smug:

  7. [quote name='paul711' timestamp='1301955235' post='2684221']
    LOL I laugh at you guys and your blocs. If any of the AAs in PLOW have a problem we usually tend to take care of it ourselves and don't need a bloc.
    [/quote]

    I laugh at your AA :3

  8. [quote name='lonewolfe2015' timestamp='1301954432' post='2684202']
    intentionally avoided any situation that would put them in a difficult place for wars
    [/quote]

    We waited for you guys to get a bloc going. But you can't put your failures on us :3

  9. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1301584373' post='2681417']
    You mean you think R and S mean something other than Carlos Accords and Legion. I'm shocked.
    [/quote]

    I don't think R and S mean anything of significance, no :3 but I still will teach you about them since you are having issues matching them up

  10. [quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1301572688' post='2681347']
    Why would I need tutoring? Are you saying they don't stand for Legion and Carlos Accords? If so, what would they stand for?
    [/quote]

    I'll teach you how to use letters :3

  11. [quote name='commander thrawn' timestamp='1301506480' post='2680729']
    But you guys will get yours soon enough.
    [/quote]

    If you don't pull through on this threat can I make 50 threads about you calling you a liar and stuff?

  12. [quote name='Thomasj_tx' timestamp='1301505956' post='2680722']
    You do realize that there is this rule, right?



    And you also realize that a nation can not declare war if they are in Anarchy, right?
    [/quote]

    Sorry. Are you implying something there? :3

  13. [quote name='Thomasj_tx' timestamp='1301467659' post='2680525']
    Now that is one of the most disingenuous things I have heard in a while.

    There is no way you can get anyone to believe that it is equally easy to coordinate intra-alliance as it is inter-alliance. And with 4 alliances to boot. :rolleyes:
    [/quote]

    i use ingame pm's for coordination, ask the people timezones and tell them instructions to reach a certain goal

  14. [quote name='Thomasj_tx' timestamp='1301460952' post='2680458']
    Welcome to the fun!

    [size="2"]Now watch the whining kick into overdrive.[/size] :lol1:
    [/quote]

    :| i'm so mad exactly what i predicted would happen is happening :| ffffuuuu

×
×
  • Create New...