Frostfirefox
-
Posts
468 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by Frostfirefox
-
-
[quote name='Bionic redhead' timestamp='1293711912' post='2558223']
I'm surprised that someone declared on us. As for who declared on us, not so much.
Saying certain people (who shall go by the nicknames Bdude and Bonfusion to protect their identities) hold grudges is kinda like saying that water is wet.
[/quote]
[url="http://gizmodo.com/5624936/there-is-such-thing-as-dry-water"]Dry Water[/url], lol -
I look forward to our battle clash.
-
[quote name='sarasate' timestamp='1293690306' post='2558038']
just a question; isn't g-6 part of the ceasefire 'til 1/2/11, while RE and Warriors are just not involved in it at all? I just don't see why g-6 is taking part... shouldn't it be between alliances not in the ceasefire treaty?
[/quote]
Yes and no -
[quote name='bcortell' timestamp='1293188932' post='2552570']
You realize that was posted after NAC had signed it and been put on the list, right? (He also said that anyone on the list will stay on the list no matter the size of them.)
[/quote]
I underlined the important part because I already knew this. It was stated that this was not meant as raid protection. -
[quote name='Ferrie' timestamp='1292974190' post='2548854']
[u]Just wanted to add that this is [b]NOT[/b] meant as a way to keep your small alliance from getting raided.[/u] I'll keep the Alliances on that we're already there, but no alliances with less than 10 members will be added.
Salute!
[/quote]
I guess I should read some of the previous posts more often
I feel like this fits perfect into this situation. -
[quote name='Confusion' timestamp='1293158729' post='2552221']
Eh, I thought no alliances under 10 members would be participating in the truce in the first place.
[/quote]
^ This ^
There have been many raids on members of this signed treaty. So why is it that RE is the only one things are made a big deal over? In reality its not overly important. Also the treaty states
[quote]Also, any act of war against any alliance signed will be considered an act of war against ALL signatories, and will be squashed like a bug.[/quote]
I do not know the exact context as it was meant. But straight forward seems like [b]anyone[/b] who raids one of these signed parties will be dealt with by all. So I guess we should demand public apologies from all of them too. Superfriends raided The Hell Patrol. Guess a public apology is in order. Essentially. It's a raid. Deal with it like normal. If your feelings were hurt I can give you a tissue but I don't think RE is in any position to have to apologize over something so little.
Edit: I forgot to add why I quoted confusion. -
[quote name='Clash' timestamp='1292628132' post='2542088']
Youmu, despite all his "people should fight all round long" rhetoric, has no wars and hasn't fought anyone in a long time. I guess everyone's just too busy to raid him and he's too pathetic to do what he tells everyone else to do and war for himself. He reallyyyy doesn't do very much around here, y'know. Just flap his keyboard. If he stays doing what he did this round, perhaps tW won't get a chance to raid him, his slots will always be full. He was very popular with LE this round, after all.
I don't raid anyways, most of our gov doesn't raid, and really comparably few of our members raid. A lot of the time, as I've said, it's the ghosts in hiding or the plants trying to start up trouble. Most alliance raid rules are very specific in what they say people can do or can't do, and ours are no different. This new policy is merely an extension of that, getting even more specific; in this case not so much who you can NOT raid, but as to who you CAN. I still won't raid, most of our members still won't raid. But at least those who do like to raid will be pointed in a useful direction
[/quote]
Sorry I've been busy. Much of it unplanned school stuff. Some holiday fun stuff. So your saying I don't war but do war? Confusing but I will roll with it. LE started with a friend attacking me and another LE nation as well. I wasn't extremely active during that time so I missed key elements of the war. Such as the part where I was literally destroyed. You than tried to smear my name by saying "I'm no good in wars and that I'm not fighting back so clearly I must suck." After those wars expired I declared on my friend and had 3 LE nations declare on me (as predicted). I fought hard and tried to deal as much damage as possible. It rolls into my plan, I knew that LE would defend him and that I would need to slowly eat away to achieve anything. I declared war again right after that but was only available for 2 days (Thanksgiving travels). I had the benefit of LE being at war and only 1 nation countered me. I then got back and took a break. I haven't had war for the last 16 days, granted but I was going to 4 days ago but stuff happened at school that had generally ruined my week. So I never cared to check.
I may argue a lot Clash but I try to be extremely respectable about it. I try to avoid touching anything other than the topic at hand. But it can't be helped if people hate me. I can't control others emotions. If I could I wouldn't be playing this game
I'd be out conquering the world by making everyone love me. I would then be the supreme ruler of Earth. (hint: avoid giving me emotion control).
Edit:grammar stuff... tired -
[quote name='KOwens06' timestamp='1292521915' post='2540982']
Yep, would you like me to add your name?
[/quote]
Is that a formal invite? -
[quote name='KOwens06' timestamp='1292513987' post='2540929']
perma-raid list
[/quote]
Is that so? -
[quote name='Clash' timestamp='1292081684' post='2536392']
You have no wars, and apparently you stink at it, from what those who've fought you say. Here we are at the end of the round and you sit around with a shiny clean nation that has no casualties. For all your preaching about how everyone else should do things - you do nothing yourself. Everyone else has to do things - you do not. You never have, and it appears you never will. Yeah, you can talk all kinds of smack. You lack the sack to walk any of it.
[/quote]
You should pay attention to past tense.
[quote]
And my wars have [b]gone[/b] great. Not sure what that has to do with this though. You keep asking me that it seems.[/quote]
Little details are good to pay attention to. As for my current wars, they are still in the planning stages and I have no need to release my plans to you. Thanks for caring so much about my wars though, even though you really don't and just want to try to one up me. Casualties do not carry past re rolls. You are being pretty naive here. You should also pay attention to the day the nation was created. It seems you are the one taking things out of context.
Also, I doubt you have talked to anyone reliable. They are probably similar to you and will spit out anything just to seem funny or superior. In effect, gossip. -
[quote name='memoryproblems' timestamp='1291614969' post='2531714']
Your strategy is brilliant.
Its hard for other people to argue with you when you change your stance every 30 minutes. Brilliant indeed.
[/quote]
It feels like your strategy. -
[quote name='Clash' timestamp='1291968419' post='2535543']
Fff, taking things out of context since forever. Poor show, son.
You finish #2 on the worst poster list
How are your own wars coming along? ohwai
[/quote]
Taking things out of context? So your saying if I added the rest of the text to those quotes they won't be insults anymore? Interesting thought but I'm not sure that is very accurate.
[quote]too long; don't read: [b]Burning Glory is proven a blithering ignorant silly stooge.[/b]
Just skip it, really.[/quote]
[quote]Oh nah DR just had another of their nations go rogue on us, like they have several times already this round. Interfering with other people's alliance wars has become one of their specialties, eh Confusion? I guess TPC/TF/Fark/Abyss/Heroes/RE/various rogues, and everyone else who's been sticking their noses into our wars all round long need all the help they can get.
[b]In some ways, that's quite a compliment - albeit a compliment from LOSERS.[/b]
It's great to be a Warrior![/quote]
[quote]Based on every single little thing - this used to be a fair war. I've gone far beyond what I've needed to do to prove it, stats, fact, tier comparisons, we can argue activity and NS and use examples from other recent wars, whatever else is needed. It was a more than fair war. [b]Only an idiot still argues differently. You're just so useless.[/b] If you spent half the time you use to blather on stupidly to actually play the game - no, I guess you'd still be an idiot tho. [/quote]
[quote]Ah but we are, that's kind of the point. We were fighting a nice even match-up and had filled our war slots. It was looking to be pretty good and fair war. Then some bunch of cowards came along to do their best to make it a curbstomp. [b]I guess this is what you losers do though, this is the rep you're getting.[/b] Cowardly punks who can't fight even-up.
Your actions make you a punk, Hisk.
Any confusion there? [/quote]
And my wars have gone great. Not sure what that has to do with this though. You keep asking me that it seems. -
[quote name='Clash' timestamp='1291963134' post='2535505']
I crushed your stupid post in excess detail. I even provided links when possible.
None of my post was BS, it was all pretty well backed up. [b]All you have are pure insults.[/b]
[b]
BG, you're the worst. Poster. EVA.[/b]
[/quote]
[quote]Burning Glory is proven a blithering ignorant silly stooge.[/quote]
[quote]In some ways, that's quite a compliment - albeit a compliment from LOSERS.[/quote]
[quote]Only an idiot still argues differently. You're just so useless.[/quote]
[quote]I guess this is what you losers do though, this is the rep you're getting.[/quote]
You were saying? -
[quote name='Ninja gumby' timestamp='1291955383' post='2535413']
LIES!! You are only fighting one DF nation. Yes he is in anarchy. Yes he is also in five wars. [url="http://tournament.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=1001996"]Your war screen[/url]
[/quote]
He's so good he made the other one disappear. -
[quote name='Clash' timestamp='1291823436' post='2533929']
Hypocrites are people who say one thing and do another.
You constantly demand other people do things - and you never do anything.
SCOREBOARD!
Why would you even think you do that?
[/quote]
To be fair, I never said I was personally going to start an alliance and fuel the attempt of changing things up. I had a few small plans I hadn't approached anyone with, but since I never stated I was going to do it, not doing it is in no way hypocritical.
I never needed to do anything anyways. I threw in my support and helped influence others who may have never thought about the possibilities for the game and pondered about a few things. I thought about bringing people I know personally into the game. But if I did, I would have asked someone to lead it for me because of possible time constraints. Someone I knew would manage to cause chaos. But... I never counted on The Warriors getting tangled in with an opponent who had a treaty partner, lest of all one who was smart enough to use it. All it takes are a few things (some based on luck) to create a domino effect in the political and war aspects of the game. I didn't expect The Warriors to show boat around because of previous wars they have had with RE and practically ask them to join the war, which they did triggering another alliance to join in against RE. I didn't have to do anything because you ended up doing it without realizing it. And your alliance is willing to continue doing this by threatening to force RE to change AA's to humiliate them. I never expected things to happen through The Warriors. But due to the brazen personalities of many of the Warriors leaders, they are practically like many other villainous alliances. Just with a different ideology.
But once again, don't worry about my nation. I have many motives. Seeking change in TE is only one of them and this is the only round I have supported it majorly. I could rogue Warriors if you care that deeply about things I am doing but I think that might cause 2 pages of Warriors calling me a cheap/dirty player or something. Which is completely true but I'm willing to avoid more call outs. -
[quote name='Clash' timestamp='1291797699' post='2533794']
Why bother? Why would I care?
It's just fun to point you're a hypocrite on most of what you say.
...and you STILL don't ever do anything.
You just complain about people who do
How's that alliance for next round coming along?
[/quote]
I don't see how voicing myself on the forums and having war for myself is hypocritical at all towards my goals or myself. Just because you don't like me doing it does not make it hypocritical. I have never went against my opinions on topics for the sake of one upping someone in an argument. And just because I am not going to build an alliance does not make me a hypocrite. There are already plenty of alliances out there. I'm more of a type to bring in new players and I do not want the responsibility of leading because I do tend to get busy and disappear for periods at a time.
And if you don't care quit bringing it up every post. Cheers. -
[quote name='Clash' timestamp='1291750614' post='2533110']
What does anything you say ever have to do with anything you do?
Despite all your talk, your shiny clean new nation sits there doing nothing.
[/quote]
I agree it is shiny and clean. Longest era of peace I have had all round. 6 days. Don't be so thick to not even look past the shiny exterior. Maybe if you clicked the detailed alliance statistics of the Powerpuff Girls you can see some of my round history. Since it is a rogue alliance for me and I am the only one in it. That NS chart really is handy.
[quote]Right a ROUGE alliance. Meaning that you have no clue how to run a real aa.
So for you to talk poorly about another aa's leadership is preposterous.
And no it's not very "neat". The fact that you declared on your treaty
partner also show the lame brain thought process that is clearly seen
in your post.[/quote]
Ha I liked that DoW. Usually I don't like a lot of my own work, but I liked that one. I will let you in on a hint about it. The treaty was the DoW. Derp. -
[quote name='Judge X' timestamp='1291705681' post='2532735']
All 5 of you?
[/quote]
Listing lazily into attack. You guys are probably confused as to whats going on. -
[quote name='Zebula25' timestamp='1291593080' post='2531345']
^^^
LMAO, This, coming from some one who's AA is "Powerpuff Girls".
You have no right to even speak to a real alliance leader, let
alone say that they are "bad" lol.
[/quote]
What does my alliance affiliation have to do with anything I have said? Powerpuff Girls has been my roguing AA for a few rounds now. Neat huh? It first started out when I declared war on Yuri from OMGKITTENSGOMEW after signing a treaty with them. So once again, what does my AA have to do with anything I have said? -
I love
-
[quote name='KOwens06' timestamp='1291587360' post='2531251']
Oh yes can you please point out where I have so called whined? If I recall correctly my post was thanks for letting us know ahead of time. and my second post was something along the lines of what happened earlier that day.
The rest of your post is just attacking us because you have no real argument, Which Im really not going to argue with. First, you use a straw man argument thinking we care and now you are using ad homeninem w/o stating proof other than we whine. Please try better next time.
Also were not like you, we at least put our nation on the line instead of just post incessantly over and over with the same content. Like seriously can we stop this back and forth argument.
All I stated was we really don't care they DoW'd on us. The reason they did doesn't make sense. The timing is odd and so on and so forth. But we are gonna fight its not a big deal. So please post something new to me other than, All you do is do the same thing in TE round in and round out and we whine. I'd like to have a real argument.
[/quote]
You must have missed my argument. The Warriors leaders are bad because:
a. They should have foreseen possible counter strikes from other alliances
b. They think calling the honor or whatever of The Abyss into play will solve the issue of them attacking (I must be on a different page then most others. I mean its a game, who gives a damn about honor. )
c. They didn't research the target alliances. (researching stats for the 'fair war' ideology does not count. It's much more efficient to research their friends and not assume they won't jump in because the war is 'fair'.)
[quote]All I stated was we really don't care they DoW'd on us. The reason they did doesn't make sense.[/quote]
It makes sense to me. Whats not to get? They had a treaty. They used it. Do you want some deep philosophical answer that involves their feelings and emotions of why they choose to attack you? -
[quote name='KOwens06' timestamp='1291584760' post='2531195']
Haha you act like we care. We just think the move by them to interrupt a perfectly good war was stupid.
But oh wait your on the said that thinks we whine and don't do anything.... right....
[/quote]
You do whine about a lot kind of like me. You guys are just like me. Isn't that fantastic. But hey, I'm not saying your not doing anything here. I'm saying your leadership isn't the brightest. -
[quote name='memoryproblems' timestamp='1291582892' post='2531156']
You act as if we should be concerned about RE. I'm not sure that we see it the same.
[/quote]
Make what you want of it. You reap what you sow. -
[quote name='Clash' timestamp='1291579791' post='2531118']
Based on every single little thing - this used to be a fair war. I've gone far beyond what I've needed to do to prove it, stats, fact, tier comparisons, we can argue activity and NS and use examples from other recent wars, whatever else is needed. It was a more than fair war. Only an idiot still argues differently. You're just so useless. If you spent half the time you use to blather on stupidly to actually play the game - no, I guess you'd still be an idiot tho.
[/quote]
It takes 5 minutes a day to play the game. Derp. I'm not going to refresh my nation page multiple times.
You missed skill level of individual nations. Things that CANT be documented in a statistical form is what I am getting at. Things that can't be put down on paper. So many unmarked things come into wars play that arguing about the 'fairness' of the war is pointless. If you spent half the time of your worrying about the fairness of the war trying to find someone to get on The Abyss... well might as well make that The Abyss and RE. You kind of screwed up on that note. I wouldn't blame RE for attacking.
An Announcement from G-6 & Roman Empire
in TE OWF Archive
Posted
[quote name='Bionic redhead' timestamp='1293713334' post='2558236']
Ahh, the third stooge arrived.
[/quote]
Something about a perma-raid list (i guess the honorable way to say ZI list). I recall something like that. Going by nicknames, a certain Youbu was threatened by the Warriors to be placed on such a thing. Youbu just wanted to share a statement: "Bonfusion has got my back."