Jump to content

Corpius

Members
  • Posts

    75
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Corpius

  1. Don't worry, you aren't the only one lolling. I don't understand what's so hard to understand about the box thing. It's quite clear. True they may have been at war for a week, but how much of that was the "fierce fighting". That happens in the first few days. The rest of the time, when the enemy has been subdued enough to not be a threat, you may relax and rebuild your warchest. More often than not, the offender has a better handling over their warchests then defenders. Plus, SOS and AI has been planning this for a long time. They knew about the date to attack and so had to opportunity to build up massive warchests. We, on the otherhand, didn't have much notice. And also, where is there a policy on us having to expel rogues, even though I'm not one? It was simply a misunderstanding (about the nuke thing). Not once did I say anything with the intent of it to make you believe it's true. And another hypocritical thing you have just committed is this: "ya'll just throw around claims and back up very little of them." and "i can only assume that CDT has lied about that policy as well."
  2. I'm just saying that you couldn't handle the war, even though it was pretty evenly matched (not including nukes), and so and went to fetch help.
  3. I'm not gonna quote that and make a wall of text... I meant "was". I don't get where you got the "has" from. Basically, it reads-The things I have said, are nothing, compared to what SOS said. You keep on asking idiotic questions about questions where the answer is so visible and known. We aren't idiots. We don't have to state everything, because it's already implied Ex. The box fell. It broke--------This is basically what you said, "The box fell. It broke. What broke?! Yeah, it doesn't matter if you lose any NS at all. They simply held off the enemy, using all of their warchests in the meantime. Then they are hit with little or no warchest. Oh no! I wonder what will happen now? Please, I hate hypocrits. Do not comment on lonewolf taking to our side and blaming the other (even though he didn't), while you take SOS's side and blame us. I don't know why you keep on saying that I'm lying even though I stated to you I'm not (I even gave you a definition). Go ahead and call us all the names you want, we don't care. Also, that is there is an example of an insult. Nah. I won't be leaving. I won't be kicked out. I guess I'll be seeing you around then! We actually are debating. (: a contention by words or arguments: as a : the formal discussion of a motion before a deliberative body according to the rules of parliamentary procedure b : a regulated discussion of a proposition between two matched sides ) Now, SOS go and cry to Mama for help (don't worry, I know about it, the help). Looking forward to you guys' turning this war unfair (to us).
  4. Well, since it doesn't matter about stats anymore, I'll say some. Look at your NS. You are at like 82K, while we are at 102K. We would have been higher, but that was from the nukes (your own) mostly.
  5. Very well then. I don't expect an answer then, unless of course you lied . And no actually, I meant the word "complain". And there is nothing wrong with the bold, that I see (care to explain? ) I don't know why you keep saying that I'm lying. Again, use a dictionary. "1: to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive" I (that's me) never said a statement meant to deceive anyone. I've admitted my mistake and have apologized. LIke I said, I didn't make up what was said about the nukes, that's why I didn't know them as clearly. And for the "no u" things, if you seriously can't see them, ok. You basically twist our own words around and aim them back towards us. That, to me, is "no u". It's just in a different form.
  6. Well, I wouldn't have. Don't about my leaders though. But in SE, we are quite big alliances that hardly need bad prestige now.
  7. We didn't know that. We can't have possibly known the history of your nation and if you used nukes or not. All we knew was that you had nukes. Therefore, it was the logical choice to spy away any nukes, just in case someone got an ichy finger. We had never intended to use them (at least, I hope not ) for fear of evoking world aggression for such horrid acts. You know it to be true. We wouldn't have used them, for world opinion of us would plummet.
  8. Hmm...just like lonewolf had said (no, you; no, you). How predictable. And seriously people, get a dictionary or take an English class, your vocab is just not up to standards. How interesting. What I said was nothing to what SOS has said throughout the thread. If you said I was "whining", they must have been crying. First off, I did not try to hide the fact. I remotely remembered it being said and cursed to myself. I, therefore, quickly edited my post and said the whole truth. Call me what you like. I didn't say what was said, and I hardly gave it a glance, because this thread had filled up with all this trash talk. I couldn't bother looking through all that. I admit my mistake.
  9. Looking forward to it. I mean, that's the least you can expect from such a dishonest alliance. And there's nothing you can say to protect yourself, all the proof's there. They started the nuclear war, even after we stated that we would and did not want to start one. EDIT: I have fired a nuke at a nation who owns nukes but has not yet fired them upon me. I'm sorry for the attack, but I can no longer trust you guys. It's pretty sad that another has to pay for another's actions.
  10. Good Job SOS. We promised to not use nuclear weapons but I was attacked by one. Thanks for leading us on. Don't complain when we crush you. http://tournament.cybernations.net/nation_...tion_ID=1000110 ^^Attacked me.
  11. So, who are they defending against? Not one of us has stooped so low as to make a derogatory remark against SOS; they on the other hand have made many threats and insults against us. We are simply trying to cool this down and are stating our reasons for our actions as thus. And about the stats, we wouldn't even be having this argument (there would have been no stat throwing) if it SOS didn't jump on stats, and based everything on numbers. We posted stats to counter-balance their own claims against us.
  12. Great job Wolfpack! You're the best! o/ Wolfpack!
  13. Hmmm...Can't believe I didn't see this. o/ UCN!
  14. I think that's why they are called Declarations of War for a reason... Technically, we didn't bring up any facts, any hard-hitting, cold evidence-numbers. We simply stated the strength difference, as to show you we know about it and are not trying to hide anything.
  15. SOS, we are keep telling you: It is fair, if everything is taken into perspective. The truth isn't in numbers. It never is based on fact. Instead, you must, as I have said, take everything into perspective. Things like war experience, skill (closely related), spirit, etc is what matters. You won't acknowledge it and instead keep on squirming around it. Never fully replying back to what was said. Please don't let this get out of hand. It's just a game. Please, everyone, show some decency and have great sportsmanship. EDIT: While I have been writing this, it seems more talks have occured. If any of this info. is outdated, please disregard it. I'm too lazy to delete and change anything...
  16. Then a fight to the death then!
  17. Onward, to victory!!! o/ CDT!!!
  18. Erik's decision is well-respected. I would have done the same under those circumstances. Sorry OoJ. You possibly lost your best member.
  19. Been too long.... Hey! Have a great Thanksgiving with your family! Now go and devour that succulent turkey!
  20. o/ OoJ Best of luck with the treaty guys!
  21. Erik, you suck. How dare you leave us to join this rubbish! (j/k, I love you Erik ) Good luck to the OoJ!
×
×
  • Create New...